FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2595461535> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2595461535 endingPage "1360" @default.
• W2595461535 startingPage "1359" @default.
• W2595461535 abstract "Although the advantages of rigid over wire fixation for patients with mandibular advancement are widely recognized, the severity of inferior alveolar nerve damage has been particularly difficult to compare. In contrast to other standardized outcome measures (eg, cephalometric analyses), there is little consensus as to which tests of neurosensory function should be used, how the tests should be administered, or how the results should be interpreted and reported. As such, comparison of published clinical studies in which either rigid or wire fixation was employed has provided conflicting information. Similarly, comparison of clinical data retrospectively at the same institution has been problematic because of the “selective and subjective” nature of neurosensory information in patient records. 1 Buckley MJ Tulloch JFC White RP et al. Complications of orthognathic surgery: A comparison between wire fixation and rigid internal fixation. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1989; 4: 69 PubMed Google Scholar Given these considerations, multicenter, randomized clinical trials are crucial to the identification of differences in neurosensory complications and their clinical implications. Although such studies were in progress 10 years ago, 2 Hatch JP Rugh JD Bays RA et al. Psychological function in orthognathic surgical patients before and after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with rigid and wire fixation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 115: 536 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar this report by Lemke et al is the first to address specifically whether rigid fixation results in greater neurosensory impairment than does wire fixation. The analyses provide valuable insight, but 2 concerns remain largely unresolved. First, the 2 tests of neurosensory function (light touch detection and brush stroke direction) were found to provide different results statistically. Second, the implications of the difference in the thresholds for brush stroke direction are unclear with regard to the risk for, and the severity of, neurosensory impairment after rigid versus wire fixation." @default.
• W2595461535 created "2017-03-23" @default.
• W2595461535 creator A5005905633 @default.
• W2595461535 date "2000-12-01" @default.
• W2595461535 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2595461535 title "Discussion" @default.
• W2595461535 cites W1986475657 @default.
• W2595461535 cites W2000691636 @default.
• W2595461535 cites W2004581822 @default.
• W2595461535 cites W2059142424 @default.
• W2595461535 cites W2073581451 @default.
• W2595461535 cites W2082977170 @default.
• W2595461535 cites W2095124028 @default.
• W2595461535 cites W2100039459 @default.
• W2595461535 cites W2109271501 @default.
• W2595461535 cites W2132518685 @default.
• W2595461535 cites W2171386063 @default.
• W2595461535 cites W3126649847 @default.
• W2595461535 doi "https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2000.18262" @default.
• W2595461535 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W2595461535 type Work @default.
• W2595461535 sameAs 2595461535 @default.
• W2595461535 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2595461535 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2595461535 hasAuthorship W2595461535A5005905633 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConcept C178910020 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConcept C2775856749 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConcept C2776347944 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConceptScore W2595461535C126838900 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConceptScore W2595461535C141071460 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConceptScore W2595461535C146249460 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConceptScore W2595461535C178910020 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConceptScore W2595461535C202271784 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConceptScore W2595461535C2775856749 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConceptScore W2595461535C2776347944 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConceptScore W2595461535C2908647359 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConceptScore W2595461535C29694066 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConceptScore W2595461535C71924100 @default.
• W2595461535 hasConceptScore W2595461535C99454951 @default.
• W2595461535 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W2595461535 hasLocation W25954615351 @default.
• W2595461535 hasOpenAccess W2595461535 @default.
• W2595461535 hasPrimaryLocation W25954615351 @default.
• W2595461535 hasRelatedWork W1716771220 @default.
• W2595461535 hasRelatedWork W195948924 @default.
• W2595461535 hasRelatedWork W1964502450 @default.
• W2595461535 hasRelatedWork W2026570819 @default.
• W2595461535 hasRelatedWork W2322756788 @default.
• W2595461535 hasRelatedWork W2945594410 @default.
• W2595461535 hasRelatedWork W3012893869 @default.
• W2595461535 hasRelatedWork W3112839304 @default.
• W2595461535 hasRelatedWork W4295758416 @default.
• W2595461535 hasRelatedWork W3084313730 @default.
• W2595461535 hasVolume "58" @default.
• W2595461535 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2595461535 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2595461535 magId "2595461535" @default.
• W2595461535 workType "article" @default.