FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2586413140> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2586413140 startingPage "72" @default.
• W2586413140 abstract "INTRODUCTION The subject of investigation is the philosophy in situation of homogenization of the conditions of its existence. One can formulate the question differently: is the modern philosophy totally inherently bourgeois or there is the opportunity to go beyond the uniqueness of its social, ideological and methodological constructions. We proceed from the fact that the existence of philosophy meant the fundamental dialogueness that was expressed in different variants: materialism / idealism, the secular / religious, the rationalist / irrationalist, etc. This dialogueness can be represented as expression of the principle of falsification in philosophy, which is evidence of its deep theoretical nature if not its being scientific. From our point of view, only when preserving the polyphonic context of philosophizing and its results, one can talk about philosophy in its current state. METHODS The initial methodology is the methodology of Marx, that is, the dialectical materialist interpretation of the principle of historicism. DISCUSSION We will refer to bourgeois as the specific orientation of theoretical thinking which has developed in Europe since the 17th century. We will start with the Marxist thesis: who possesses the means of the material production, possesses the means of the mental production. So, in total domination of the bourgeois relations all spiritual (already--theoretical) products, including philosophy, by definition, will bear the imprint of bourgeoisness. But what should influence the philosophy it not to become bourgeois totally, but go beyond the concrete world vision and appropinquate to the universality, not only pretend to it? Can philosophy today recognize unfinished process of anthropo-socio-culture-genesis and, therefore, admit the possibility of the outsidedness point in relation to the existing social circumstances, that is, can it be nonbourgeois? Otherwise, we can really suggest the of philosophy in logic, which Fukuyama suggests the end of history in. And finally, is there possibility for philosophy in its original split to act as methodology of social cognition? These issues are the consequence of the recognition of total point of view, which we conventionally call the adoption of the bourgeois principles and standards of thinking. The definition of philosophy as private discourse claiming the status of universality, which is so popular in the postmodern discourse, is tacit acceptance of that there is certain common line that does not imply different optics of appreciation of the world. It is obvious that this issue cannot be resolved from any anthropological position, because we are not faced with the non-historical man in general, who is no less abstraction than a person, an individual or a representative of class. A concrete socio-historical personage acts in the society. Man in general is fiction. It is impossible to find him in the logic of elementarization. Then the possibility of philosophy's going into horizon of universality is connected not with the ability to accept the standpoint of man in general, but with the ability to see the difference of single and unique in the genetic antinomy. But as soon as the theory (including the philosophical one) begins to see itself as unique and universal, or as soon as we appeal, on the contrary, to infinity of distinction, we find the risk of death of the philosophy, which will be shown in its embourgeoisement in particular historical event. Philosophy has always developed in polemical and dialogic situation. At the turn of XVIII-XIX centuries, it resulted in the polarization of positions between materialism and idealism. When this dichotomy soon displayed its ultimate, another dichotomy became necessary: for example, national - transnational, although philosophy runs away from this national specificity and clings to the transnational nature of the scientific (philosophical) thinking. …" @default.
• W2586413140 created "2017-02-17" @default.
• W2586413140 creator A5000214179 @default.
• W2586413140 creator A5000525697 @default.
• W2586413140 date "2016-01-01" @default.
• W2586413140 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2586413140 title "Reflection on the Phenomenon of Contemporary Philosophy as the Methodological Base of Social Sciences" @default.
• W2586413140 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2586413140 type Work @default.
• W2586413140 sameAs 2586413140 @default.
• W2586413140 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2586413140 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2586413140 hasAuthorship W2586413140A5000214179 @default.
• W2586413140 hasAuthorship W2586413140A5000525697 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C130064352 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C13184196 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C133437341 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C144218379 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C184386139 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C198777802 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C2776399210 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C36629368 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C535567245 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C111472728 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C130064352 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C13184196 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C133437341 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C138885662 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C144024400 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C144218379 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C158071213 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C17744445 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C184386139 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C198777802 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C199539241 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C2776399210 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C36289849 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C36629368 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C535567245 @default.
• W2586413140 hasConceptScore W2586413140C94625758 @default.
• W2586413140 hasLocation W25864131401 @default.
• W2586413140 hasOpenAccess W2586413140 @default.
• W2586413140 hasPrimaryLocation W25864131401 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W109032381 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W120462506 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W1503413394 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W1508416212 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W158678021 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W1892059247 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W1965417805 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W1976815908 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W2024445388 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W2058955965 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W2090060176 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W2094034737 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W2476411831 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W2476829683 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W2480454681 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W2497770485 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W2498666589 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W3107140135 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W348559901 @default.
• W2586413140 hasRelatedWork W5244717 @default.
• W2586413140 hasVolume "20" @default.
• W2586413140 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2586413140 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2586413140 magId "2586413140" @default.
• W2586413140 workType "article" @default.