FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2589751619> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2589751619 endingPage "44" @default.
• W2589751619 startingPage "44" @default.
• W2589751619 abstract "44 Background: Conversations about wishes around the end-of-life(EOL) are challenging for clinicians. There is limited literature about the type and stability of patient’s reported EOL planning priorities. We compared a set of 36 cards (“Go-wish-Game”: GWG) v. a paper list of statements (LOS) to assist patients in establishing priorities. Methods: Randomized controlled study. Pts. were randomized to the GWG or to 36 LOS and were asked to categorize them as very, somewhat, or not important; Group A received LOS followed by LOS 4-24 hours later; group B: GWG-GWG; group C: GWG-LOS, and group D: LOS-GWG. The State-Trait Anxiety inventory for Adults(STAI) was done after the first set of questionnaires. Results: 100 pts. Median age (IQR): 56 (27-83) years. 60% female. 68% White, 17% Hispanic, and 9% African-American. 62% married. Age, marital status, religion, education and cancer diagnosis were not significant different among groups. All pts. were able to complete the GWG. 43/50 (88%) agreed that instructions of GWG were clear. 45/50 (92%) agreed that GWG was easy to understand. 31/50 (64%) patients exposed to both tools, preferred GWG. 39/50 (79%) expressed that GWG did not increased their anxiety. 31/50 (63%) expressed that having conversations about priorities near EOL is beneficial to them (p=NS). STAI median (IQR) score after GWG was 48 (39-59) v. 47 (27-63) for LOS, p=0.2952. The 10 most common “Very important” wishes expressed by pts. the first and second time they received the test (%; Spearman, p-value) were: to be at peace with God(74% v. 71%; r=0.73, p<0.0001), to pray(62% v. 61%, r=0.53, p<0.0001), to have my family with me(57% v. 61%; r=0.23, p=0.02), to be free from pain(54% v. 60%, r=0.31, p=0.001), not being a burden to my family(48% v. 49%, r=0.23, p=0.02), to trust my doctor(44% v. 45%; r=0.49, p<0.0001), to keep my sense of humor(41% v. 45%; r=0.53, p<0.0001), to say goodbye to important people in my life(41% v. 37%; r=0.46, p<0.0001); to have my family prepared for my death(40% v. 49%; r=0.48, p<0.0001). Conclusions: EOL wishes were similar and persistent using both GWG and LOS. Completing both GWG and LOS did not increase anxiety. All patients were able to complete and most preferred GWG." @default.
• W2589751619 created "2017-03-03" @default.
• W2589751619 creator A5026152840 @default.
• W2589751619 creator A5031637028 @default.
• W2589751619 creator A5041306543 @default.
• W2589751619 creator A5043871889 @default.
• W2589751619 creator A5058392144 @default.
• W2589751619 creator A5066722826 @default.
• W2589751619 creator A5079828009 @default.
• W2589751619 creator A5080439835 @default.
• W2589751619 creator A5090643981 @default.
• W2589751619 date "2015-10-10" @default.
• W2589751619 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2589751619 title "Advanced cancer patients' priorities regarding wishes at the end of life: A randomized controlled study." @default.
• W2589751619 doi "https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.33.29_suppl.44" @default.
• W2589751619 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2589751619 type Work @default.
• W2589751619 sameAs 2589751619 @default.
• W2589751619 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2589751619 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2589751619 hasAuthorship W2589751619A5026152840 @default.
• W2589751619 hasAuthorship W2589751619A5031637028 @default.
• W2589751619 hasAuthorship W2589751619A5041306543 @default.
• W2589751619 hasAuthorship W2589751619A5043871889 @default.
• W2589751619 hasAuthorship W2589751619A5058392144 @default.
• W2589751619 hasAuthorship W2589751619A5066722826 @default.
• W2589751619 hasAuthorship W2589751619A5079828009 @default.
• W2589751619 hasAuthorship W2589751619A5080439835 @default.
• W2589751619 hasAuthorship W2589751619A5090643981 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConcept C2781354955 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConcept C558461103 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConceptScore W2589751619C118552586 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConceptScore W2589751619C121608353 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConceptScore W2589751619C126322002 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConceptScore W2589751619C168563851 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConceptScore W2589751619C2781354955 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConceptScore W2589751619C2908647359 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConceptScore W2589751619C512399662 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConceptScore W2589751619C558461103 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConceptScore W2589751619C71924100 @default.
• W2589751619 hasConceptScore W2589751619C99454951 @default.
• W2589751619 hasIssue "29_suppl" @default.
• W2589751619 hasLocation W25897516191 @default.
• W2589751619 hasOpenAccess W2589751619 @default.
• W2589751619 hasPrimaryLocation W25897516191 @default.
• W2589751619 hasRelatedWork W2214986934 @default.
• W2589751619 hasRelatedWork W2356481678 @default.
• W2589751619 hasRelatedWork W2609940642 @default.
• W2589751619 hasRelatedWork W3159250744 @default.
• W2589751619 hasRelatedWork W4225313197 @default.
• W2589751619 hasRelatedWork W4256514411 @default.
• W2589751619 hasRelatedWork W4292236216 @default.
• W2589751619 hasRelatedWork W4321996925 @default.
• W2589751619 hasRelatedWork W4376872105 @default.
• W2589751619 hasRelatedWork W2083697902 @default.
• W2589751619 hasVolume "33" @default.
• W2589751619 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2589751619 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2589751619 magId "2589751619" @default.
• W2589751619 workType "article" @default.