FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2606031170> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2606031170 endingPage "91" @default.
• W2606031170 startingPage "81" @default.
• W2606031170 abstract "OBJECTIVE The ability to assess the risk of adverse events based on known patient factors and comorbidities would provide more effective preoperative risk stratification. Present risk assessment in spine surgery is limited. An adverse event prediction tool was developed to predict the risk of complications after spine surgery and tested on a prospective patient cohort. METHODS The spinal Risk Assessment Tool (RAT), a novel instrument for the assessment of risk for patients undergoing spine surgery that was developed based on an administrative claims database, was prospectively applied to 246 patients undergoing 257 spinal procedures over a 3-month period. Prospectively collected data were used to compare the RAT to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Surgical Risk Calculator. Study end point was occurrence and type of complication after spine surgery. RESULTS The authors identified 69 patients (73 procedures) who experienced a complication over the prospective study period. Cardiac complications were most common (10.2%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to compare complication outcomes using the different assessment tools. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis showed comparable predictive accuracy between the RAT and the ACS NSQIP calculator (0.670 [95% CI 0.60–0.74] in RAT, 0.669 [95% CI 0.60–0.74] in NSQIP). The CCI was not accurate in predicting complication occurrence (0.55 [95% CI 0.48–0.62]). The RAT produced mean probabilities of 34.6% for patients who had a complication and 24% for patients who did not (p = 0.0003). The generated predicted values were stratified into low, medium, and high rates. For the RAT, the predicted complication rate was 10.1% in the low-risk group (observed rate 12.8%), 21.9% in the medium-risk group (observed 31.8%), and 49.7% in the high-risk group (observed 41.2%). The ACS NSQIP calculator consistently produced complication predictions that underestimated complication occurrence: 3.4% in the low-risk group (observed 12.6%), 5.9% in the medium-risk group (observed 34.5%), and 12.5% in the high-risk group (observed 38.8%). The RAT was more accurate than the ACS NSQIP calculator (p = 0.0018). CONCLUSIONS While the RAT and ACS NSQIP calculator were both able to identify patients more likely to experience complications following spine surgery, both have substantial room for improvement. Risk stratification is feasible in spine surgery procedures; currently used measures have low accuracy." @default.
• W2606031170 created "2017-04-28" @default.
• W2606031170 creator A5003056314 @default.
• W2606031170 creator A5010891067 @default.
• W2606031170 creator A5016639693 @default.
• W2606031170 creator A5021433932 @default.
• W2606031170 creator A5029137381 @default.
• W2606031170 creator A5033202151 @default.
• W2606031170 creator A5061003412 @default.
• W2606031170 creator A5062167398 @default.
• W2606031170 creator A5066803257 @default.
• W2606031170 creator A5068820196 @default.
• W2606031170 creator A5068887083 @default.
• W2606031170 creator A5069142995 @default.
• W2606031170 creator A5077763565 @default.
• W2606031170 creator A5086162050 @default.
• W2606031170 creator A5091509681 @default.
• W2606031170 date "2017-07-01" @default.
• W2606031170 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2606031170 title "Predicting complication risk in spine surgery: a prospective analysis of a novel risk assessment tool" @default.
• W2606031170 cites W1480471807 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W1970097492 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W1974696817 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W1984963895 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W1992417617 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W1994497306 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2000445173 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2003843629 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2005054719 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2012101287 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2014209752 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2016114707 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2022016339 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2027951835 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2031583479 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2037612535 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2039225394 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2039325790 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2048301249 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2059284624 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2060910232 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2061414577 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2065966788 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2068764048 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W207335601 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2077866098 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2085415259 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2093582145 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2106755981 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2117195641 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2132508160 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2139599336 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2154692607 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2157244868 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2168592882 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2229618181 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2271110102 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2317290154 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2328176404 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2334214027 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W2395549741 @default.
• W2606031170 cites W4295681930 @default.
• W2606031170 doi "https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.12.spine16969" @default.
• W2606031170 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28430052" @default.
• W2606031170 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2606031170 type Work @default.
• W2606031170 sameAs 2606031170 @default.
• W2606031170 citedByCount "75" @default.
• W2606031170 countsByYear W26060311702017 @default.
• W2606031170 countsByYear W26060311702018 @default.
• W2606031170 countsByYear W26060311702019 @default.
• W2606031170 countsByYear W26060311702020 @default.
• W2606031170 countsByYear W26060311702021 @default.
• W2606031170 countsByYear W26060311702022 @default.
• W2606031170 countsByYear W26060311702023 @default.
• W2606031170 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2606031170 hasAuthorship W2606031170A5003056314 @default.
• W2606031170 hasAuthorship W2606031170A5010891067 @default.
• W2606031170 hasAuthorship W2606031170A5016639693 @default.
• W2606031170 hasAuthorship W2606031170A5021433932 @default.
• W2606031170 hasAuthorship W2606031170A5029137381 @default.
• W2606031170 hasAuthorship W2606031170A5033202151 @default.
• W2606031170 hasAuthorship W2606031170A5061003412 @default.
• W2606031170 hasAuthorship W2606031170A5062167398 @default.
• W2606031170 hasAuthorship W2606031170A5066803257 @default.
• W2606031170 hasAuthorship W2606031170A5068820196 @default.
• W2606031170 hasAuthorship W2606031170A5068887083 @default.
• W2606031170 hasAuthorship W2606031170A5069142995 @default.
• W2606031170 hasAuthorship W2606031170A5077763565 @default.
• W2606031170 hasAuthorship W2606031170A5086162050 @default.
• W2606031170 hasAuthorship W2606031170A5091509681 @default.
• W2606031170 hasBestOaLocation W26060311701 @default.
• W2606031170 hasConcept C12174686 @default.
• W2606031170 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2606031170 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2606031170 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2606031170 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2606031170 hasConcept C197934379 @default.

• next