Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2606619609> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2606619609 endingPage "e1002273" @default.
- W2606619609 startingPage "e1002273" @default.
- W2606619609 abstract "Background This study aimed to evaluate whether prompting general practitioners (GPs) to routinely assess and manage anxiety and depression in patients consulting with osteoarthritis (OA) improves pain outcomes. Methods and findings We conducted a cluster randomised controlled trial involving 45 English general practices. In intervention practices, patients aged ≥45 y consulting with OA received point-of-care anxiety and depression screening by the GP, prompted by an automated electronic template comprising five questions (a two-item Patient Health Questionnaire–2 for depression, a two-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder–2 questionnaire for anxiety, and a question about current pain intensity [0–10 numerical rating scale]). The template signposted GPs to follow National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guidelines for anxiety, depression, and OA and was supported by a brief training package. The template in control practices prompted GPs to ask the pain intensity question only. The primary outcome was patient-reported current pain intensity post-consultation and at 3-, 6-, and 12-mo follow-up. Secondary outcomes included pain-related disability, anxiety, depression, and general health. During the trial period, 7,279 patients aged ≥45 y consulted with a relevant OA-related code, and 4,240 patients were deemed potentially eligible by participating GPs. Templates were completed for 2,042 patients (1,339 [31.6%] in the control arm and 703 [23.1%] in the intervention arm). Of these 2,042 patients, 1,412 returned questionnaires (501 [71.3%] from 20 intervention practices, 911 [68.0%] from 24 control practices). Follow-up rates were similar in both arms, totalling 1,093 (77.4%) at 3 mo, 1,064 (75.4%) at 6 mo, and 1,017 (72.0%) at 12 mo. For the primary endpoint, multilevel modelling yielded significantly higher average pain intensity across follow-up to 12 mo in the intervention group than the control group (adjusted mean difference 0.31; 95% CI 0.04, 0.59). Secondary outcomes were consistent with the primary outcome measure in reflecting better outcomes as a whole for the control group than the intervention group. Anxiety and depression scores did not reduce following the intervention. The main limitations of this study are two potential sources of bias: an imbalance in cluster size (mean practice size 7,397 [intervention] versus 5,850 [control]) and a difference in the proportion of patients for whom the GP deactivated the template (33.6% [intervention] versus 27.8% [control]). Conclusions In this study, we observed no beneficial effect on pain outcomes of prompting GPs to routinely screen for and manage comorbid anxiety and depression in patients presenting with symptoms due to OA, with those in the intervention group reporting statistically significantly higher average pain scores over the four follow-up time points than those in the control group. Trial registration ISRCTN registry ISRCTN40721988" @default.
- W2606619609 created "2017-04-28" @default.
- W2606619609 creator A5012491915 @default.
- W2606619609 creator A5013529931 @default.
- W2606619609 creator A5018353192 @default.
- W2606619609 creator A5021965720 @default.
- W2606619609 creator A5027298393 @default.
- W2606619609 creator A5039635643 @default.
- W2606619609 creator A5043675138 @default.
- W2606619609 creator A5051537242 @default.
- W2606619609 creator A5055654523 @default.
- W2606619609 creator A5057920889 @default.
- W2606619609 creator A5060624562 @default.
- W2606619609 creator A5061543609 @default.
- W2606619609 creator A5071064181 @default.
- W2606619609 creator A5076473124 @default.
- W2606619609 creator A5088964555 @default.
- W2606619609 date "2017-04-11" @default.
- W2606619609 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W2606619609 title "The effects of implementing a point-of-care electronic template to prompt routine anxiety and depression screening in patients consulting for osteoarthritis (the Primary Care Osteoarthritis Trial): A cluster randomised trial in primary care" @default.
- W2606619609 cites W170006779 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W1710630693 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W1791960638 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W1958931973 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W1964777084 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W1966128258 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W1967665781 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W1973067829 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W1974947806 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W1982151240 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W1983314768 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W1986739668 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W1992708231 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W1994576588 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W1995422036 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2005732471 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2012410632 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2013885590 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2020316895 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2023672758 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2028539407 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2029662381 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2030272157 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2037066898 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2041878767 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2041948285 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2043512940 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2043705607 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2045126499 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2046617780 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2046653339 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2047611432 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2055421503 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2063166883 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2069790903 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2072261059 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2077042113 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2078144530 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2080679909 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2084206141 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2085005241 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2085795010 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2090132979 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2099013608 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2100161403 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2102876690 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2108344016 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2111079817 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2112250390 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2113686669 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2115760277 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2126700002 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2130863201 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2132322340 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2136654540 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2136933283 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2139964413 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2140790148 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2143598716 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2145476281 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2147735030 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2148694444 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2153247789 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2157659106 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2160834472 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2160849155 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2163336520 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2169522110 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2172151487 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2253364553 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W2497980412 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W3194956376 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W4240032685 @default.
- W2606619609 cites W4245884070 @default.
- W2606619609 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002273" @default.
- W2606619609 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5388468" @default.
- W2606619609 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28399129" @default.
- W2606619609 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.