FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2595043082> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2595043082 startingPage "537" @default.
• W2595043082 abstract "On June 4, 1997, James E. Woodfin (Woodfin) was shot to death in his apartment by a police officer employed by the Knoxville Police Department (KPD).1 The events leading up to the shooting incident began about one month earlier, when Woodfin entered a Revco Discount Drug Store (Revco) in Knoxville, Tennessee, on May 4, 1997, and caused a considerable disruption. Revco's security guard, an off-duty KPD officer named Danny Boone (Boone), issued Woodfin a misdemeanor citation for disorderly conduct and warned Woodfin never to return to Revco.3 About one month later, Boone was again working as Revco's security guard when Revco's manager informed Boone that Woodfin violated his warning by entering Revco a few days earlier.4 When Boone called the KPD to inquire about the status of Woodfin's May 4 citation, learned that Woodfin failed to report to the jail for 'booking' on May 19 as ordered by the citation and that a bench warrant had been issued for Woodfin's arrest.5 Before going to Woodfin's apartment, Boone called four or five uniformed KPD officers to accompany him.6 Upon arrival, they discovered that Woodfin had locked himself inside the apartment and that would not allow anyone to enter.7 After obtaining a key to the apartment from a maintenance person, Boone and the officers entered the apartment to find that Woodfin had locked himself in the bathroom. Woodfin threatened that he had a shotgun pointed at the bathroom door and that would shoot anyone who entered.9 One of the officers kicked open the bathroom door and fired his weapon, wounding Woodfin in the stomach and ultimately causing his death. 10 The Plaintiffs IT filed a wrongful death suit for the shooting death of Woodfin by the KPD officers.12 The complaint alleged that the use of such deadly force by the officers against Woodfin was unreasonable and unnecessary to accomplish an arrest on a misdemeanor warrant.13 The Plaintiffs argued that Revco was liable for Boone's actions under the doctrine of respondeat superior because Boone acted `as an agent' for Revco, is According to the Plaintiffs, all times relevant to the action, Boone was working as a private security guard for Revco and ... was acting `under the direction, consent, control, and within the scope of his employment with Revco. `15 Revco filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, claiming that the [P]laintiffs failed to allege sufficient facts setting forth a cause of action because `Boone, as a matter of law, was acting solely within the scope of his duty as a police officer.16 Thus, Boone could not be considered an employee or agent of Revco. 17 After the trial court granted Revco's motion to dismiss, the Plaintiffs appealed to the court of appeals.18 The court of appeals adopted a test to examine the nature of the police officer's activities during the events leading up to the cause of action.19 Here, the appellate court determined that Boone's actions reflected 'a vindication of a public right,' thereby compelling the conclusion that Boone could only have been acting in his official capacity as a Knoxville police officer. …" @default.
• W2595043082 created "2017-03-23" @default.
• W2595043082 creator A5007761761 @default.
• W2595043082 date "2002-01-01" @default.
• W2595043082 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2595043082 title "Torts-White V. Revco Discount Drug Centers: Should Private Employers Be Held Liable for the Negligence of Off-Duty Police Officers Employed for Private Security Purposes?" @default.
• W2595043082 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2595043082 type Work @default.
• W2595043082 sameAs 2595043082 @default.
• W2595043082 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2595043082 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2595043082 hasAuthorship W2595043082A5007761761 @default.
• W2595043082 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2595043082 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2595043082 hasConcept C2777189325 @default.
• W2595043082 hasConcept C2778252816 @default.
• W2595043082 hasConcept C2992838255 @default.
• W2595043082 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2595043082 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2595043082 hasConceptScore W2595043082C17744445 @default.
• W2595043082 hasConceptScore W2595043082C199539241 @default.
• W2595043082 hasConceptScore W2595043082C2777189325 @default.
• W2595043082 hasConceptScore W2595043082C2778252816 @default.
• W2595043082 hasConceptScore W2595043082C2992838255 @default.
• W2595043082 hasConceptScore W2595043082C38652104 @default.
• W2595043082 hasConceptScore W2595043082C41008148 @default.
• W2595043082 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2595043082 hasLocation W25950430821 @default.
• W2595043082 hasOpenAccess W2595043082 @default.
• W2595043082 hasPrimaryLocation W25950430821 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W1066021023 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W11140458 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W1272071412 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W202170321 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W2117636551 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W2203706131 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W221386859 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W237098460 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W2606461284 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W2611522091 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W2994526525 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W309219069 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W3123723498 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W32454451 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W58439426 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W71306437 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W778366890 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W9373352 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W96182767 @default.
• W2595043082 hasRelatedWork W2565479468 @default.
• W2595043082 hasVolume "32" @default.
• W2595043082 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2595043082 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2595043082 magId "2595043082" @default.
• W2595043082 workType "article" @default.