FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2587402668> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2587402668 startingPage "615" @default.
• W2587402668 abstract "Context: Credit Transfer (CT), Advanced Standing (AS), Credit for Prior Learning (CPL), Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL), Prior Learning Assessment and Recognition (PLAR), Accreditation of Prior Experiential Learning (APEL), Validation of Prior Learning (VPL), Prior Learning Assessment (PLA), Credit Transfer and Recognition (CTR), Recognition of Current Competency (RCC) and Credit for Concurrent Formal Learning (CCFL) are the terms used by academic institutions and engineering schools to describe several types of credit arrangements depending upon a student's current state of qualification, experience, skills and knowledge towards the requirement of his/her formal professional engineering qualification. The objectives of such credit arrangements are to make sure that the learning is not duplicated, to reduce the duration and cost of the engineering studies, to encourage working engineering associates and technologists return to engineering schools for professional engineering qualification and to help upgrade the skills and knowledge of the junior engineering practitioners, to name a few. Formal, informal, non-formal or a combination of prior learning are used for such credit arrangements. Engineering schools offer block credit, specified credit, unspecified credit and a combination of these forms of credits when recognising prior learning of any form. However, anecdotal and literature evidence suggests that the assessment of credit arrangements lacks established universal framework for assessment, lacks harmonisation, compatibility, transparency and comparability and is complex and inconsistent resulting a significant variations in the assessment for recognising prior learning across engineering schools in spite of being based on similar fundamental principles. There is a clear need of a consolidated framework in order to assess credit arrangements systematically and consistently. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop a consolidated framework for assessing credit arrangements towards a partial requirements of a professional engineering course, program, degree or qualification. The developed framework is expected to help manage the assessment of credit arrangement process. Approach: This study first critically reviews existing frameworks and literature evidences regarding the principles of credit arrangements towards a partial requirements of a professional engineering course, program, degree or qualification. This study then uses evidence-based literature knowledge (principles, processes and practices) to devise a consolidated framework for assessing credit arrangements. The framework is then expanded in order to elaborate its several components. Results: The existing frameworks and literature review suggest that for better assessment of credit arrangements, attentions are to be given on the forms of prior learning, types of credit arrangements, forms of credit recognition, required documents, characteristics of the prior learning, alignment of prior learning with professional engineering qualification and additional aspects. Conclusions: As the assessment of credit arrangements has been a major challenge for engineering schools, the framework developed in this study is expected to help engineering schools to manage the assessment process systematically and consistently. For further study, the framework needs to be continuously implemented, monitored and evaluated." @default.
• W2587402668 created "2017-02-17" @default.
• W2587402668 creator A5081217846 @default.
• W2587402668 date "2016-01-01" @default.
• W2587402668 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2587402668 title "Assessment of credit arrangements towards engineering programs/courses" @default.
• W2587402668 cites W1569877933 @default.
• W2587402668 cites W2014366921 @default.
• W2587402668 cites W2082317531 @default.
• W2587402668 cites W2121757671 @default.
• W2587402668 cites W2899636699 @default.
• W2587402668 cites W400134 @default.
• W2587402668 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2587402668 type Work @default.
• W2587402668 sameAs 2587402668 @default.
• W2587402668 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2587402668 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2587402668 hasAuthorship W2587402668A5081217846 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConcept C108583219 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConcept C2778827112 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConcept C37228920 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConcept C77967617 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConceptScore W2587402668C108583219 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConceptScore W2587402668C119857082 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConceptScore W2587402668C145420912 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConceptScore W2587402668C154945302 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConceptScore W2587402668C15744967 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConceptScore W2587402668C2778827112 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConceptScore W2587402668C37228920 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConceptScore W2587402668C41008148 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConceptScore W2587402668C509550671 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConceptScore W2587402668C56739046 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConceptScore W2587402668C61521584 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConceptScore W2587402668C71924100 @default.
• W2587402668 hasConceptScore W2587402668C77967617 @default.
• W2587402668 hasLocation W25874026681 @default.
• W2587402668 hasOpenAccess W2587402668 @default.
• W2587402668 hasPrimaryLocation W25874026681 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W1577814807 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W1579500606 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W1872924397 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W2104094246 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W2247052387 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W2550361794 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W2593271383 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W2624594483 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W2754927663 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W2789317365 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W3015300715 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W3111183803 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W3111410242 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W3121610488 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W3122767272 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W3142378620 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W563209088 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W2120643891 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W2177682688 @default.
• W2587402668 hasRelatedWork W3157009929 @default.
• W2587402668 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2587402668 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2587402668 magId "2587402668" @default.
• W2587402668 workType "article" @default.