FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2587743470> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2587743470 abstract "Enhancing Simulation-Based Learning through Active External Integration of Representations Daniel Bodemer (d.bodemer@iwm-kmrc.de) Knowledge Media Research Center, Konrad-Adenauer-Str. 40 72072 Tuebingen, Germany oriented way and therefore interact with the simulations rather randomly (e.g., de Jong & van Joolingen, 1998; Schauble, Glaser, Raghavan, & Reiner, 1991). Additional problems may be caused by the dynamic visualization of the simulated concepts. On the one hand the externalization of dynamic processes may prevent learners from performing cognitive processes relevant to learning on their own (e.g., Schnotz et al., 1999). On the other hand dynamic visualizations may overburden the learners’ cognitive capabilities due to large amounts of continuously changing information, particularly if the output variables are represented as non-interactive animations that do not provide learners with the possibility to adjust the playback speed or to watch single frames (e.g., Lowe, 1999). In order to cope with these requirements, learners frequently make use of a strategy that limits their processing to selected aspects of a dynamic visualization, which are often not the most relevant aspects of the visualization, but rather those that are most perceptually compelling (cf. Lowe, 2003). In order to support simulation-based discovery learning it has been suggested to structure the learners’ interactions with the learning environment (e.g., van Joolingen & de Jong, 1991). Typically, these support methods guide learners to focus on specific variables of the underlying model, to generate hypotheses about relationships between these variables, to conduct experiments in order to test the hypotheses, and to evaluate the hypotheses in light of the observed results. Furthermore, various instructional support methods have been developed to facilitate specific processes of discovery learning, such as offering predefined hypothe- ses or providing experimentation hints (e.g., Leutner, 1993; Njoo & de Jong, 1993; Swaak, van Joolingen & de Jong, 1998). However, empirical results regarding these methods of instructional guidance are ambiguous (cf. de Jong & van Joolingen, 1998). Learners frequently did not make sufficient use of the instructional support to increase their learning outcomes. One way to explain these findings is that learners lack prior knowledge necessary to benefit from complex visuali- zations. Learners who do not know enough about the domain of the visualized and simulated concept have problems processing complex dynamic visualizations and to interact with them in a goal-oriented way, even if they have enough information about useful learning behavior (cf. Leutner, 1993; Lowe, 1999; Schauble et al., 1991). Another reason – which is not independent from prior knowledge – is the difficulty of interconnecting multiple representations. Usually, simulations are embedded in multimedia learning Abstract Discovery learning with computer simulations is a demanding task for many learners. Frequently, even fostering systematic and goal-oriented learning behavior does not lead to better learning outcomes. This can be due to missing prerequisites such as the coherent mental integration of different types of representations comprised in the simulations and in the surrounding learning environment. Prior studies indicated that learning performances can be enhanced by encouraging learners to interactively and externally relate different static sources of information to each other before exploring dynamic and interactive visualizations. In an experimental study addressing the domain of mechanics it was largely confirmed that the active external integration of representa- tions can improve simulation-based learning outcomes. Introduction Computer-based learning environments increasingly comprise simulations in terms of dynamic and interactive visualizations to illustrate complex processes and abstract concepts. These simulations may be highly interactive in that they allow learners to change input variables by entering data or by manipulating visual objects and to observe the consequences of these changes in the dynamic visualizations as well as in additional representations such as numeric displays, formulas or text labels. The conceptual model underlying the simulations has frequently to be inferred by the learners in processes of discovery learning, which correspond to the steps of scien- tific reasoning: defining a problem, stating a hypothesis about the problem, designing an experiment to test the hypothesis, carrying out the experiment and collecting data, evaluating the data, and (re-)formulate a hypothesis. The use of simulations frequently aims at inducing active learner behavior and constructive learning processes (e.g., de Jong & van Joolingen, 1998; Rieber, Tzeng & Tribble, in press). Learners have to self-regulate their learning behavior in order to discover the underlying conceptual model, which is assumed to lead to the acquisition of deeper domain knowledge (e.g., Schnotz, Boeckheler, & Grzondziel, 1999). However, it has shown that learners encounter difficulties in all phases of the discovery learning process. For example, learners have problems formulating useful hypotheses, designing appropriate experiments, and evaluating the output variables adequately (e.g., de Jong & van Joolingen, 1998; Njoo & de Jong, 1993; Reigeluth & Schwartz, 1989; Reimann, 1991). Moreover, many learners have difficulties in planning their experiments in a systematic and goal-" @default.
• W2587743470 created "2017-02-17" @default.
• W2587743470 creator A5034681195 @default.
• W2587743470 date "2004-01-01" @default.
• W2587743470 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2587743470 title "Enhancing Simulation-Based Learning through Active External Integration of Representations" @default.
• W2587743470 cites W1567485225 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W1937377228 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W1982613500 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W1994102502 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2004599511 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2026161499 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2030860448 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2038403654 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2039336675 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2040297880 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2053828377 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2064859510 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2068579117 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2080211134 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2087622072 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2088730954 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2090334926 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2096036274 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2100758259 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2102052974 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2103857331 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2108906160 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2130736456 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2132426951 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2137814430 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2141019025 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2151715145 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2160383988 @default.
• W2587743470 cites W2337068785 @default.
• W2587743470 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2587743470 type Work @default.
• W2587743470 sameAs 2587743470 @default.
• W2587743470 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2587743470 countsByYear W25877434702012 @default.
• W2587743470 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2587743470 hasAuthorship W2587743470A5034681195 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConcept C36464697 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConcept C77967617 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConceptScore W2587743470C107457646 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConceptScore W2587743470C151730666 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConceptScore W2587743470C154945302 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConceptScore W2587743470C15744967 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConceptScore W2587743470C169760540 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConceptScore W2587743470C169900460 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConceptScore W2587743470C2777267654 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConceptScore W2587743470C36464697 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConceptScore W2587743470C41008148 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConceptScore W2587743470C77967617 @default.
• W2587743470 hasConceptScore W2587743470C86803240 @default.
• W2587743470 hasIssue "26" @default.
• W2587743470 hasLocation W25877434701 @default.
• W2587743470 hasOpenAccess W2587743470 @default.
• W2587743470 hasPrimaryLocation W25877434701 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W1123419 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W1540054624 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W1977666848 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W1984450253 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W198524325 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W2048430717 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W2068982642 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W2106870251 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W2115705843 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W2129168188 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W2138064441 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W2235347769 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W2284297812 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W2295513070 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W2325858707 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W2587078441 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W2622005879 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W2892194436 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W2950658018 @default.
• W2587743470 hasRelatedWork W86067968 @default.
• W2587743470 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W2587743470 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2587743470 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2587743470 magId "2587743470" @default.
• W2587743470 workType "article" @default.