FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2584144197> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2584144197 endingPage "134" @default.
• W2584144197 startingPage "116" @default.
• W2584144197 abstract "Purpose This paper aims to examine briefing practices and whether these are related to the quality of brief documents and client satisfaction in constructed health-care facilities in South Africa. The rational for the examination stems from the view held by scholars that the briefing process is critical to the success of projects, as well as client/user satisfaction in the constructed facility, and also because of undocumented reports of client/end-user dissatisfaction in constructed health-care facilities in South Africa. Design/methodology/approach The research process consisted of a literature review to identify existing briefing framework and practices in use applicable to facilities. This was supported by an exploratory case study of a recently completed public hospital in East London, South Africa. Data collection for the study was undertaken by means of conducting semi-structured interviews with two groups consisting of client representatives and the technical design team on the project. Findings The research established that in the context of this case study, inadequate client consultation took place, not all design consultants were adequately involved in the development of the project brief, limited use was made of a specific briefing framework in developing the project brief and that despite these shortcomings in the briefing process followed, a comprehensive good quality briefing document was produced and the client was satisfied with the health-care facility constructed. Research limitations/implications The results of this study are generalizable with health-care facilities only. As such, research inferences and projections can only be made within this set and may not necessarily be applicable to the wider construction sector or to all projects within this sector. Practical implications The implications of this research are applicable to constructed health-care facilities. Practical inferences include the need to acknowledge that there is a need for a briefing framework, which should outline the involvement of all design consultants and client representatives when developing the project briefs for health-care facilities. The briefing framework is proposed for use in addressing the shortcomings in the briefing processes and practices and will also help the client in the choice of a brief process and practice which will comprehensively capture their requirements, give clear directives/information to the design consultants and will result in higher levels of end-user/patient satisfaction in the constructed health-care facility. Social implications Clients and allied professionals in charge of health-care facilities’ construction are encouraged to consider the implementation of a standard framework for use in the briefing process. This reflection should encourage engagement through formative legislative provision and transparent awareness campaigns. Originality/value This work is original insofar, as it directly addresses the alignment of briefing practices to quality of brief documents and client satisfaction in constructed health-care facilities within the context of the South African construction industry. However, similar exercises have been undertaken on briefing practices in the wider construction sector." @default.
• W2584144197 created "2017-02-10" @default.
• W2584144197 creator A5013072152 @default.
• W2584144197 creator A5067494478 @default.
• W2584144197 date "2017-02-07" @default.
• W2584144197 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2584144197 title "Briefing practice and client satisfaction" @default.
• W2584144197 cites W1985535243 @default.
• W2584144197 cites W1991571800 @default.
• W2584144197 cites W2006389585 @default.
• W2584144197 cites W2028046474 @default.
• W2584144197 cites W2028052514 @default.
• W2584144197 cites W2034566166 @default.
• W2584144197 cites W2060334064 @default.
• W2584144197 cites W2080416239 @default.
• W2584144197 cites W2088496476 @default.
• W2584144197 cites W2145552488 @default.
• W2584144197 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/f-07-2015-0047" @default.
• W2584144197 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2584144197 type Work @default.
• W2584144197 sameAs 2584144197 @default.
• W2584144197 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2584144197 countsByYear W25841441972020 @default.
• W2584144197 countsByYear W25841441972021 @default.
• W2584144197 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2584144197 hasAuthorship W2584144197A5013072152 @default.
• W2584144197 hasAuthorship W2584144197A5067494478 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C85973986 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C111472728 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C111919701 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C127413603 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C138885662 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C144024400 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C159110408 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C160735492 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C166957645 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C17744445 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C19165224 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C199539241 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C205649164 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C2779343474 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C2779530757 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C41008148 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C71924100 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C85973986 @default.
• W2584144197 hasConceptScore W2584144197C98045186 @default.
• W2584144197 hasIssue "1/2" @default.
• W2584144197 hasLocation W25841441971 @default.
• W2584144197 hasOpenAccess W2584144197 @default.
• W2584144197 hasPrimaryLocation W25841441971 @default.
• W2584144197 hasRelatedWork W1488983252 @default.
• W2584144197 hasRelatedWork W2003018272 @default.
• W2584144197 hasRelatedWork W2352015183 @default.
• W2584144197 hasRelatedWork W2404257900 @default.
• W2584144197 hasRelatedWork W2424075050 @default.
• W2584144197 hasRelatedWork W2442696241 @default.
• W2584144197 hasRelatedWork W2470286635 @default.
• W2584144197 hasRelatedWork W2474739842 @default.
• W2584144197 hasRelatedWork W4320719229 @default.
• W2584144197 hasRelatedWork W4377247992 @default.
• W2584144197 hasVolume "35" @default.
• W2584144197 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2584144197 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2584144197 magId "2584144197" @default.
• W2584144197 workType "article" @default.