FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2605223564> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2605223564 endingPage "200" @default.
• W2605223564 startingPage "190" @default.
• W2605223564 abstract "Abstract Background In clinical practice, counsellors and psychotherapists rely heavily on their emotional and embodied responses as part of their data gathering. What happens with this epistemological positioning when we generate knowledge in therapy research? Aim: As therapists– researchers, we are intrigued by what Bondi (2012, Qualitative Inquiry, 19 , 9) refers to as a gap between therapeutic practice and research. There are many angles to this ‘gap’, but we have focused on the how to conceptualise and act on our embodied responses during our data analysis phase, with an interest in the emotional entanglement between researchers and the researched. Materials & Methods There is relatively little written about therapists’ relational, emotional or embodied response during the data analysis stage. Using some experiences from a recent mixed‐method study into the impact of training on multilingual therapists, we will revisit our research process within an autoethnographic hybrid (Stanley 2013) approach, influenced by introspective and intersubjective reflexivity (Finlay and Gough, 2003, Reflexivity: A practical guide . London: Blackwell) with personal experience as a route through which to produce academic knowledge. Results The study involved emotional entanglement on different levels; linguistically, personally and as an underpinning grappling with worldviews in light of the researchers’ different epistemic origins. Concluding Discussion Being in a no‐mans‐land between old and new understandings triggered a sense of loss of theory and challenged temporarily our sense of selves. Bion (1961, Learning from experience . London: Karnac) and Gendlin (1997, A process model . New York: Focusing Institute) are examples of ‘frameworks’ which helped to welcome the feeling of lost‐ness, rather than feeling threatened and overwhelmed. The process reminds of the epistemic positioning we learn to adopt in our therapeutic practice. Gendlin (1997) refers to this kind ‘staying with’ the ‘body‐feel’ as means of generating new understandings. The purpose of this article has not been to offer a step by‐step approach to data analysis, but rather to join Stanley's (2013, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 44 , 143) ‘call for accounts’ about what it feels like to do research. Some stages involved excitement, growth, harmony and enrichment, other felt surprisingly unsettling as our own prior understanding expanded. This article only scrapes the surface but might stimulate further discussions around the researcher's use of self at different stages of the process. Therapists are increasingly encouraged to develop research informed practice; this article suggests that our attention also turns to practice informed research, to create platforms for discussions around emotional entanglement with greater epistemic congruence between relational, emotionally attuned practice for both therapists and researcher." @default.
• W2605223564 created "2017-04-14" @default.
• W2605223564 creator A5033491167 @default.
• W2605223564 creator A5061866227 @default.
• W2605223564 date "2017-04-06" @default.
• W2605223564 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W2605223564 title "Embodied situatedness and emotional entanglement in research - An autoethnographic hybrid inquiry into the experience of doing data analysis" @default.
• W2605223564 cites W1490996466 @default.
• W2605223564 cites W1965562838 @default.
• W2605223564 cites W1970794478 @default.
• W2605223564 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W2605223564 cites W2053986011 @default.
• W2605223564 cites W2113474736 @default.
• W2605223564 cites W2159190824 @default.
• W2605223564 cites W2312522984 @default.
• W2605223564 cites W2342513506 @default.
• W2605223564 cites W2503234244 @default.
• W2605223564 cites W2728944273 @default.
• W2605223564 cites W299482838 @default.
• W2605223564 cites W3146083582 @default.
• W2605223564 cites W4251002741 @default.
• W2605223564 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12122" @default.
• W2605223564 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2605223564 type Work @default.
• W2605223564 sameAs 2605223564 @default.
• W2605223564 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2605223564 countsByYear W26052235642017 @default.
• W2605223564 countsByYear W26052235642018 @default.
• W2605223564 countsByYear W26052235642020 @default.
• W2605223564 countsByYear W26052235642021 @default.
• W2605223564 countsByYear W26052235642022 @default.
• W2605223564 countsByYear W26052235642023 @default.
• W2605223564 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2605223564 hasAuthorship W2605223564A5033491167 @default.
• W2605223564 hasAuthorship W2605223564A5061866227 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConcept C100609095 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConcept C129671850 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConcept C13200473 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConcept C2776225092 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConceptScore W2605223564C100609095 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConceptScore W2605223564C111472728 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConceptScore W2605223564C111919701 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConceptScore W2605223564C129671850 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConceptScore W2605223564C13200473 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConceptScore W2605223564C138885662 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConceptScore W2605223564C144024400 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConceptScore W2605223564C15744967 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConceptScore W2605223564C180747234 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConceptScore W2605223564C190248442 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConceptScore W2605223564C199033989 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConceptScore W2605223564C2776225092 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConceptScore W2605223564C36289849 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConceptScore W2605223564C41008148 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConceptScore W2605223564C41895202 @default.
• W2605223564 hasConceptScore W2605223564C98045186 @default.
• W2605223564 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2605223564 hasLocation W26052235641 @default.
• W2605223564 hasOpenAccess W2605223564 @default.
• W2605223564 hasPrimaryLocation W26052235641 @default.
• W2605223564 hasRelatedWork W197606899 @default.
• W2605223564 hasRelatedWork W2129172777 @default.
• W2605223564 hasRelatedWork W2184029765 @default.
• W2605223564 hasRelatedWork W2608886080 @default.
• W2605223564 hasRelatedWork W2731990254 @default.
• W2605223564 hasRelatedWork W2790092585 @default.
• W2605223564 hasRelatedWork W2883334074 @default.
• W2605223564 hasRelatedWork W3136158623 @default.
• W2605223564 hasRelatedWork W3201885920 @default.
• W2605223564 hasRelatedWork W830607958 @default.
• W2605223564 hasVolume "17" @default.
• W2605223564 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2605223564 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2605223564 magId "2605223564" @default.
• W2605223564 workType "article" @default.