Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2606602009> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 52 of
52
with 100 items per page.
- W2606602009 endingPage "92" @default.
- W2606602009 startingPage "82" @default.
- W2606602009 abstract "One very natural dividing line that—for better or worse—is often used to distinguish those who (put roughly for now) believe in God from those who do not is that between theism and atheism, where ‘theism’ is used to mark the believers and ‘atheism’ the non-believers. Such contrastive labels can serve many practical functions (e.g., signifying social identity) even when the terms in question are not clearly defined. Individuals are often, on the basis of their beliefs and values, attracted (sometimes rationally, sometimes irrationally) toward one such label more so than the other. However, once a clear statement of the substantive difference between theism and atheism is requested, things become more complicated, much more so than our casual use of these terms would suggest. What exactly is the best way to capture the relationship between theism and atheism? To what extent are they opposed to one another, and relatedly, to what extent should they be regarded as exhausting the available theoretical options? §2 will canvass a range of responses to this cluster of questions. In §3, we explore the social-epistemic dimension of the atheism/theism divide, by focusing in particular on the issue of religious disagreements, including those disagreements that take very different assumptions as starting points." @default.
- W2606602009 created "2017-04-28" @default.
- W2606602009 creator A5044269608 @default.
- W2606602009 date "2017-07-20" @default.
- W2606602009 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2606602009 title "Are theism and atheism totally opposed? Can they learn from each other?" @default.
- W2606602009 doi "https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315102474-9" @default.
- W2606602009 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2606602009 type Work @default.
- W2606602009 sameAs 2606602009 @default.
- W2606602009 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2606602009 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
- W2606602009 hasAuthorship W2606602009A5044269608 @default.
- W2606602009 hasBestOaLocation W26066020092 @default.
- W2606602009 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2606602009 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2606602009 hasConcept C200610012 @default.
- W2606602009 hasConcept C2779783995 @default.
- W2606602009 hasConceptScore W2606602009C111472728 @default.
- W2606602009 hasConceptScore W2606602009C138885662 @default.
- W2606602009 hasConceptScore W2606602009C200610012 @default.
- W2606602009 hasConceptScore W2606602009C2779783995 @default.
- W2606602009 hasLocation W26066020091 @default.
- W2606602009 hasLocation W26066020092 @default.
- W2606602009 hasOpenAccess W2606602009 @default.
- W2606602009 hasPrimaryLocation W26066020091 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W193276449 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W1966539327 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W2002005636 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W2011223984 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W2062316283 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W2078741094 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W2113296894 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W2116495705 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W2191336486 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W2229757206 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W2317718019 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W2319783059 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W236751250 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W2462379291 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W2462772495 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W2482242821 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W258720522 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W2773847433 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W2921133537 @default.
- W2606602009 hasRelatedWork W644489444 @default.
- W2606602009 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2606602009 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2606602009 magId "2606602009" @default.
- W2606602009 workType "book-chapter" @default.