Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2579248110> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 items per page.
- W2579248110 endingPage "655" @default.
- W2579248110 startingPage "655" @default.
- W2579248110 abstract "I am writing in response to the recent article, “Is Cone Beam Computed Tomography Always Necessary for Dental Implant Placement?”, 1 Deeb G, Antonos L, Tack S, et al: Is cone beam computed tomography always necessary for dental implant placement? [published online ahead of print November 15, 2016]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.11.014. Google Scholar published in the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Is Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Always Necessary for Dental Implant Placement?Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryVol. 75Issue 2PreviewThe use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for evaluation of patients for dental implants has gained considerable popularity. This retrospective cohort study was designed to determine whether using a clinical examination and a panoramic radiograph (Panorex) for implant selection and determining the need for bone grafting would be comparable to using CBCT in routine implant cases. Full-Text PDF In ReplyJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryVol. 75Issue 4PreviewWe agree, as you note in your letter and as our study confirms, that cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is more accurate than panoramic radiography. However, does that mean that it should be used in all implant cases? As you indicate, and we emphasize in our article, there is the question of increased radiation exposure, lack of access, and cost. Therefore, we undertook our study to compare the treatment planning accuracy of the 2 methods. Our findings indicated that the use of a panoramic radiograph and a clinical examination are adequate for routine implant planning and that CBCT should be used for cases in which there is close proximity of vital structures, possible need for adjunctive bone grafting, or planned guided surgery. Full-Text PDF" @default.
- W2579248110 created "2017-01-26" @default.
- W2579248110 creator A5032133655 @default.
- W2579248110 date "2017-04-01" @default.
- W2579248110 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2579248110 title "Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Implant Dentistry: Back to the Future" @default.
- W2579248110 cites W2102366032 @default.
- W2579248110 cites W2168323456 @default.
- W2579248110 cites W2559294704 @default.
- W2579248110 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.12.028" @default.
- W2579248110 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28108371" @default.
- W2579248110 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2579248110 type Work @default.
- W2579248110 sameAs 2579248110 @default.
- W2579248110 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W2579248110 countsByYear W25792481102018 @default.
- W2579248110 countsByYear W25792481102020 @default.
- W2579248110 countsByYear W25792481102022 @default.
- W2579248110 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2579248110 hasAuthorship W2579248110A5032133655 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConcept C2778636310 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConcept C2779813781 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConcept C2780338112 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConceptScore W2579248110C126838900 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConceptScore W2579248110C141071460 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConceptScore W2579248110C199343813 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConceptScore W2579248110C201645570 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConceptScore W2579248110C2778636310 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConceptScore W2579248110C2779813781 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConceptScore W2579248110C2780338112 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConceptScore W2579248110C2781411149 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConceptScore W2579248110C29694066 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConceptScore W2579248110C36454342 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConceptScore W2579248110C509974204 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConceptScore W2579248110C544519230 @default.
- W2579248110 hasConceptScore W2579248110C71924100 @default.
- W2579248110 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2579248110 hasLocation W25792481101 @default.
- W2579248110 hasLocation W25792481102 @default.
- W2579248110 hasOpenAccess W2579248110 @default.
- W2579248110 hasPrimaryLocation W25792481101 @default.
- W2579248110 hasRelatedWork W1970783452 @default.
- W2579248110 hasRelatedWork W2047198120 @default.
- W2579248110 hasRelatedWork W2158400556 @default.
- W2579248110 hasRelatedWork W2327757939 @default.
- W2579248110 hasRelatedWork W2411773630 @default.
- W2579248110 hasRelatedWork W2418552927 @default.
- W2579248110 hasRelatedWork W2883107118 @default.
- W2579248110 hasRelatedWork W2990606343 @default.
- W2579248110 hasRelatedWork W3164600443 @default.
- W2579248110 hasRelatedWork W4307380094 @default.
- W2579248110 hasVolume "75" @default.
- W2579248110 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2579248110 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2579248110 magId "2579248110" @default.
- W2579248110 workType "article" @default.