FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2604279913> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2604279913 abstract "You have accessJournal of UrologyStone Disease: Surgical Therapy V1 Apr 2017MP50-20 DOES PREOPERATIVE ALPHA BLOCKERS FACILITATES URETEROSCOPE INSERTION AT VESICO URETERIC JUNCTION? AN ANSWER FROM A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY. Ashok Sokhal, Satyanarayan Sankhwar, Apul Goel, and kawaljit Singh Ashok SokhalAshok Sokhal More articles by this author , Satyanarayan SankhwarSatyanarayan Sankhwar More articles by this author , Apul GoelApul Goel More articles by this author , and kawaljit Singhkawaljit Singh More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.1608AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate whether alpha blockers facilitate the negotiation of the ureteroscope through the ureteric orifice, if administered preoperatively, based on the role of alpha blockers mainly tamsulosin in MET of ureteric calculus. METHODS A prospective, randomized study of 174 patients who underwent ureteroscopic stone removal for lower or mid ureteric calculi between November 2014 and March 2016. We included patients above the age of 14 years who were planned for ureteroscopic stone removal. We divided the patients into two groups, as those who were not prescribed alpha blockers prior to surgery (Group A – No alpha blocker; NAB) and group B including those patients who were started on alpha blockers tamsulosin 0.4 mg 3 days prior to surgery (Group-B - Alpha blocker; AB). We excluded patients with stone size > 1 cm, spontaneous stone passage prior to surgery, unable to perform URS and previous history of ureteroscopic intervention. RESULTS Our study included 124 patients, among them 60 patients were prescribed alpha blockers preoperatively (group B). Mean age of the study population was 37.62 + 9.74 (15-64 years). Mean stone burden was 38.92 + 8.21 (15.94 - 58.12 mm2). The difference in rate of ureteroscope negotiation through ureteric orifice between NAB and AB group was not statistically significant (p=0.57). CONCLUSIONS In URS, preoperative administration of alpha blockers failed to demonstrate the benefits of technical ease and lower complication rate. Further large group, multi-centric studies required to reach up a definitive role of alpha blockers prior to URS. © 2017FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 197Issue 4SApril 2017Page: e691-e692 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017MetricsAuthor Information Ashok Sokhal More articles by this author Satyanarayan Sankhwar More articles by this author Apul Goel More articles by this author kawaljit Singh More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2604279913 created "2017-04-14" @default.
• W2604279913 creator A5002274249 @default.
• W2604279913 creator A5045391078 @default.
• W2604279913 creator A5063308433 @default.
• W2604279913 creator A5081009905 @default.
• W2604279913 date "2017-04-01" @default.
• W2604279913 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2604279913 title "MP50-20 DOES PREOPERATIVE ALPHA BLOCKERS FACILITATES URETEROSCOPE INSERTION AT VESICO URETERIC JUNCTION? AN ANSWER FROM A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY." @default.
• W2604279913 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.1608" @default.
• W2604279913 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2604279913 type Work @default.
• W2604279913 sameAs 2604279913 @default.
• W2604279913 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2604279913 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2604279913 hasAuthorship W2604279913A5002274249 @default.
• W2604279913 hasAuthorship W2604279913A5045391078 @default.
• W2604279913 hasAuthorship W2604279913A5063308433 @default.
• W2604279913 hasAuthorship W2604279913A5081009905 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConcept C2776664737 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConcept C2777562237 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConcept C2780542891 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConcept C2780653459 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConceptScore W2604279913C126322002 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConceptScore W2604279913C126894567 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConceptScore W2604279913C141071460 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConceptScore W2604279913C168563851 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConceptScore W2604279913C188816634 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConceptScore W2604279913C2776664737 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConceptScore W2604279913C2777562237 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConceptScore W2604279913C2780542891 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConceptScore W2604279913C2780653459 @default.
• W2604279913 hasConceptScore W2604279913C71924100 @default.
• W2604279913 hasIssue "4S" @default.
• W2604279913 hasLocation W26042799131 @default.
• W2604279913 hasOpenAccess W2604279913 @default.
• W2604279913 hasPrimaryLocation W26042799131 @default.
• W2604279913 hasRelatedWork W1994973173 @default.
• W2604279913 hasRelatedWork W2008349529 @default.
• W2604279913 hasRelatedWork W2552080548 @default.
• W2604279913 hasRelatedWork W2556179521 @default.
• W2604279913 hasRelatedWork W2588956519 @default.
• W2604279913 hasRelatedWork W2589886230 @default.
• W2604279913 hasRelatedWork W2935769963 @default.
• W2604279913 hasRelatedWork W3022072060 @default.
• W2604279913 hasRelatedWork W4235529981 @default.
• W2604279913 hasRelatedWork W4245709779 @default.
• W2604279913 hasVolume "197" @default.
• W2604279913 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2604279913 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2604279913 magId "2604279913" @default.
• W2604279913 workType "article" @default.