FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2582123586> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2582123586 abstract "Academic performance is universally recognised as the most appropriate measure of learning (e.g., Bowman, 2010; Gonyea, 2005). However, a recent review by McGrath and colleagues (2015) highlighted that students’ academic excellence can better be defined as progress or distance travelled in their knowledge, skills and personal development. According to the self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985; Ryan & Deci, 2000) humans naturally strive for progress and therefore progress in studying is conceptually more accurate reppresentation of learning than achievement per se. While there are some studies in the US aiming to examine predictors of students’ learning gains (e.g., Beck & Blumer, 2012; Cahill et al., 2014), there is little research done on academic progress in Europe. The current study aims to examine whether approaches to studying that showed to correlate with academic achievements (e.g., Diseth, Pallesen, Brunborg, & Larsen, 2010; Rogaten, Moneta & Spada, 2013) can equally well predict learning progress, and whether any particular approach to studying facilitates better progress at different stages of a degree and at different baseline levels of academic performance.A sample of 504 undergraduate students from a London University took part in this research. Coursework grades from prior semester and end-of-semester were retrieved from the university database, and each student completed the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). Associations between approaches to studying and end-of-semester grades, and their interactions with degree level and prior semester grades, were tested using Model 3 of the PROCESS Macro (Hayes, n.d.). Models were estimated separately for deep, strategic and surface approaches to studying. The deep approach predicted academic progress of weaker students in the beginning of their degree and undermined academic progress towards the end of a degree. The strategic approach to studying predicted academic progress for academically strong students towards the end of their degree. Importantly, there was no association between surface approach to studying and coursework attainments. As such, results support the importance of adaptive approaches to studying for academic success. The findings from this study have important theoretical implications and practical applications. Firstly, developing students’ deep and strategic approaches to studying is more important for academic success than merely preventing the surface approach, but in doing so one needs to consider students’ ability and level of education they are currently at. Secondly, understanding the moderating effect of a degree level on the relationship between approaches to studying and learning gains will enable teachers to design curricula and educational environment that facilitates learning gains for students with different starting abilities." @default.
• W2582123586 created "2017-02-03" @default.
• W2582123586 creator A5012148461 @default.
• W2582123586 creator A5039812794 @default.
• W2582123586 date "2016-01-01" @default.
• W2582123586 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W2582123586 title "Academic excellence: the dynamic relationship between approaches to studying and learning gain." @default.
• W2582123586 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2582123586 type Work @default.
• W2582123586 sameAs 2582123586 @default.
• W2582123586 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2582123586 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2582123586 hasAuthorship W2582123586A5012148461 @default.
• W2582123586 hasAuthorship W2582123586A5039812794 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConcept C2777352838 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConcept C2778883038 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConcept C2781110425 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConcept C2781206393 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConcept C65414064 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConceptScore W2582123586C145420912 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConceptScore W2582123586C15744967 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConceptScore W2582123586C17744445 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConceptScore W2582123586C199539241 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConceptScore W2582123586C2777352838 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConceptScore W2582123586C2778883038 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConceptScore W2582123586C2781110425 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConceptScore W2582123586C2781206393 @default.
• W2582123586 hasConceptScore W2582123586C65414064 @default.
• W2582123586 hasLocation W25821235861 @default.
• W2582123586 hasOpenAccess W2582123586 @default.
• W2582123586 hasPrimaryLocation W25821235861 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W100609788 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W1918816297 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W1983318442 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W1984502681 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W1984789735 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W2095716700 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W2167604566 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W2566103733 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W2567262506 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W2579897666 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W2789616205 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W2791368354 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W2921790575 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W3004410847 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W3042096794 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W3177758599 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W33998888 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W562876136 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W81979261 @default.
• W2582123586 hasRelatedWork W2608035941 @default.
• W2582123586 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2582123586 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2582123586 magId "2582123586" @default.
• W2582123586 workType "article" @default.