FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2589894937> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2589894937 endingPage "149" @default.
• W2589894937 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2589894937 abstract "Background:This review is one in a series of Cochrane reviews investigating pain management for childbirth. These reviews all contribute to an overview of systematic reviews of pain management for women in labour, and share a generic protocol. This review updates an earlier version of the review of the same title. Objectives:To examine the effectiveness and safety of hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth. Search methods:We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 September 2015) and the reference lists of primary studies and review articles. Selection criteria:Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTS comparing preparation for labour using hypnosis and/or use of hypnosis during labour, with or without concurrent use of pharmacological or non-pharmacological pain relief methods versus placebo, no treatment or any analgesic drug or technique. Data collection and analysis:Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Where possible we contacted study authors seeking additional information about data and methodology. Main results:We included nine trials randomising a total of 2954 women. The risk of bias in trials was variable, there were several well-designed large trials and some trials where little was reported about trial design. Although eight of the nine trials assessed antenatal hypnotherapy, there were considerable differences between these trials in timing and technique. One trial provided hypnotherapy during labour. In this updated review we compared hypnosis interventions with all control groups (main comparison) and also with specific control conditions: standard care (nine RCTs), supportive counselling (two RCTs) and relaxation training (two RCTs). In the main comparison, women in the hypnosis group were less likely to use pharmacological pain relief or analgesia than those in the control groups, (average risk ratio (RR) 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.94, eight studies, 2916 women; very low-quality evidence; random-effects model). There were no clear differences between women in the hypnosis group and those in the control groups for most of the other primary outcomes. There were no clear differences for sense of coping with labour (MD 0.22, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.58, one study, 420 women; low-quality evidence) or spontaneous vaginal birth (average RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.32, six studies, 2361 women; low-quality evidence; random-effects model). There were no clear differences for satisfaction with pain relief (measured on a seven-point scale two weeks postnatally) for women in the hypnosis group who also received pethidine (MD 0.41, 95% CI -0.45 to 1.27; one study, 72 women), Entonox (MD 0.19, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.57; one study, 357 women), self-hypnosis (MD 0.28, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.88; one study, 160 women), or epidural (MD -0.03, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.34; one study, 127 women), but a slight benefit in favour of hypnosis was seen for women who received water immersion (MD 0.52, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.00; one study, 174 women (all low-quality evidence). There were no clear differences for satisfaction with pain relief when it was measured as the number of women who reported they had adequate pain relief (risk ratio (RR) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.20, one study, 264 women; low-quality evidence). It should be noted that for pharmacological pain relief and spontaneous vaginal birth, there was evidence of considerable statistical heterogeneity, which could not be fully explained by subgroup analysis. For this review's secondary outcomes, no clear differences were found between women in the hypnosis group and women in the control groups for most outcomes where data were available. There was mixed evidence regarding benefits for women in the hypnosis group compared with all control groups for pain intensity, satisfaction with childbirth experience and postnatal depression. For each of these outcomes, data from more than one trial were available for analysis but could not be combined due to differences in measurement methods. There was evidence that fewer women in the hypnosis group stayed in hospital for more than two days after the birth but this finding was based on one small study (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.83). No clear differences between women in the hypnosis group and the control groups were found for the other secondary outcomes where data were available. In the comparisons of hypnosis with specific types of control conditions: standard care, supportive counselling and relaxation training, there were no clear differences found between women in the hypnosis group and those in the standard care control groups or the relaxation control groups for the primary outcomes. Compared with the women in the supportive counselling control group, women in the hypnosis group were less likely to use pharmacological analgesia (average RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.73, two studies, 562 women). They were also more likely to have a spontaneous vaginal birth (RR 2.42, 95% CI 1.43 to 4.07), although this finding was based on the results of one small study. Overall these new comparisons displayed much less statistical heterogeneity than the comparison including all control groups. Authors’ conclusions:There are still only a relatively small number of studies assessing the use of hypnosis for labour and childbirth. Hypnosis may reduce the overall use of analgesia during labour, but not epidural use. No clear differences were found between women in the hypnosis group and those in the control groups for satisfaction with pain relief, sense of coping with labour or spontaneous vaginal birth. Not enough evidence currently exists regarding satisfaction with pain relief or sense of coping with labour and we would encourage any future research to prioritise the measurement of these outcomes. The evidence for the main comparison was assessed using GRADE as being of low quality for all the primary outcomes with downgrading decisions due to concerns regarding inconsistency of the evidence, limitations in design and imprecision. Further research is needed in the form of large, well-designed randomised controlled trials to assess whether hypnosis is of value for pain management during labour and childbirth." @default.
• W2589894937 created "2017-03-03" @default.
• W2589894937 creator A5001875820 @default.
• W2589894937 creator A5003954978 @default.
• W2589894937 creator A5049094141 @default.
• W2589894937 creator A5049849826 @default.
• W2589894937 creator A5053920339 @default.
• W2589894937 date "2016-01-01" @default.
• W2589894937 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2589894937 title "Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth (Review)" @default.
• W2589894937 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2589894937 type Work @default.
• W2589894937 sameAs 2589894937 @default.
• W2589894937 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2589894937 countsByYear W25898949372019 @default.
• W2589894937 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2589894937 hasAuthorship W2589894937A5001875820 @default.
• W2589894937 hasAuthorship W2589894937A5003954978 @default.
• W2589894937 hasAuthorship W2589894937A5049094141 @default.
• W2589894937 hasAuthorship W2589894937A5049849826 @default.
• W2589894937 hasAuthorship W2589894937A5053920339 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C27081682 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C2779703513 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C2780385302 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C2780820201 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C514803892 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C118552586 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C126322002 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C141071460 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C142724271 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C159110408 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C168563851 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C17744445 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C1862650 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C189708586 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C199539241 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C204787440 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C27081682 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C27415008 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C2779234561 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C2779473830 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C2779703513 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C2780385302 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C2780820201 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C514803892 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C535046627 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C54355233 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C71924100 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C86803240 @default.
• W2589894937 hasConceptScore W2589894937C95190672 @default.
• W2589894937 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2589894937 hasLocation W25898949371 @default.
• W2589894937 hasOpenAccess W2589894937 @default.
• W2589894937 hasPrimaryLocation W25898949371 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W1567689647 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W1584043970 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W1685040618 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W1820849977 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W1924243490 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W1944626957 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W1982325404 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W2050897806 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W2056724188 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W2134258291 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W2155759947 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W2162669795 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W2414702405 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W2509067244 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W2568035850 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W2588319336 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W2805683658 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W3135271780 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W996272818 @default.
• W2589894937 hasRelatedWork W2101511633 @default.
• W2589894937 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2589894937 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2589894937 magId "2589894937" @default.
• W2589894937 workType "article" @default.