FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2588348743> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2588348743 abstract "Two goals of summative assessment in health profession education programs are to ensure the robustness of high stakes decisions such as progression and licensing, and predict future performance. This systematic and critical review aims to investigate the ability of specific modes of summative assessment to predict the clinical performance of health profession education students.PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, ERIC and EMBASE databases were searched using key terms with articles collected subjected to dedicated inclusion criteria. Rigorous exclusion criteria were applied to ensure a consistent interpretation of 'summative assessment' and 'clinical performance'. Data were extracted using a pre-determined format and papers were critically appraised by two independent reviewers using a modified Downs and Black checklist with level of agreement between reviewers determined through a Kappa analysis.Of the 4783 studies retrieved from the search strategy, 18 studies were included in the final review. Twelve were from the medical profession and there was one from each of physiotherapy, pharmacy, dietetics, speech pathology, dentistry and dental hygiene. Objective Structured Clinical Examinations featured in 15 papers, written assessments in four and problem based learning evaluations, case based learning evaluations and student portfolios each featured in one paper. Sixteen different measures of clinical performance were used. Two papers were identified as 'poor' quality and the remainder categorised as 'fair' with an almost perfect (k = 0.852) level of agreement between raters. Objective Structured Clinical Examination scores accounted for 1.4-39.7% of the variance in student performance; multiple choice/extended matching questions and short answer written examinations accounted for 3.2-29.2%; problem based or case based learning evaluations accounted for 4.4-16.6%; and student portfolios accounted for 12.1%.Objective structured clinical examinations and written examinations consisting of multiple choice/extended matching questions and short answer questions do have significant relationships with the clinical performance of health professional students. However, caution should be applied if using these assessments as predictive measures for clinical performance due to a small body of evidence and large variations in the predictive strength of the relationships identified. Based on the current evidence, the Objective Structured Clinical Examination may be the most appropriate summative assessment for educators to use to identify students that may be at risk of poor performance in a clinical workplace environment. Further research on this topic is needed to improve the strength of the predictive relationship." @default.
• W2588348743 created "2017-02-24" @default.
• W2588348743 creator A5017012077 @default.
• W2588348743 creator A5020141348 @default.
• W2588348743 creator A5024831540 @default.
• W2588348743 creator A5070003113 @default.
• W2588348743 date "2017-02-16" @default.
• W2588348743 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2588348743 title "Do coursework summative assessments predict clinical performance? A systematic review" @default.
• W2588348743 cites W114205811 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W14388280 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W1444168786 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W1503523099 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W1555335348 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W1608620541 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W1644161572 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W1649332062 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W1947139409 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W1965252065 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W1972815748 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W1981939395 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W1983289637 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W1985089145 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W1991635648 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W1997133613 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2003096495 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2011740015 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2033959148 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2039079727 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2049774512 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2057006818 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2060713213 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2063227175 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2064399130 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2067067618 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2076132913 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2083564132 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2090242634 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2114488753 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2119923329 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2126524074 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2131972456 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2139001711 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2148456786 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2151694392 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2163467994 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2164973508 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2181326915 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2338529651 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2414928527 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W2589269133 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W341627053 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W4245056611 @default.
• W2588348743 cites W4299640698 @default.
• W2588348743 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0878-3" @default.
• W2588348743 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5314623" @default.
• W2588348743 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28209159" @default.
• W2588348743 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2588348743 type Work @default.
• W2588348743 sameAs 2588348743 @default.
• W2588348743 citedByCount "42" @default.
• W2588348743 countsByYear W25883487432017 @default.
• W2588348743 countsByYear W25883487432018 @default.
• W2588348743 countsByYear W25883487432019 @default.
• W2588348743 countsByYear W25883487432020 @default.
• W2588348743 countsByYear W25883487432021 @default.
• W2588348743 countsByYear W25883487432022 @default.
• W2588348743 countsByYear W25883487432023 @default.
• W2588348743 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2588348743 hasAuthorship W2588348743A5017012077 @default.
• W2588348743 hasAuthorship W2588348743A5020141348 @default.
• W2588348743 hasAuthorship W2588348743A5024831540 @default.
• W2588348743 hasAuthorship W2588348743A5070003113 @default.
• W2588348743 hasBestOaLocation W25883487431 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C109359841 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C111640148 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C152747807 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C22156102 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C2777286243 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C2781110425 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C42525527 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConceptScore W2588348743C109359841 @default.
• W2588348743 hasConceptScore W2588348743C111640148 @default.

• next