Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2578646538> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2578646538 endingPage "609" @default.
- W2578646538 startingPage "569" @default.
- W2578646538 abstract "Caribbean Visions: Revolutionary Mysticism in “Theresa: A Haytien Tale” Mary Grace Albanese (bio) Haiti achieved independence on three different dates. According to a good part of the world and to subsequent official histories, this date was 1 January 1804. But the nascent republic’s former colonizers, still following the French Revolutionary calendar, would have situated their loss on the 10 Nivôse, year XII. The Haitian Declaration of Independence itself offers yet a third date: “ce 1er Janvier 1804, an 1er de l’indépendance.”1 Haiti’s foundational document established an alternative calendrical tradition that, although never systematized, would continue from the first Haitian Constitution (1805) to the writings of the 1843 revolutionaries, the empire of Faustin Soulouque, the US occupation, throughout the Duvalier regimes, and well into the present. Haitian institutions have long validated their authority using this temporal mode, one that marks, in Erin Zavitz’s words, “the beginning not just of a new year but a new era.”2 Yet such historiographical manipulations offer more than a means of auto-legitimation. The Haitian Revolutionary calendar establishes a logic by which the present is always subject to the tabula rasa of the past revolutionary moment; conversely, the so-called tabula rasa of revolution always [End Page 569] indexes historical process. This doubling movement upsets rectilinear trajectories while refusing to collapse past and present into perfect synchronicity. In this respect, the calendar’s temporal structure operates similarly, although not identically, to twentieth-century Caribbean theories of history, recalling Derek Walcott’s claim that the “sea is history,” Maryse Condé’s playfully wry palimpsests, and the heady narratives of the Haitian Spiralists.3 Much like these later timekeepers, revolutionary chronologies in early Haitian print culture demonstrate how the persistence of history confounds ostensibly simple trajectories of national time, establishing a temporal mode that simultaneously looks backwards and anticipates the future. This system of parallel dating not only inflects how we read foundational fictions, to use Doris Sommer’s memorable terminology, but also foregrounds the heterogeneous temporalities through which the events eventually known as the Haitian Revolution were historicized.4 In what follows, I analyze this historicization within “Theresa; a Haytien Tale” (1828), a fictionalization of the Haitian Revolution, now widely recognized as the first work of African American short fiction.5 I suggest that we read “Theresa” through a temporal emplotment that mirrors the revolutionary calendar: as a complex counterhistory in which Haitian emancipation runs alongside US national time. Written by an author known only by the signature “S” and printed in four installments in the New York-based, predominantly African American Freedom’s Journal, “Theresa” takes place at an unspecified point between 1802–3 during Napoleon’s failed reconquest of Saint Domingue. “S” recounts the trials of the free woman of color, Madame Paulina, and her daughters, Amanda and the eponymous Theresa. Through various actions, which include crossdressing, forging papers, eavesdropping, and experiencing several overwhelming spiritual experiences, the three women help achieve Haitian independence, [End Page 570] offering a feminine familial history within the framework of national historiography. Through its celebration of revolutionary female action, “Theresa” powerfully counterpoises the masculinist Toussaint-centric chronicles that dominated nineteenth-century print culture.6 It comes as no surprise, then, that critics have largely foregrounded the tale’s representations of female agency. Dickson Bruce has called this story the “first attempt by an African writer to create a black romantic heroine,” while Frances Smith Foster uses “Theresa” as evidence that the readers of Freedom’s Journal were accustomed to “‘black’ women as heroic protagonists.” More recently, Marlene Daut has not only highlighted the story’s modes of female resistance but has also argued compellingly for its female authorship.7 Yet equally interesting is how even the unorthodox “Theresa” embodies early African American cultural formations that envisioned Haiti as a possible space for the realization of Enlightenment promises of universal rights—promises on which African Americans’ own government had so appallingly failed them. Though traditional critical narratives have portrayed US black culture as reluctant to sympathize with Haiti, recent work by Robert S. Levine, Daut, Ada Ferrer, Elizabeth Maddock Dillon, Michael J. Drexler, and Sara Fanning has demonstrated how the nation provided an..." @default.
- W2578646538 created "2017-01-26" @default.
- W2578646538 creator A5068766793 @default.
- W2578646538 date "2016-01-01" @default.
- W2578646538 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2578646538 title "Caribbean Visions: Revolutionary Mysticism in “Theresa: A Haytien Tale”" @default.
- W2578646538 cites W130045708 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W1488876403 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W1489008194 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W1505003127 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W1551326987 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W1577788014 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W1606158013 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W1832859642 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W1953578172 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W1966583647 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W1968788462 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W1974079585 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W1976256684 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W1998584578 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2009385527 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2010604396 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2018132768 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2020783885 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2027942087 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2030535778 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2060005873 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2060696800 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2065325787 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2075686347 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2103110055 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2113097492 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2131653364 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2157434589 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2160363490 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2161646288 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2184145661 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2289487806 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2322559243 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2328574857 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2329542364 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2419074876 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2460485163 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2466616465 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2476620185 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2493796147 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2504871892 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2506799328 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2618139685 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2796047777 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2796408068 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2797142413 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2801922301 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2802099212 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2935842994 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2993531354 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W3134626674 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W3145420878 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W356958234 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W561889722 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W562705170 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W569983659 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W595150674 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W597105274 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W604661964 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W647222965 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W651486715 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W655078268 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W658482882 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2025995341 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2326273630 @default.
- W2578646538 cites W2346532261 @default.
- W2578646538 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/esq.2016.0023" @default.
- W2578646538 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2578646538 type Work @default.
- W2578646538 sameAs 2578646538 @default.
- W2578646538 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2578646538 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2578646538 hasAuthorship W2578646538A5068766793 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C133979268 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C169081014 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C195244886 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C2778495208 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C2778607876 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C29598333 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C35651441 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2578646538 hasConceptScore W2578646538C105795698 @default.