Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W258178051> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 75 of
75
with 100 items per page.
- W258178051 startingPage "195" @default.
- W258178051 abstract "For decades, legal scholars have struggled with the problem of pretextual searches and seizures. These are defined as police using their power to stop or search or arrest for one crime, usually a minor crime, as a means of triggering the ability to search, without probable cause, for evidence of other crimes. That is, police might stop a person in order to conduct a Terry frisk, or arrest a driver for speeding in order to conduct a search-incident-to-arrest or an inventory search. Police may conduct them hoping to “get lucky” and find evidence of criminality. In short, when used pretextually, protective searches amount to discretionary searches unsupported by probable cause – precisely the government oppression that the Fourth Amendment was framed to protect citizens against. The United States Supreme Court, however, has made pretextual searches permissible under the Fourth Amendment as a result of its unanimous decision in Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), which held that the subjective motivations of police are irrelevant as long as their conduct is objectively reasonable; therefore, reasonable suspicion of any crime will suffice to * Professor of Law, Florida Coastal School of Law. J.D., Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley. A.B., Dartmouth College. I thank Ron Angerer (FCSL Class of 2013) for his outstanding research assistance. I thank Martin Witt, FCSL Research Librarian, for helping me track down old articles. I thank M.G. Piety for reviewing the draft, and I thank the Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law editors for their excellent work. I thank Dean C. Peter Goplerud for the research grant that helped me finish this article. I thank Boston University School of Law, where much of the research for this article was done when I was a Visiting Associate Professor of Law there from 2008-10. 1 Foley: Contraband Immunity: Updating Amsterdam, LaFave, and White's Use Published by Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository, 2012" @default.
- W258178051 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W258178051 creator A5032596165 @default.
- W258178051 date "2012-01-01" @default.
- W258178051 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W258178051 title "Contraband Immunity: Updating Amsterdam, LaFave, and White's Use Exclusion Proposal to Limit Police Pretext" @default.
- W258178051 doi "https://doi.org/10.15779/z389w52" @default.
- W258178051 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
- W258178051 type Work @default.
- W258178051 sameAs 258178051 @default.
- W258178051 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W258178051 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W258178051 hasAuthorship W258178051A5032596165 @default.
- W258178051 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W258178051 hasConcept C140334061 @default.
- W258178051 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W258178051 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W258178051 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W258178051 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
- W258178051 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W258178051 hasConcept C2779298689 @default.
- W258178051 hasConcept C2779627259 @default.
- W258178051 hasConcept C2780262971 @default.
- W258178051 hasConcept C2781298881 @default.
- W258178051 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W258178051 hasConcept C61547137 @default.
- W258178051 hasConcept C69775031 @default.
- W258178051 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
- W258178051 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W258178051 hasConceptScore W258178051C138885662 @default.
- W258178051 hasConceptScore W258178051C140334061 @default.
- W258178051 hasConceptScore W258178051C144024400 @default.
- W258178051 hasConceptScore W258178051C17744445 @default.
- W258178051 hasConceptScore W258178051C199539241 @default.
- W258178051 hasConceptScore W258178051C2778137410 @default.
- W258178051 hasConceptScore W258178051C2778272461 @default.
- W258178051 hasConceptScore W258178051C2779298689 @default.
- W258178051 hasConceptScore W258178051C2779627259 @default.
- W258178051 hasConceptScore W258178051C2780262971 @default.
- W258178051 hasConceptScore W258178051C2781298881 @default.
- W258178051 hasConceptScore W258178051C41895202 @default.
- W258178051 hasConceptScore W258178051C61547137 @default.
- W258178051 hasConceptScore W258178051C69775031 @default.
- W258178051 hasConceptScore W258178051C73484699 @default.
- W258178051 hasConceptScore W258178051C94625758 @default.
- W258178051 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W258178051 hasLocation W2581780511 @default.
- W258178051 hasOpenAccess W258178051 @default.
- W258178051 hasPrimaryLocation W2581780511 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W1196505397 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W2141241002 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W2293958025 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W2299890472 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W2551007766 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W260157465 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W285062094 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W2933412771 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W2994034000 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W3121227429 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W3121477376 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W3121796970 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W3123315992 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W3124851850 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W3125095749 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W3125367846 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W3125517758 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W814207584 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W218589331 @default.
- W258178051 hasRelatedWork W2255665552 @default.
- W258178051 hasVolume "17" @default.
- W258178051 isParatext "false" @default.
- W258178051 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W258178051 magId "258178051" @default.
- W258178051 workType "article" @default.