Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2592006169> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 73 of
73
with 100 items per page.
- W2592006169 abstract "The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable “searches and seizures,” but in the digital age of stingray devices and IP tracking, what constitutes a search or seizure? The Supreme Court has held that the threshold question is supposed to depend on and reflect the “reasonable expectations” of ordinary members of the public concerning their own privacy. For example, the police now exploit the “third party” doctrine to access data held by email and cell phone providers, without securing a warrant, on the Supreme Court’s intuition that the public has no expectation of privacy in that information. Is that assumption correct? If judges’ intuitions about privacy do not reflect actual public expectations, it may undermine the legitimacy of the criminal justice system and exacerbate social unrest.Although prior research has shown that the police disproportionately target younger people and minority communities, judges tend to be male, white, educated, affluent, and older than the general population. Their intuitions may thus be systematically different. Even worse, cognitive science suggests that judges may have difficulty putting themselves into the shoes of the searched person or considering the reasonableness of the police tactics from an ex ante perspective, without knowledge about the fruits of the search.With 1200 respondents, we conducted a large-scale survey experiment to test whether, and if so, why, contemporary Fourth Amendment jurisprudence diverges from the societal norms it purports to protect and reflect. We identify a range of privacy expectations for 18 different police practices. We use oversampling, reweighting, and randomization to investigate particular causes of this disparity between judicial and public expectations. We conclude by suggesting better ways forward, so that social science evidence can replace judicial speculation." @default.
- W2592006169 created "2017-03-16" @default.
- W2592006169 creator A5013965914 @default.
- W2592006169 creator A5016962908 @default.
- W2592006169 creator A5025958094 @default.
- W2592006169 creator A5061781581 @default.
- W2592006169 date "2017-02-23" @default.
- W2592006169 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2592006169 title "Why Courts Fail to Protect Privacy: Race, Age, Bias, and Technology" @default.
- W2592006169 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2592006169 type Work @default.
- W2592006169 sameAs 2592006169 @default.
- W2592006169 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2592006169 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W2592006169 hasAuthorship W2592006169A5013965914 @default.
- W2592006169 hasAuthorship W2592006169A5016962908 @default.
- W2592006169 hasAuthorship W2592006169A5025958094 @default.
- W2592006169 hasAuthorship W2592006169A5061781581 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConcept C102587632 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConcept C2776916960 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConcept C2778910426 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConcept C46295352 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConcept C69775031 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConceptScore W2592006169C10138342 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConceptScore W2592006169C102587632 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConceptScore W2592006169C144024400 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConceptScore W2592006169C144133560 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConceptScore W2592006169C149923435 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConceptScore W2592006169C17744445 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConceptScore W2592006169C199539241 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConceptScore W2592006169C2776916960 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConceptScore W2592006169C2778272461 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConceptScore W2592006169C2778910426 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConceptScore W2592006169C2908647359 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConceptScore W2592006169C46295352 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConceptScore W2592006169C69775031 @default.
- W2592006169 hasConceptScore W2592006169C94625758 @default.
- W2592006169 hasLocation W25920061691 @default.
- W2592006169 hasOpenAccess W2592006169 @default.
- W2592006169 hasPrimaryLocation W25920061691 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W1826578159 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W190288925 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W2106899382 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W2184290084 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W2313628751 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W2505427170 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W2620701561 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W2626002090 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W2752940917 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W2773183688 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W2799535802 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W2964255861 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W3121455325 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W3121887673 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W3122827120 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W3123278244 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W3124080733 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W3125516011 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W3173588435 @default.
- W2592006169 hasRelatedWork W3209685581 @default.
- W2592006169 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2592006169 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2592006169 magId "2592006169" @default.
- W2592006169 workType "article" @default.