FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2594395410> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2594395410 endingPage "529" @default.
• W2594395410 startingPage "521" @default.
• W2594395410 abstract "Rationale and Objectives The purpose of this study was to critically appraise and compare the diagnostic performance of imaging modalities that are used for the diagnosis of intussusception and methods used in the treatment of ileocolic intussusception. Methods A focused clinical question was constructed and the literature was searched using the patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) method comparing radiography, ultrasound, and computed tomography in the detection of intussusception. The same methods were used to compare pneumatic (gas) reduction and hydrostatic (liquid) reduction using saline, water-soluble contrast, and barium. Retrieved articles were appraised and assigned a level of evidence based on the Oxford University Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine hierarchy of validity for diagnostic studies. Results The retrieved sensitivity for the diagnosis of intussusception using plain radiography is 48% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44%–52%), with a specificity of 21% (95% CI, 18%–24%). The retrieved sensitivity for the diagnosis of intussusception using ultrasound is 97.9% (95% CI, 95%–100%), with a specificity of 97.8% (95% CI, 97%–99%). Based on a good quality meta-analysis, the combined success rate of gas enema reduction was shown to be 82.7% (95% CI, 79.9%–85.6%) compared to a combined success rate of 69.6% (95% CI, 65.0%–74.1%) for liquid enema reduction. Conclusions The best available evidence recommends ultrasound as the diagnostic modality of choice for the diagnosis of ileocolic intussusception in children. In stable children without signs of peritonism, nonoperative reduction is the treatment of choice. Pneumatic (gas) reduction enema has been shown to be superior to hydrostatic (liquid) enema reduction. The purpose of this study was to critically appraise and compare the diagnostic performance of imaging modalities that are used for the diagnosis of intussusception and methods used in the treatment of ileocolic intussusception. A focused clinical question was constructed and the literature was searched using the patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) method comparing radiography, ultrasound, and computed tomography in the detection of intussusception. The same methods were used to compare pneumatic (gas) reduction and hydrostatic (liquid) reduction using saline, water-soluble contrast, and barium. Retrieved articles were appraised and assigned a level of evidence based on the Oxford University Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine hierarchy of validity for diagnostic studies. The retrieved sensitivity for the diagnosis of intussusception using plain radiography is 48% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44%–52%), with a specificity of 21% (95% CI, 18%–24%). The retrieved sensitivity for the diagnosis of intussusception using ultrasound is 97.9% (95% CI, 95%–100%), with a specificity of 97.8% (95% CI, 97%–99%). Based on a good quality meta-analysis, the combined success rate of gas enema reduction was shown to be 82.7% (95% CI, 79.9%–85.6%) compared to a combined success rate of 69.6% (95% CI, 65.0%–74.1%) for liquid enema reduction. The best available evidence recommends ultrasound as the diagnostic modality of choice for the diagnosis of ileocolic intussusception in children. In stable children without signs of peritonism, nonoperative reduction is the treatment of choice. Pneumatic (gas) reduction enema has been shown to be superior to hydrostatic (liquid) enema reduction." @default.
• W2594395410 created "2017-03-16" @default.
• W2594395410 creator A5000943391 @default.
• W2594395410 creator A5010871224 @default.
• W2594395410 creator A5038214654 @default.
• W2594395410 creator A5063901046 @default.
• W2594395410 creator A5083560540 @default.
• W2594395410 creator A5087407688 @default.
• W2594395410 date "2017-05-01" @default.
• W2594395410 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2594395410 title "Comparative Effectiveness of Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Intussusception" @default.
• W2594395410 cites W143981641 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W1889653459 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W1898444623 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W194964095 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W1971569926 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W1972532528 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W1977950355 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W1982761149 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W1992830937 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W1998049080 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W1999878123 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W2003422272 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W2004136298 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W2009185316 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W2011074715 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W2026546400 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W2046442927 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W2073607379 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W2074209944 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W2117283680 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W2126171156 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W2138455268 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W2170149491 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W2179523896 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W2405551151 @default.
• W2594395410 cites W2883018688 @default.
• W2594395410 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.01.002" @default.
• W2594395410 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28268146" @default.
• W2594395410 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2594395410 type Work @default.
• W2594395410 sameAs 2594395410 @default.
• W2594395410 citedByCount "37" @default.
• W2594395410 countsByYear W25943954102017 @default.
• W2594395410 countsByYear W25943954102019 @default.
• W2594395410 countsByYear W25943954102020 @default.
• W2594395410 countsByYear W25943954102021 @default.
• W2594395410 countsByYear W25943954102022 @default.
• W2594395410 countsByYear W25943954102023 @default.
• W2594395410 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2594395410 hasAuthorship W2594395410A5000943391 @default.
• W2594395410 hasAuthorship W2594395410A5010871224 @default.
• W2594395410 hasAuthorship W2594395410A5038214654 @default.
• W2594395410 hasAuthorship W2594395410A5063901046 @default.
• W2594395410 hasAuthorship W2594395410A5083560540 @default.
• W2594395410 hasAuthorship W2594395410A5087407688 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConcept C2776530707 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConcept C2777831738 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConcept C2993362636 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConceptScore W2594395410C121608353 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConceptScore W2594395410C126322002 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConceptScore W2594395410C126838900 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConceptScore W2594395410C141071460 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConceptScore W2594395410C143753070 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConceptScore W2594395410C2776530707 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConceptScore W2594395410C2777831738 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConceptScore W2594395410C2778435480 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConceptScore W2594395410C2993362636 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConceptScore W2594395410C44249647 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConceptScore W2594395410C526805850 @default.
• W2594395410 hasConceptScore W2594395410C71924100 @default.
• W2594395410 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2594395410 hasLocation W25943954101 @default.
• W2594395410 hasLocation W25943954102 @default.
• W2594395410 hasOpenAccess W2594395410 @default.
• W2594395410 hasPrimaryLocation W25943954101 @default.
• W2594395410 hasRelatedWork W1494605804 @default.
• W2594395410 hasRelatedWork W1964646901 @default.
• W2594395410 hasRelatedWork W1995563797 @default.
• W2594395410 hasRelatedWork W2069999656 @default.
• W2594395410 hasRelatedWork W2318924449 @default.
• W2594395410 hasRelatedWork W2379914195 @default.
• W2594395410 hasRelatedWork W2432355470 @default.
• W2594395410 hasRelatedWork W4298305613 @default.
• W2594395410 hasRelatedWork W73487388 @default.
• W2594395410 hasRelatedWork W2184199623 @default.
• W2594395410 hasVolume "24" @default.
• W2594395410 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2594395410 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next