FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2604168090> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2604168090 abstract "INTRODUCTIONThe present contribution comprises, most generally expressed, an interest in the concept of ‘reflexivity' and its potential to radicalize the business school. Departing from the observation that notions of ‘reflexivity' and ‘reflection' in their ubiquitous use have taken on variegated shadings, I will begin this paper by highlighting those interpretations which envision (and thereby prescribe) reflexivity as the kind of practice that seeks to disclose the author's intentions, assumptions, ideologies, etc., so as to make a particular piece of writing, respectively its meaning, more accessible. Illustrating this argument on behalf of qualitative research, I will delineate that this exegesis of reflexivity operates to portray the author as a purposeful persona who exhibits a linear, agentic and hierarchical relationship with the respective text, and who is thus envisaged as being in charge of its meaning. The aim of this paper then is to scrutinize this image of reflexivity by calling into question if such ‘confessional tales' make (qualitative) research more authentic, not to say credible. To this end, I will pinpoint some of the basic root assumptions of this stream of arguing in order then to suggest an alternative meaning of reflexivity, that is, one that takes reading and text, and not the author, as its center of gravity. In so doing, I will first introduce excerpts of Derrida's work on literature as well as Barthes' and Foucault's investigations of the author (function) in order to problematize the idea whereby the intelligibility of a particular utterance or text presupposes laying bare the (ideological) grounding and/or intentional state of its author. Hence, whereas seeking to dissociate the link between text and author as reproduced by proponents of qualitative research, and by accentuating both the significance of the text's context and its reader, I will then get to endorse seeing reflexivity' as a deconstructive practice. In trying to work out the potential tenets of deconstruction for the business school to come, a brief detour will be taken to display the kind of criticism deconstruction has been subjected to. It will be shown, for instance, that Derrida's deconstructive work has elicited suspicion and severe opposition both in- and outside the context of academic philosophy. In discussing some of the best established and most infamous misperceptions of Derrida and his deconstructive work, it will further be discussed that the matter has often been displayed as a purely theoretical or private endeavor which has no stake in public or real-life' issues, or as a condemnable since disinterested, nihilistic intellectual exercise. Given the often ignorant, or at least obscure treatment of deconstruction (Critchley, 1999), I will point out, among other things, that deconstruction and (antagonistic) criticism, read: destruction, embody different objectives (Patton & Protevi, 2003) wherefore the two spheres of textual analysis must be apprehended in terms of their dissimilarity. With this in mind, I will revitalize' deconstruction as an affirmative gesture that acknowledges and respects the work being subjected to analysis. Furthermore, I will depict some of the ethical aspirations' (Jones, 2003) and yet neglected (political) potentials of deconstruction (Patton, 2003) in order to construe the subject matter as a radical means for deschooling' (Illich, 1973) the contemporary business school (from within). Proclaiming that the age of deconstruction' has already dawned in the humanities (Nealon, 2003) but only marginally influenced the realm of business schools, this treatise will then climax in the formulation of the business school without conditions in which deconstruction gets to tower as the epitome of free expression and responsible reflection. By the same token, claiming a space for deconstruction in the business school of the future, I will get to elaborate on the (possible) position and function of deconstruction in educational curricula and on its respective relationship with and merit for prevailing, that is, mainstream theory." @default.
• W2604168090 created "2017-04-14" @default.
• W2604168090 creator A5087289189 @default.
• W2604168090 date "2005-09-17" @default.
• W2604168090 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2604168090 title "Deconstructive Reflexivity in the Business School without Conditions" @default.
• W2604168090 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2604168090 type Work @default.
• W2604168090 sameAs 2604168090 @default.
• W2604168090 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2604168090 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2604168090 hasAuthorship W2604168090A5087289189 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConcept C13200473 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConcept C2778738376 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConceptScore W2604168090C111472728 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConceptScore W2604168090C13200473 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConceptScore W2604168090C138885662 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConceptScore W2604168090C144024400 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConceptScore W2604168090C158071213 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConceptScore W2604168090C17744445 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConceptScore W2604168090C199539241 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConceptScore W2604168090C2778738376 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConceptScore W2604168090C2780876879 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConceptScore W2604168090C36289849 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConceptScore W2604168090C41895202 @default.
• W2604168090 hasConceptScore W2604168090C94625758 @default.
• W2604168090 hasLocation W26041680901 @default.
• W2604168090 hasOpenAccess W2604168090 @default.
• W2604168090 hasPrimaryLocation W26041680901 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W1520068536 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W1534053647 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W1776304651 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W1991297196 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W1996491133 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W2086409495 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W2087678737 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W2106744465 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W2326265602 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W2476487298 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W2480641264 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W2489134924 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W2511551733 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W2771711507 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W2796388543 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W2980166473 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W317528296 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W433602289 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W592519116 @default.
• W2604168090 hasRelatedWork W2327469800 @default.
• W2604168090 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2604168090 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2604168090 magId "2604168090" @default.
• W2604168090 workType "article" @default.