FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2602445889> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2602445889 startingPage "997" @default.
• W2602445889 abstract "INTRODUCTIONIn many ways, the 2015 term of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit with respect to international trade felt like deja vu. The Federal Circuit heard a number of significant cases this year that it addressed in one or more of the past several terms and either came back as an appeal on a related issue or for an en banc hearing.1 Despite these lengthening cases, very few appeals have found success, especially with regard to overturning antidumping orders.As usual, most of the significant cases this year focused on dumping. Some familiar cases returned to the court with arguments over zeroing, which the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) reversed after a negative World Trade Organization (WTO) ruling,2 and three cases on the Byrd Amendment, which Congress repealed following a negative WTO ruling.3 Additionally, the Federal Circuit heard a number of interesting procedural cases this term, including one establishing value calculations in dumping cases involving nonmarket economies,4 the exhaustion of remedies requirement for seeking relief at the Court of International Trade (CIT),5 and the timing of responses to questionnaires.6 Also, several significant cases arose under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which permits the International Trade Commission (ITC) to investigate and potentially exclude goods that unfairly or unlawfully infringe upon a patent or copyright.This Article is divided into four parts, each designating a specific category of cases. Part I focuses on the prominent number of antidumping and countervailing duty cases. Part II addresses classification cases, which are much more fact specific than other cases in front of the Federal Circuit. Part III discusses procedural cases, which may also overlap with the antidumping topic. Part IV addresses intellectual property cases under section 337. This Article focuses on the significant precedential cases, while excluding nonprecedential and some narrow precedential cases. The Article briefly concludes by describing the Federal Circuit's pattern of deference to the ITC and Commerce.I. ANTIDUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING DUTY CASESAntidumping duties are fees that the United States imposes on merchandise . . . sold in the United States at less than its fair value.7 Countervailing duties are placed on goods that benefit from subsidies that foreign governments provide.8 Commerce investigates and determines whether foreign producers have sold or are likely to sell products or goods at less than fair value in the case of dumping or whether the government has provided a subsidy in the case of countervailing.9 The ITC continues the investigation by assessing whether the imported goods are causing or threatening to cause material injury to a domestic industry in the United States.10 If both inquiries are answered in the affirmative, Commerce issues the relevant antidumping and countervailing duty orders.11The antidumping or countervailing duty investigation process typically begins with a request filed by a domestic party. That initial petition will define the scope of the alleged dumping or subsidy, which will limit the extent of the investigation. Before the investigation begins, Commerce must ensure that the petition was filed on behalf of the relevant domestic industry.12 Numerically, this means that the petition is supported by producers who account for at least [twenty-five] percent of the total production of the domestic like product.13The first antidumping case of the 2015 term before the Federal Circuit addressed the scope of an antidumping order (Order) issued against Chinese manufacturers of certain aluminum extrusions.14 An investigation began into these extrusions in 2010 and concluded with an antidumping order issued on May 26, 2011.15 In October 2012, Walters & Wolf, Bagatelos Architectural Glass Systems, Inc., and Architectural Glass and Aluminum Company submitted an amended scope request to Commerce pursuant to 19 C. …" @default.
• W2602445889 created "2017-04-07" @default.
• W2602445889 creator A5091747603 @default.
• W2602445889 date "2016-03-01" @default.
• W2602445889 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2602445889 title "2015 International Trade Decisions of the Federal Circuit" @default.
• W2602445889 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2602445889 type Work @default.
• W2602445889 sameAs 2602445889 @default.
• W2602445889 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2602445889 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2602445889 hasAuthorship W2602445889A5091747603 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConcept C2776034101 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConcept C2776060655 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConcept C2777626329 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConcept C2778449503 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConcept C2779103253 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConceptScore W2602445889C144133560 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConceptScore W2602445889C155202549 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConceptScore W2602445889C162324750 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConceptScore W2602445889C17744445 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConceptScore W2602445889C199539241 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConceptScore W2602445889C2776034101 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConceptScore W2602445889C2776060655 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConceptScore W2602445889C2777626329 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConceptScore W2602445889C2778449503 @default.
• W2602445889 hasConceptScore W2602445889C2779103253 @default.
• W2602445889 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2602445889 hasLocation W26024458891 @default.
• W2602445889 hasOpenAccess W2602445889 @default.
• W2602445889 hasPrimaryLocation W26024458891 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W1539378642 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W1570085191 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W160228741 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W182814541 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W1968370823 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W1992244335 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W1999684234 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W2019418672 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W2086743118 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W2105281243 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W2112182614 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W2270793770 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W2563609829 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W2583284881 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W3121816402 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W3122342347 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W317179384 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W367106930 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W59469610 @default.
• W2602445889 hasRelatedWork W63894716 @default.
• W2602445889 hasVolume "65" @default.
• W2602445889 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2602445889 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2602445889 magId "2602445889" @default.
• W2602445889 workType "article" @default.