FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2593901620> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2593901620 endingPage "68" @default.
• W2593901620 startingPage "62" @default.
• W2593901620 abstract "Objective “Lisfranc joint injury” is comprised of a tarsometatarsal joint-complex injury. The Lisfranc complex injury is always a challenge for orthopedists, and the optimum treatment is still up for debate. Anatomic reduction and stable internal fixation prove to have no satisfactory outcomes. This research aims to compare the clinical curative effects, complications and radiographic features of arthrodesis and non-fusion of the Lisfranc joint in the follow-up of the patients who suffered Lisfranc injuries. Methods A comparative retrospective study of 25 patients with acute or subacute Lisfranc complex injuries was conducted between September 2013 and March 2015 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. All patients were classified by Myerson classification. Eight patients were treated with arthrodesis, while 17 patients received non-fusion operations. The clinical curative effects, complications and image differences were compared between the two groups. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score were evaluated for each patient during the follow-up. All statistics were analyzed using the SPSS software system. Results All fractures healed for both the arthrodesis group and the non-fusion group. Patients in the arthrodesis group had a higher AOFAS score compared with patients in the non-fusion group (94.00 vs. 88.58, P = 0.034). Complications occurred in eight patients (8/17, 47%) in the non-arthrodesis group, including the second and third phalanx abduction (1), talipes cavus (2), eversion deformity of front foot (3), eversion deformity of calcaneus (1), as well as postoperative infection (1). Only two patients (2/8, 25%) in the arthrodesis group suffered complications. One was a limitation of motion of the front foot and pain during walking; the other was an eversion deformity of front foot. Conclusion Primary arthrodesis has advantages compared to primary open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF): reduced foot deformity rates, sustained biomechanical morphology of the feet, reduced complications, higher level of function recovery, shorter time of surgical procedures, fewer complications, higher AOFAS score and fewer frequency of complications. According to our research, primary arthrodesis may be a better choice for treating Lisfranc injury." @default.
• W2593901620 created "2017-03-16" @default.
• W2593901620 creator A5012164494 @default.
• W2593901620 creator A5017857303 @default.
• W2593901620 creator A5028913838 @default.
• W2593901620 creator A5040520044 @default.
• W2593901620 creator A5048712420 @default.
• W2593901620 creator A5062215931 @default.
• W2593901620 creator A5062820998 @default.
• W2593901620 creator A5069651760 @default.
• W2593901620 creator A5079306986 @default.
• W2593901620 date "2017-02-01" @default.
• W2593901620 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2593901620 title "Comparison of Arthrodesis and Non-fusion to Treat Lisfranc Injuries" @default.
• W2593901620 cites W1856045586 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W1867816809 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W1869873817 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W1869950695 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W1972097567 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W1977002398 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W1977441479 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W1985851168 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W1991523119 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W1997878229 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2008023444 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2011054990 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2025038303 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2026506961 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2028104353 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2036640552 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2037702664 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2064340034 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2107873713 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2116133663 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2126706444 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2133919562 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2137486462 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2149650209 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2164870846 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2167393705 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2169136020 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2169339754 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2241092199 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2284211104 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2311248977 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W2791670055 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W41541419 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W4243734605 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W4245061977 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W4250628242 @default.
• W2593901620 cites W4367720757 @default.
• W2593901620 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12316" @default.
• W2593901620 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6584468" @default.
• W2593901620 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28276650" @default.
• W2593901620 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2593901620 type Work @default.
• W2593901620 sameAs 2593901620 @default.
• W2593901620 citedByCount "31" @default.
• W2593901620 countsByYear W25939016202018 @default.
• W2593901620 countsByYear W25939016202019 @default.
• W2593901620 countsByYear W25939016202020 @default.
• W2593901620 countsByYear W25939016202021 @default.
• W2593901620 countsByYear W25939016202022 @default.
• W2593901620 countsByYear W25939016202023 @default.
• W2593901620 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2593901620 hasAuthorship W2593901620A5012164494 @default.
• W2593901620 hasAuthorship W2593901620A5017857303 @default.
• W2593901620 hasAuthorship W2593901620A5028913838 @default.
• W2593901620 hasAuthorship W2593901620A5040520044 @default.
• W2593901620 hasAuthorship W2593901620A5048712420 @default.
• W2593901620 hasAuthorship W2593901620A5062215931 @default.
• W2593901620 hasAuthorship W2593901620A5062820998 @default.
• W2593901620 hasAuthorship W2593901620A5069651760 @default.
• W2593901620 hasAuthorship W2593901620A5079306986 @default.
• W2593901620 hasBestOaLocation W25939016201 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConcept C2775882903 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConcept C2776889875 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConcept C2778640784 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConcept C2778687708 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConcept C2778867527 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConcept C2779982284 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConcept C2780660378 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConcept C2781298600 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConcept C2909302877 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConcept C2910784643 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConceptScore W2593901620C141071460 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConceptScore W2593901620C142724271 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConceptScore W2593901620C204787440 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConceptScore W2593901620C2775882903 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConceptScore W2593901620C2776889875 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConceptScore W2593901620C2778640784 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConceptScore W2593901620C2778687708 @default.
• W2593901620 hasConceptScore W2593901620C2778867527 @default.

• next