FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2592029291> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2592029291 endingPage "265" @default.
• W2592029291 startingPage "248" @default.
• W2592029291 abstract "IntroductionRelevance of the research. Dolan et al. (2006) argues that leaders and managers today are perhaps facing the biggest challenge in the history, striving with how to create and maintain successful organizations based on what is equally good for business, people and society. Harmonizing the beliefs and values of owners of the company and employees is a vital source of competitive advantage. However, for many organizations development and management of common values system becomes an insurmountable problem because of the lack of the identity and consistency of management. Identity is managed only from the top to bottom, i.e. there is no feedback, the needs of employees, consumers, and other stakeholder groups are perceived insufficiently and/or receive little attention, therefore, the declared values of organization are understood and acceptable not to all members of organization (Juscius, 2009; Vveinhardt, Andriukaitiene, 2015; Zukauskas, Vveinhardt, 2009). In the recent decades this issue is increasingly discussed both in business practice and in scientific literature, however, it is still not easy to answer the crucial question of how to put values in actions. It is often debated that organizations often only formally incorporate values provision into their management schemes and structures. As a result, the gap between publicly declared values, ideals of organization and actual practice inevitably occurs. Therefore, lasting organizational values must be shaped omitting the contradiction with the values of individuals and groups, but by combining them, transferring the best values of each member of the organization to the common system of values, which is purposefully managed in practice of organizational activities. According to Dolan et al. (2006) management by values is a relatively new approach to governance and organizational practice concerned with developing management systems that are capable of integrating values into organizational strategies, policies, procedures, and programs.The research aims to find out how certain organizations work with values in their practice and identify possible reasons for strong value congruence in some organizations.The central problem of the research is posed by the question: what ways of strengthening the congruence of personal and organizational values are applied in organizations from the viewpoint of executives and how to harmonize individual employees' values and those prevailing in the organization?Problem exploration level: a wide range of scientists have explored value congruence phenomenon ant it's impact on employee and organization (Meglino, Ravlin, 1998; Verplanken, 2004; Edwards, Cable, 2009; Hoffman et al., 2011). There have been many empirical studies that have examined the value congruence phenomenon positive affect on job satisfaction, organizational commitment and negative affect on turnover intention (Westerman, Cyr, 2004; Ostroffet al., 2005; Amos, Weathington, 2008; Ren, Hamann, 2015), employees' motivation (Lawrence, 2006; Posner, 2010; Ren, 2010). Previous researches have established a significant correlation between levels of stress and higher incongruence, which is ultimately manifested by a value conflict, leads to high levels of stress and to possibly even leaving the organization (Liedtka, 1989; Bouckenooghe et al., 2005; Medina et al., 2005; Lamm et al., 2010). A variety of types are used to conduct a comprehensive personal and organizational value congruence analysis in organizations: subjective (Cable, Edwards, 2004; Verplanken, 2004; Edwards, Cable, 2009), perceived (Kallas et al., 2010; Hoffman et al., 2011), objective (Suar, Khuntia, 2010) and even triangulation (Knoppen et al., 2006). However, qualitative case studies that have examined causes of the congruence between employees' values and organization values from executives' perspectives, have not been found.Limitations of the research. This study analyses values congruence only from executives' perspective. …" @default.
• W2592029291 created "2017-03-16" @default.
• W2592029291 creator A5018006101 @default.
• W2592029291 creator A5060137308 @default.
• W2592029291 creator A5071215246 @default.
• W2592029291 date "2016-06-01" @default.
• W2592029291 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2592029291 title "Values Congruence from the Executives’ Viewpoint: Value-Based Practices" @default.
• W2592029291 cites W115394847 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W1554873345 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W1598962301 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W1847708710 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W1863574485 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W1964366987 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W1969714747 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W1970409515 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W1974803012 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W1978171096 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W1982055310 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W1985882585 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W1987054466 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W1993206200 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W1995779312 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W1995844396 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2001249620 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2011086041 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2020244520 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2026948539 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2037422563 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2039196249 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2052408648 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2052524351 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2056233030 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2059813540 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2062639593 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2070365963 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2082842666 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2083930995 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2085045337 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2086507364 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2088035114 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2102617583 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2103880561 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2109421605 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2110448961 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2121088873 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2126611852 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2130191558 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2130370951 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2137571357 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2159089416 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2169128259 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2214958017 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2235491175 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2888144141 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2993376986 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W3126115483 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W3157756465 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W3166626867 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W426375218 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W623937756 @default.
• W2592029291 cites W2032246498 @default.
• W2592029291 doi "https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2016/9-2/17" @default.
• W2592029291 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2592029291 type Work @default.
• W2592029291 sameAs 2592029291 @default.
• W2592029291 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2592029291 countsByYear W25920292912021 @default.
• W2592029291 countsByYear W25920292912023 @default.
• W2592029291 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2592029291 hasAuthorship W2592029291A5018006101 @default.
• W2592029291 hasAuthorship W2592029291A5060137308 @default.
• W2592029291 hasAuthorship W2592029291A5071215246 @default.
• W2592029291 hasBestOaLocation W25920292911 @default.
• W2592029291 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2592029291 hasConcept C132074034 @default.
• W2592029291 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2592029291 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2592029291 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W2592029291 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2592029291 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2592029291 hasConceptScore W2592029291C105795698 @default.
• W2592029291 hasConceptScore W2592029291C132074034 @default.
• W2592029291 hasConceptScore W2592029291C144133560 @default.
• W2592029291 hasConceptScore W2592029291C15744967 @default.
• W2592029291 hasConceptScore W2592029291C2776291640 @default.
• W2592029291 hasConceptScore W2592029291C33923547 @default.
• W2592029291 hasConceptScore W2592029291C77805123 @default.
• W2592029291 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2592029291 hasLocation W25920292911 @default.
• W2592029291 hasOpenAccess W2592029291 @default.
• W2592029291 hasPrimaryLocation W25920292911 @default.
• W2592029291 hasRelatedWork W2130487395 @default.
• W2592029291 hasRelatedWork W2354789018 @default.
• W2592029291 hasRelatedWork W2388471861 @default.
• W2592029291 hasRelatedWork W2391316944 @default.
• W2592029291 hasRelatedWork W2730783359 @default.
• W2592029291 hasRelatedWork W2787537126 @default.

• next