FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2586607695> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2586607695 abstract "Abstract In the wake of the August 2012 fire at the Chevron refinery in Richmond, California, the United States (US) Chemical Safety Board proposed the safety case regulatory approach as an alternative to the current approach used in the US today. The current regulations known as the Process Safety Management (PSM) regulations were promulgated in 1992. This followed several highly publicized catastrophic incidents (e.g., Phillips 66 Pasadena, Texas polyethylene plant explosion, 1989; Piper Alpha, North Sea, 1988 and Bhopal, India, 1984). The US approach to regulation is best described as a combination of prescriptive and performance-based regulations that address safety considerations in design and operations. A safety case approach, as used in the United Kingdom (UK), Australia and Norway, requires a detailed analysis of hazards and steps taken to address those hazards, and thus minimize or mitigate the risk. Both the safety case and PSM processes address many of the same aspects such as management of change, identification of hazards and assessment of risks, but the process and format for documentation and regulatory review differs. The question then arises as to the effectiveness of these two regulatory regimes in preventing process safety related incidents. Many reputable organizations and research groups have taken positions regarding whether the US should abandon the existing system of safety regulations. Review of several global incidents has shown that while appropriate hazards and risks were identified, operational shortcomings led to incidents. Uniform and consistent process safety data are in the early stages of being collected and published by such organizations as the American Petroleum Institute (API) and The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (OGP), using API RP 754 defined metrics. For this paper, data have been collected on oil and gas operations in the US, UK, Norway and Australia to compare the performance of the differing regulatory regimes. While the data are not comprehensive, from existing data on major incidents, spills and fatalities, one cannot conclude that one regulatory regime is superior to the other. Consistent reporting of incidents in a database with appropriate metrics is sorely needed. Furthermore, the authors express the need to move beyond regulatory compliance and suggest research on application of a systems approach to process safety by developing a process resilience analysis framework for process design and operations." @default.
• W2586607695 created "2017-02-17" @default.
• W2586607695 creator A5006947319 @default.
• W2586607695 creator A5012962458 @default.
• W2586607695 creator A5021379147 @default.
• W2586607695 creator A5045904196 @default.
• W2586607695 creator A5088343139 @default.
• W2586607695 date "2017-03-01" @default.
• W2586607695 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2586607695 title "Regulatory approaches - Safety case vs US approach: Is there a best solution today?" @default.
• W2586607695 cites W2529629364 @default.
• W2586607695 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.02.001" @default.
• W2586607695 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2586607695 type Work @default.
• W2586607695 sameAs 2586607695 @default.
• W2586607695 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2586607695 countsByYear W25866076952017 @default.
• W2586607695 countsByYear W25866076952018 @default.
• W2586607695 countsByYear W25866076952019 @default.
• W2586607695 countsByYear W25866076952020 @default.
• W2586607695 countsByYear W25866076952021 @default.
• W2586607695 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2586607695 hasAuthorship W2586607695A5006947319 @default.
• W2586607695 hasAuthorship W2586607695A5012962458 @default.
• W2586607695 hasAuthorship W2586607695A5021379147 @default.
• W2586607695 hasAuthorship W2586607695A5045904196 @default.
• W2586607695 hasAuthorship W2586607695A5088343139 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C145798840 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C174998907 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C184356942 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C22507642 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C2780234205 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C32896092 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C548081761 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C56666940 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C77595967 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C80038721 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C91375879 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C10138342 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C111919701 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C112930515 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C127413603 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C144133560 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C145798840 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C174998907 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C17744445 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C184356942 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C199360897 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C199539241 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C205649164 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C21547014 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C22507642 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C2780234205 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C32896092 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C41008148 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C548081761 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C56666940 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C77595967 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C80038721 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C91375879 @default.
• W2586607695 hasConceptScore W2586607695C98045186 @default.
• W2586607695 hasLocation W25866076951 @default.
• W2586607695 hasOpenAccess W2586607695 @default.
• W2586607695 hasPrimaryLocation W25866076951 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W1542698973 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W1750260379 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W1876146447 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W1969951170 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W2017175000 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W2041531689 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W2163378356 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W2258857366 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W2500756644 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W2544084295 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W2751163788 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W2775666523 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W2949084210 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W2970275983 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W2993524876 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W3094178200 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W3110818316 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W3126307042 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W338560166 @default.
• W2586607695 hasRelatedWork W93297608 @default.
• W2586607695 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2586607695 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2586607695 magId "2586607695" @default.
• W2586607695 workType "article" @default.