FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2605024669> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2605024669 endingPage "49" @default.
• W2605024669 startingPage "44" @default.
• W2605024669 abstract "Objective To evaluate unplanned medical visits within the early postoperative period after ureteroscopy in patients with and without ureteral stent placement. Materials and Methods We identified all ureteroscopic procedures for urinary stone disease in the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database from 2010 to 2012. The primary outcome was any emergency department visit or inpatient hospital admission in the first 7 days following ureteroscopy. Patients were subcategorized by type of ureteroscopy (ie, laser lithotripsy vs basket retrieval) and were analyzed for significant differences between stented and unstented patients. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine if ureteral stent placement was independently associated with unplanned visits. Results Our analytic cohort included 16,060 patients undergoing 17,716 ureteroscopy procedures. A ureteral stent was placed in 86.2% of patients undergoing laser lithotripsy and in 70.5% of patients receiving basket retrieval. In the 7 days following ureteroscopy, 6.6% of patients were seen in the emergency department and 2.2% of patients were admitted to a hospital. In a fully adjusted model, the utilization of a ureteral stent was not associated with emergency department visits or inpatient admissions. Conclusion Ureteral stent placement during ureteroscopy is not associated with an increased odds of emergency department visits and inpatient admissions in the early postoperative period. To evaluate unplanned medical visits within the early postoperative period after ureteroscopy in patients with and without ureteral stent placement. We identified all ureteroscopic procedures for urinary stone disease in the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database from 2010 to 2012. The primary outcome was any emergency department visit or inpatient hospital admission in the first 7 days following ureteroscopy. Patients were subcategorized by type of ureteroscopy (ie, laser lithotripsy vs basket retrieval) and were analyzed for significant differences between stented and unstented patients. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine if ureteral stent placement was independently associated with unplanned visits. Our analytic cohort included 16,060 patients undergoing 17,716 ureteroscopy procedures. A ureteral stent was placed in 86.2% of patients undergoing laser lithotripsy and in 70.5% of patients receiving basket retrieval. In the 7 days following ureteroscopy, 6.6% of patients were seen in the emergency department and 2.2% of patients were admitted to a hospital. In a fully adjusted model, the utilization of a ureteral stent was not associated with emergency department visits or inpatient admissions. Ureteral stent placement during ureteroscopy is not associated with an increased odds of emergency department visits and inpatient admissions in the early postoperative period." @default.
• W2605024669 created "2017-04-14" @default.
• W2605024669 creator A5020136401 @default.
• W2605024669 creator A5031885487 @default.
• W2605024669 creator A5033318191 @default.
• W2605024669 creator A5034939991 @default.
• W2605024669 creator A5038030024 @default.
• W2605024669 creator A5046970092 @default.
• W2605024669 creator A5053777150 @default.
• W2605024669 date "2018-07-01" @default.
• W2605024669 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2605024669 title "Unplanned Emergency Department Visits and Hospital Admissions Following Ureteroscopy: Do Ureteral Stents Make a Difference?" @default.
• W2605024669 cites W1540801685 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W1691996340 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W1879634492 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W2007111297 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W2033469543 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W2051201536 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W2059674799 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W2061947545 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W2088585114 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W2094893257 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W2098326629 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W2111995324 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W2113410363 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W2132054978 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W2171942415 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W2175935359 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W2203522806 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W2598766272 @default.
• W2605024669 cites W2748010371 @default.
• W2605024669 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.019" @default.
• W2605024669 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29601836" @default.
• W2605024669 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2605024669 type Work @default.
• W2605024669 sameAs 2605024669 @default.
• W2605024669 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W2605024669 countsByYear W26050246692018 @default.
• W2605024669 countsByYear W26050246692019 @default.
• W2605024669 countsByYear W26050246692020 @default.
• W2605024669 countsByYear W26050246692021 @default.
• W2605024669 countsByYear W26050246692022 @default.
• W2605024669 countsByYear W26050246692023 @default.
• W2605024669 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2605024669 hasAuthorship W2605024669A5020136401 @default.
• W2605024669 hasAuthorship W2605024669A5031885487 @default.
• W2605024669 hasAuthorship W2605024669A5033318191 @default.
• W2605024669 hasAuthorship W2605024669A5034939991 @default.
• W2605024669 hasAuthorship W2605024669A5038030024 @default.
• W2605024669 hasAuthorship W2605024669A5046970092 @default.
• W2605024669 hasAuthorship W2605024669A5053777150 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConcept C2776664737 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConcept C2777950166 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConcept C2780653459 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConcept C2780724011 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConcept C2781117068 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConceptScore W2605024669C126322002 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConceptScore W2605024669C141071460 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConceptScore W2605024669C156957248 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConceptScore W2605024669C159110408 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConceptScore W2605024669C167135981 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConceptScore W2605024669C2776664737 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConceptScore W2605024669C2777950166 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConceptScore W2605024669C2778583881 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConceptScore W2605024669C2780653459 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConceptScore W2605024669C2780724011 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConceptScore W2605024669C2781117068 @default.
• W2605024669 hasConceptScore W2605024669C71924100 @default.
• W2605024669 hasLocation W26050246691 @default.
• W2605024669 hasLocation W26050246692 @default.
• W2605024669 hasOpenAccess W2605024669 @default.
• W2605024669 hasPrimaryLocation W26050246691 @default.
• W2605024669 hasRelatedWork W2011373219 @default.
• W2605024669 hasRelatedWork W2065467092 @default.
• W2605024669 hasRelatedWork W2065696596 @default.
• W2605024669 hasRelatedWork W2182523520 @default.
• W2605024669 hasRelatedWork W2392047368 @default.
• W2605024669 hasRelatedWork W2417763411 @default.
• W2605024669 hasRelatedWork W2420876029 @default.
• W2605024669 hasRelatedWork W2766631057 @default.
• W2605024669 hasRelatedWork W3010936685 @default.
• W2605024669 hasRelatedWork W3101382612 @default.
• W2605024669 hasVolume "117" @default.
• W2605024669 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2605024669 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2605024669 magId "2605024669" @default.
• W2605024669 workType "article" @default.