FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2602496171> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2602496171 startingPage "104" @default.
• W2602496171 abstract "Public surveys or interviews are a straightforward and direct method for gathering data on public perceptions or other locally relevant information. However, compared with Internet, phone, and mail surveys (Dillman, Smyth, and Christian 2014), literature on public survey or interview methods is sparse. While authors of methods textbooks highlight the value of face-to-face interviews for high response rates and usefulness when long, interactive, in-depth interviews are necessary (Neuman 2006; Singleton and Straits 2010), they do not mention shorter and more systematic public interview or survey methods. For research efforts without resources for time-consuming and costly data gathering methods, or without an available sampling frame to identify potential participants, public survey and interview methods can be quite helpful. In addition, when the research topic has a place-based or natural resource focus, certain public places provide salient and convenient opportunities for data gathering (Rookey et al. 2012). Face-to-face survey and interview modes allow for asking more open-ended questions and opportunities for clarification as needed. Further, given a fast-paced society where potential participants generally do not like to be distracted by lengthy, time-consuming survey efforts, there is a need to streamline procedures to reduce time and effort by participants (Dillman et al. 2014). Contemporary technologies, including recording devices, portable tablet computers, and project management software applications, make digitally-enabled surveys quite feasible (Robertson and Boggle 2015), and keep face-to-face interview protocols short and simple.In this paper, we describe a public interview and survey method designed to collect perceptions on water in Utah, with attention to obtaining demographic information to assess the representativeness of participants. We describe involvement of undergraduates in all aspects of the project to show how this method can be adapted for inexperienced research teams, while still attending to protocol and research quality. Our project goals involved research, methods development, and training components. As for research, we sought to gather public perceptions of water issues in a local, community setting. Research questions focused on values and vulnerabilities associated with water, familiar water bodies and assessments of the status of these waters, and the role of community in water issues. In this paper, we limit research findings on water perceptions to illustrations of data types that can be obtained using this method. As to methods development, we sought a mechanism through which we could validate the sample of participants by comparison with local demographic statistics as well as a quick and paperless informed consent and data gathering process, including a way for participants to choose whether they would like to be identified and how they would like their data to be shared. We also endeavored to manage data to ultimately share data to the fullest extent possible given human subjects research limitations. Additionally, training was provided to the research team, not only to ensure careful scientific process and collection of quality data, but also to provide a research experience for undergraduates in social science research design, data collection and management, visualization, and analysis.Literature on Public Intercept SurveysPublic surveys are common in consumer research because of lower costs and usefulness in reaching a local population (Blair, Czaja, and Blair 2014). The mall intercept survey used to be a staple of marketing research (Bush and Hair 1985), but was later questioned for sample bias due to changes in shopping populations (Bush and Grant 1995) and avoidance behavior (Keilor and Sutton 1993). Public methods have been used in national parks (Anderson et al. 2010; Ricard, Scherer and Newman 2011; Rookey et al. …" @default.
• W2602496171 created "2017-04-07" @default.
• W2602496171 creator A5012542598 @default.
• W2602496171 creator A5019383135 @default.
• W2602496171 creator A5031359458 @default.
• W2602496171 creator A5032473969 @default.
• W2602496171 creator A5040723722 @default.
• W2602496171 creator A5059372854 @default.
• W2602496171 creator A5071639511 @default.
• W2602496171 creator A5087397905 @default.
• W2602496171 date "2016-09-01" @default.
• W2602496171 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2602496171 title "Public intercept interviews and surveys for gathering place-based perceptions: Observations from community water research in Utah" @default.
• W2602496171 cites W1415140174 @default.
• W2602496171 cites W1580288159 @default.
• W2602496171 cites W1963871207 @default.
• W2602496171 cites W2032539686 @default.
• W2602496171 cites W2157962488 @default.
• W2602496171 cites W2323692791 @default.
• W2602496171 cites W2564865314 @default.
• W2602496171 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2602496171 type Work @default.
• W2602496171 sameAs 2602496171 @default.
• W2602496171 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2602496171 countsByYear W26024961712018 @default.
• W2602496171 countsByYear W26024961712021 @default.
• W2602496171 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2602496171 hasAuthorship W2602496171A5012542598 @default.
• W2602496171 hasAuthorship W2602496171A5019383135 @default.
• W2602496171 hasAuthorship W2602496171A5031359458 @default.
• W2602496171 hasAuthorship W2602496171A5032473969 @default.
• W2602496171 hasAuthorship W2602496171A5040723722 @default.
• W2602496171 hasAuthorship W2602496171A5059372854 @default.
• W2602496171 hasAuthorship W2602496171A5071639511 @default.
• W2602496171 hasAuthorship W2602496171A5087397905 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C133462117 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C198477413 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C206345919 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C2778707766 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConcept C73945780 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C105795698 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C110875604 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C133462117 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C136764020 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C138885662 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C142724271 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C144024400 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C15744967 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C169760540 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C17744445 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C19165224 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C198477413 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C206345919 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C2522767166 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C26760741 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C2778707766 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C31258907 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C33923547 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C36289849 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C39549134 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C41008148 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C41895202 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C509550671 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C56995899 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C71924100 @default.
• W2602496171 hasConceptScore W2602496171C73945780 @default.
• W2602496171 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2602496171 hasLocation W26024961711 @default.
• W2602496171 hasOpenAccess W2602496171 @default.
• W2602496171 hasPrimaryLocation W26024961711 @default.
• W2602496171 hasRelatedWork W1557880892 @default.
• W2602496171 hasRelatedWork W2005728563 @default.
• W2602496171 hasRelatedWork W2029004581 @default.
• W2602496171 hasRelatedWork W2073351851 @default.
• W2602496171 hasRelatedWork W2077242492 @default.
• W2602496171 hasRelatedWork W2091992940 @default.
• W2602496171 hasRelatedWork W2113483527 @default.
• W2602496171 hasRelatedWork W2116306321 @default.

• next