FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2605598155> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2605598155 abstract "Audiologists are health care professionals responsible for the non-medical management of hearing and hearing disorders. A review of population and health statistics in Australia indicates that increasingly more audiologists are needed to service its growing and ageing population.The task of training audiologists falls to the universities that offer audiology programs. One of the biggest limiters on this training is the diminishing numbers of clinical placement opportunities available to the audiology students as a result of clinics external to the universities withdrawing their support of student training (due mostly to commercial pressures). As a result, many university audiology programs have begun to investigate simulation as a method of preparing students for clinical placements, and in particular, simulated patients (SPs). While SPs have been used widely in medicine and allied health professional education, only two studies have been conducted on their use in audiology. While both studies showed audiology students enjoyed working with SPs, neither showed if this work results in measurable gains in student skills. To investigate the potential of using SPs to train basic audiology skills in audiology students, the present research aimed to: (1) develop a tool for assessing the clinical skills of students working with SPs; and (2) compare the effectiveness of SP training versus seminar training for improving the clinical skills of first year audiology students. To develop a tool for assessing audiology students taking a case history from and giving feedback to a simulated patient (SP), a tool from the cognate discipline of speech pathology was modified for use on audiology students. The modified tool, the Audiology Simulated Patient Interview Rating Scale (ASPIRS), was then used by three evaluators to assess 24 first-year masters of audiology students taking case histories from and providing feedback to SPs. Analysis of the tool’s results showed it to have very high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha values from 0.91 to 0.97) and mean inter-item correlations (0.64 to 0.85) within evaluators, lower exact (29.2% to 54.2) but higher near (79.2% to 100%) agreement percentages between pairs of evaluators, and fair to moderate absolute agreement amongst evaluators for single evaluator scores (ICC values from 0.35 to 0.59) to substantial consistency agreement amongst evaluators for three evaluator averaged scores (ICC values from 0.62 to 0.81). Factor analysis showed the 12 items of the ASPIRS fell into two components, a more dominant component addressing feedback and a less dominant component addressing case history. These results indicated the ASPIRS has promise as a tool for assessing the clinical skills of audiology students as they take a case history from and provide feedback to a standardized patient (SP). To compare seminar training versus SP training as methods for training audiology students to take case histories from and give feedback to adult patients, a randomised controlled trial with cross-over design was used to put 24 first-year audiology students through SP then seminar training (n=12) or seminar then SP training (n=12). The SP training involved one student per SP in a clinic setting with individualized feedback. The seminar training involved one academic staff member for the student group in a seminar setting with group feedback. The students were assessed taking a case history and giving feedback to an SP before the first training block, between the two training blocks, and after the final training block. A mixed model analyses of derived factors for case history and feedback showed significant (p<0.05) effects for assessment occasion (i.e., student skills improved with more training) but not for training sequence (i.e., order of training did not affect skill improvements) or training type (i.e., type of training did not affect skill improvements). Results indicated that while student skills improved with SP training there no significant benefit over seminar training in audiology students learning to take case histories from and give feedback to adult patients. Overall, the two studies in this thesis showed two main findings: 1) the ASPIRS has potential for use in the assessment of audiology students interacting with SPs, and 2) SP training provided no significant benefit over seminar training in audiology students learning to take case histories from and give feedback to adult patients. These results suggest basic simulations (in this case lower fidelity seminars rather than higher fidelity SPs) are adequate for teaching basic audiological skills (in this case taking a case history from and giving feedback to a co-operative adult client in a basic, diagnostic audiology setting) to first-year audiology students. The use of more advanced and more expensive simulations (in this case the higher fidelity SPs) in such settings may not be justified. Further investigations into the use of SPs to train audiology students should better consider how the use of SPs fits within the greater context of deliberate instructional design and how SP training might promote transfer of learning to the clinical setting." @default.
• W2605598155 created "2017-04-28" @default.
• W2605598155 creator A5006180204 @default.
• W2605598155 date "2016-12-01" @default.
• W2605598155 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2605598155 title "An investigation of the use of simulated patients in audiology student education" @default.
• W2605598155 cites W1542501957 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W1687253533 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W1825570727 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W1950139256 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W1965787771 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W1966085420 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W1966257030 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W1979262382 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W1980328871 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W1982261495 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W1983058807 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W1983531998 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W1984949452 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W1997504288 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2000191857 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2000888132 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2008844133 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2013413244 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2013720069 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2014363162 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2014385074 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2017461476 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2019398887 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2020138070 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2024573542 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2026910580 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2031000493 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2036812707 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2038514664 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2040964547 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2046931167 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2048687279 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2053013149 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2055751054 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2060711405 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2061051906 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2069505183 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2070277966 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2078107908 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2086237644 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2096676138 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2107890773 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2114055009 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2120145906 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2127205218 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2132909482 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2161515754 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2161709367 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2162661914 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2163562470 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2164169898 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2164777277 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2165427261 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2166943138 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2310337853 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2316010949 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2326274594 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2400204681 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W2477886952 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W3115616283 @default.
• W2605598155 cites W775993692 @default.
• W2605598155 doi "https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2016.1071" @default.
• W2605598155 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2605598155 type Work @default.
• W2605598155 sameAs 2605598155 @default.
• W2605598155 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2605598155 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W2605598155 hasAuthorship W2605598155A5006180204 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConceptScore W2605598155C15744967 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConceptScore W2605598155C160735492 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConceptScore W2605598155C162324750 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConceptScore W2605598155C2908647359 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConceptScore W2605598155C50522688 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConceptScore W2605598155C509550671 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConceptScore W2605598155C548259974 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConceptScore W2605598155C71924100 @default.
• W2605598155 hasConceptScore W2605598155C99454951 @default.
• W2605598155 hasLocation W26055981551 @default.
• W2605598155 hasOpenAccess W2605598155 @default.
• W2605598155 hasPrimaryLocation W26055981551 @default.
• W2605598155 hasRelatedWork W1489783725 @default.
• W2605598155 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
• W2605598155 hasRelatedWork W2039318446 @default.
• W2605598155 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W2605598155 hasRelatedWork W2373994074 @default.

• next