FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2600675087> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2600675087 endingPage "2506" @default.
• W2600675087 startingPage "2499" @default.
• W2600675087 abstract "Purpose The goals of immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction are to minimize deformity and optimize quality of life as perceived by patients. We prospectively evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in women undergoing immediate implant-based or autologous reconstruction. Methods Women undergoing immediate postmastectomy reconstruction for invasive cancer and/or carcinoma in situ were enrolled at 11 sites. Women underwent implant-based or autologous tissue reconstruction. Patients completed the BREAST-Q, a condition-specific PRO measure for breast surgery patients, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System–29, a generic PRO measure, before and 1 year after surgery. Mean changes in PRO scores were summarized. Mixed-effects regression models were used to compare PRO scores across procedure types. Results In total, 1,632 patients (n = 1,139 implant, n = 493 autologous) were included; 1,183 (72.5%) responded to 1-year questionnaires. After analysis was controlled for baseline values, patients who underwent autologous reconstruction had greater satisfaction with their breasts than those who underwent implant-based reconstruction (difference, 6.3; P < .001), greater sexual well-being (difference, 4.5; P = .003), and greater psychosocial well-being (difference, 3.7; P = .02) at 1 year. Patients in the autologous reconstruction group had improved satisfaction with breasts (difference, 8.0; P = .002) and psychosocial well-being (difference, 4.6; P = .047) compared with preoperative baseline. Physical well-being of the chest was not fully restored in either the implant group (difference, −3.8; P = .001) or autologous group (−2.2; P = .04), nor was physical well-being of the abdomen in patients who underwent autologous reconstruction (−13.4; P < .001). Anxiety and depression were mitigated at 1 year in both groups. Compared with their baseline reports, patients who underwent implant reconstruction had decreased fatigue (difference, −1.4; P = .035), whereas patients who underwent autologous reconstruction had increased pain interference (difference, 2.0; P = .006). Conclusion At 1 year after mastectomy, patients who underwent autologous reconstruction were more satisfied with their breasts and had greater psychosocial and sexual well-being than those who underwent implant reconstruction. Although satisfaction with breasts was equal to or greater than baseline levels, physical well-being was not fully restored. This information can help patients better understand expected outcomes and may guide innovations to improve outcomes." @default.
• W2600675087 created "2017-04-07" @default.
• W2600675087 creator A5001644256 @default.
• W2600675087 creator A5006621039 @default.
• W2600675087 creator A5021613975 @default.
• W2600675087 creator A5030155695 @default.
• W2600675087 creator A5032134663 @default.
• W2600675087 creator A5059862627 @default.
• W2600675087 creator A5062394895 @default.
• W2600675087 creator A5070607937 @default.
• W2600675087 creator A5070748857 @default.
• W2600675087 creator A5072644098 @default.
• W2600675087 creator A5081601479 @default.
• W2600675087 date "2017-08-01" @default.
• W2600675087 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W2600675087 title "Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study" @default.
• W2600675087 cites W1492317881 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W1542600345 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W1556779599 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W1874183889 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W1966606186 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W1971996215 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W1976492856 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W1983651981 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W1991772350 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W1992689360 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W1993773733 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W1995720073 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2007963396 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2024623766 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2029964490 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2030993903 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2037597281 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2043541155 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2047405738 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2064113110 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2069817008 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2075425472 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2076046370 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2079092071 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2079895737 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2096788630 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2109210596 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2109542395 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2112745405 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2116971494 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2117074131 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2117264249 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2117381783 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2128552180 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2150939386 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2154692607 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2154784676 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2176679308 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2177818390 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2187885945 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2255790269 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2294786252 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2302729984 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2323890063 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2334096232 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2345629009 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2407689610 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2408985828 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2413154167 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W2472434905 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W3149944262 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W4230647987 @default.
• W2600675087 cites W4237318787 @default.
• W2600675087 doi "https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.69.9561" @default.
• W2600675087 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5536162" @default.
• W2600675087 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28346808" @default.
• W2600675087 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2600675087 type Work @default.
• W2600675087 sameAs 2600675087 @default.
• W2600675087 citedByCount "216" @default.
• W2600675087 countsByYear W26006750872017 @default.
• W2600675087 countsByYear W26006750872018 @default.
• W2600675087 countsByYear W26006750872019 @default.
• W2600675087 countsByYear W26006750872020 @default.
• W2600675087 countsByYear W26006750872021 @default.
• W2600675087 countsByYear W26006750872022 @default.
• W2600675087 countsByYear W26006750872023 @default.
• W2600675087 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2600675087 hasAuthorship W2600675087A5001644256 @default.
• W2600675087 hasAuthorship W2600675087A5006621039 @default.
• W2600675087 hasAuthorship W2600675087A5021613975 @default.
• W2600675087 hasAuthorship W2600675087A5030155695 @default.
• W2600675087 hasAuthorship W2600675087A5032134663 @default.
• W2600675087 hasAuthorship W2600675087A5059862627 @default.
• W2600675087 hasAuthorship W2600675087A5062394895 @default.
• W2600675087 hasAuthorship W2600675087A5070607937 @default.
• W2600675087 hasAuthorship W2600675087A5070748857 @default.
• W2600675087 hasAuthorship W2600675087A5072644098 @default.
• W2600675087 hasAuthorship W2600675087A5081601479 @default.
• W2600675087 hasBestOaLocation W26006750872 @default.
• W2600675087 hasConcept C111278954 @default.
• W2600675087 hasConcept C118552586 @default.

• next