Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2580779713> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 65 of
65
with 100 items per page.
- W2580779713 endingPage "178" @default.
- W2580779713 startingPage "159" @default.
- W2580779713 abstract "Abstract What should be meant by a scientific approach to policy and how it might help create a more appropriate way of reaching decisions? Many years in practical policy making show that it is part science and part art. Complex systems science, as a form of story telling, can create links between them. Three aspects of policy making are considered: (1) the nature of proof in science and decision making, and how introducing new science into decision making is an under appreciated problem; (2) optimisation and that, despite optimal solutions not existing, policy makers want a single solution with unintended consequences left for future generations of policy makers; and (3) ceteris paribus —other things being equal, and the problem of deciding which things can be left alone and over what time periods. In policy, proof is an argument required by investors, regulators, and other decision makers. Proof must satisfy the beliefs and traditions of the decision maker, even when the former contradict observation and the latter are flawed, e.g. ‘we have been doing it this way for thirty years so it must be right’. In policy, the belief in optimisation is particularly strong, within a tradition that focusses on parts and ignores wholes. Arguably, individuals do not always optimise and often make decisions by copying others, opening up new ways of nudging people towards compliance. Also firms may not optimise due to risk aversion, lack of information, or just focussing on survival. Even if optimisation were possible, a narrow view on what is being optimised can lead to missed opportunities, as in the case of the multiple returns of agglomeration. Also, although innovation is a pillar of economic policy, its necessary dynamics are incompatible with equilibrium theories. Equilibrium also suggests that ‘do nothing’ is a policy option for no change, rather than drifting into the unknown. However, ‘doing something’ has the additionality problem , namely showing the benefits over doing nothing or something else. All investment impacts are on the balance of probabilities. Risk free investment and risk free polices are not possible in a complex world. What matters is to have a strong story, backed up by strong evidence on the main elements of the story. Then take a bet." @default.
- W2580779713 created "2017-02-03" @default.
- W2580779713 creator A5028151581 @default.
- W2580779713 date "2017-01-01" @default.
- W2580779713 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2580779713 title "Complexity Science and the Art of Policy Making" @default.
- W2580779713 cites W4237655977 @default.
- W2580779713 cites W4312861501 @default.
- W2580779713 cites W576732303 @default.
- W2580779713 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42424-8_11" @default.
- W2580779713 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2580779713 type Work @default.
- W2580779713 sameAs 2580779713 @default.
- W2580779713 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W2580779713 countsByYear W25807797132017 @default.
- W2580779713 countsByYear W25807797132020 @default.
- W2580779713 countsByYear W25807797132023 @default.
- W2580779713 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
- W2580779713 hasAuthorship W2580779713A5028151581 @default.
- W2580779713 hasBestOaLocation W25807797131 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConcept C118084267 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConcept C138090074 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConcept C2776889888 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConcept C2779151265 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConcept C2780328347 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConceptScore W2580779713C118084267 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConceptScore W2580779713C138090074 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConceptScore W2580779713C162324750 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConceptScore W2580779713C175444787 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConceptScore W2580779713C17744445 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConceptScore W2580779713C185592680 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConceptScore W2580779713C190253527 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConceptScore W2580779713C199539241 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConceptScore W2580779713C2776889888 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConceptScore W2580779713C2779151265 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConceptScore W2580779713C2780328347 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConceptScore W2580779713C55493867 @default.
- W2580779713 hasConceptScore W2580779713C98184364 @default.
- W2580779713 hasLocation W25807797131 @default.
- W2580779713 hasOpenAccess W2580779713 @default.
- W2580779713 hasPrimaryLocation W25807797131 @default.
- W2580779713 hasRelatedWork W1849295735 @default.
- W2580779713 hasRelatedWork W1985706473 @default.
- W2580779713 hasRelatedWork W2017926210 @default.
- W2580779713 hasRelatedWork W2120513484 @default.
- W2580779713 hasRelatedWork W2528689777 @default.
- W2580779713 hasRelatedWork W2580779713 @default.
- W2580779713 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2580779713 hasRelatedWork W2990922203 @default.
- W2580779713 hasRelatedWork W3034099811 @default.
- W2580779713 hasRelatedWork W4381805704 @default.
- W2580779713 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2580779713 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2580779713 magId "2580779713" @default.
- W2580779713 workType "book-chapter" @default.