FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2593651211> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2593651211 endingPage "2019" @default.
• W2593651211 startingPage "2011" @default.
• W2593651211 abstract "Purpose Mathematical modeling is a powerful and flexible method to investigate complex phenomena. It discloses the possibility of reproducing expensive as well as invasive experiments in a safe environment with limited costs. This makes it suitable to mimic tumor evolution and response to radiotherapy although the reliability of the results remains an issue. Complexity reduction is therefore a critical aspect in order to be able to compare model outcomes to clinical data. Among the factors affecting treatment efficacy, tumor oxygenation is known to play a key role in radiotherapy response. In this work, we aim at relating the oxygenation dynamics, predicted by a macroscale model trained on tumor volumetric data of uterine cervical cancer patients, to vascularization and blood flux indices assessed on Ultrasound Doppler images. Methods We propose a macroscale model of tumor evolution based on three dynamics, namely active portion, necrotic portion, and oxygenation. The model parameters were assessed on the volume size of seven cervical cancer patients administered with 28 fractions of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) (1.8 Gy/fraction). For each patient, five Doppler ultrasound tests were acquired before, during, and after the treatment. The lesion was manually contoured by an expert physician using 4D View® (General Electric Company - Fairfield, Connecticut, United States), which automatically provided the overall tumor volume size along with three vascularization and/or blood flow indices. Volume data only were fed to the model for training purpose, while the predicted oxygenation was compared a posteriori to the measured Doppler indices. Results The model was able to fit the tumor volume evolution within 8% error (range: 3–8%). A strong correlation between the intrapatient longitudinal indices from Doppler measurements and oxygen predicted by the model (about 90% or above) was found in three cases. Two patients showed an average correlation value (50–70%) and the remaining two presented poor correlations. The latter patients were the ones featuring the smallest tumor reduction throughout the treatment, typical of hypoxic conditions. Moreover, the average oxygenation value predicted by the model was close to the average vascularization-flow index (average difference: 7%). Conclusions The results suggest that the modeled relation between tumor evolution and oxygen dynamics was reasonable enough to provide realistic oxygenation curves in five cases (correlation greater than 50%) out of seven. In case of nonresponsive tumors, the model failed in predicting the oxygenation trend while succeeded in reproducing the average oxygenation value according to the mean vascularization-flow index. Despite the need for deeper investigations, the outcomes of the present work support the hypothesis that a simple macroscale model of tumor response to radiotherapy is able to predict the tumor oxygenation. The possibility of an objective and quantitative validation on imaging data discloses the possibility to translate them as decision support tools in clinical practice and to move a step forward in the treatment personalization." @default.
• W2593651211 created "2017-03-16" @default.
• W2593651211 creator A5000570208 @default.
• W2593651211 creator A5025460525 @default.
• W2593651211 creator A5026922940 @default.
• W2593651211 creator A5053972376 @default.
• W2593651211 creator A5056235763 @default.
• W2593651211 creator A5065673319 @default.
• W2593651211 creator A5068250967 @default.
• W2593651211 creator A5070972279 @default.
• W2593651211 creator A5079877840 @default.
• W2593651211 creator A5088168853 @default.
• W2593651211 date "2017-04-13" @default.
• W2593651211 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2593651211 title "Comparison between model-predicted tumor oxygenation dynamics and vascular-/flow-related Doppler indices" @default.
• W2593651211 cites W10325798 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W1512206713 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W1526127848 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W1583775085 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W1653443644 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W1964254408 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W1969697457 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W1971747664 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W1977281992 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W1978344596 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W1980020949 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W1987846933 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W1990086268 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W1990497183 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W1995625136 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W1997122877 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W1998235211 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2000156247 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2004900984 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2023774039 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2024918849 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2027179739 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2027501539 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2032543826 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2037179242 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2039323901 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2042855386 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2045372721 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2050277690 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2050384133 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2060683289 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2065974430 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2068235022 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2071827829 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2071974770 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2075647502 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2076761842 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2080833794 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2087775476 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2091761369 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2116638751 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2123725304 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2124496728 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2141436066 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2271911140 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2296275884 @default.
• W2593651211 cites W2334057184 @default.
• W2593651211 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12192" @default.
• W2593651211 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28273332" @default.
• W2593651211 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2593651211 type Work @default.
• W2593651211 sameAs 2593651211 @default.
• W2593651211 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2593651211 countsByYear W25936512112018 @default.
• W2593651211 countsByYear W25936512112023 @default.
• W2593651211 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2593651211 hasAuthorship W2593651211A5000570208 @default.
• W2593651211 hasAuthorship W2593651211A5025460525 @default.
• W2593651211 hasAuthorship W2593651211A5026922940 @default.
• W2593651211 hasAuthorship W2593651211A5053972376 @default.
• W2593651211 hasAuthorship W2593651211A5056235763 @default.
• W2593651211 hasAuthorship W2593651211A5065673319 @default.
• W2593651211 hasAuthorship W2593651211A5068250967 @default.
• W2593651211 hasAuthorship W2593651211A5070972279 @default.
• W2593651211 hasAuthorship W2593651211A5079877840 @default.
• W2593651211 hasAuthorship W2593651211A5088168853 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConcept C142757262 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConcept C158846371 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConcept C70289976 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConceptScore W2593651211C121332964 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConceptScore W2593651211C126322002 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConceptScore W2593651211C126838900 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConceptScore W2593651211C1276947 @default.
• W2593651211 hasConceptScore W2593651211C136229726 @default.

• next