FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2606692329> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2606692329 endingPage "248" @default.
• W2606692329 startingPage "213" @default.
• W2606692329 abstract "The paper offers a survey of the relation to the past in the thought and practice of the Latin grammarians. Some preliminary considerations are offered on the exegetical tendency of ancient grammar and on how this is reflected in the diversified selection of the so-called idonei auctores, addressing also the increasing prevalence, in the regulation of linguistic usage, of reference to moderni auctores beside documenting consuetudo vetus. Beginning from the general study of all the attestations in the Corpus grammaticorum of the abstract nouns vetustas and antiquitas (and more analytically of the instances of the connected adverbs antique, vetuste and antiquitus), the study documents their much greater rarity compared to the empirical notices on specific uses attributed to the veteres and/or to the antiqui; there is a clear predominance of a rather limited sense of the two abstract nouns, associated with concepts such as licentia, abusio and confusio. After an excursus on the very different conception of the relation between antiquitas and vetustas in Varro (perhaps inherited from him by the orthographic writers), some passages are re-examined in relation to this point - not without textual proposals and original exegesis. These are passages in which it has been held that we find a reference to vetustas among the qualifying criteria for Latinitas. In Quint. inst. 1.6.1-3 the reference to vetustas, far from being elevated to a criterion of linguistic correctness, should rather be interpreted as a specific reference to the ornamentum eloquentiae. From the analysis of the parallel passages in Charisius p. 61.16-63.16 B. and Diomedes GL I 439.14-30, it becomes clear that the reference in the latter to the veterum lectio does not derive from the nearest common source (Pliny or Caper), but is the result of an insert, moving from a detail of the different doctrine of Latinitas that emerges from definitions going back to Scaurus by Maximus Victorinus (GL VI 189.3 ff.) + Audax (GL VII 322.21 ff.) + Ars Augustini (p. 1 B.) + Excerpta Andecavensia (p. 246.149ff. D.N.). As for this scaurine doctrine, the paper critically edits and evaluates a new and detailed testimony drawn from a hitherto unedited section of the Explanationes in Donatum. This confirms, among other things, the important distinction between the two scopes of the reference to veteres in the grammarians: the first more ‘erudite’ one, effectively limited to high Republican authors, the other more ‘ecumenical’, which extends so far as to embrace also the classics of Augustan poetry. Finally a selection of illustrative passages is presented with commentary, showing the necessary link to consuetudo vetus implicit in the grammarians′ constant attention to various aspects of dubius sermo. The paper ends with the discussion of a passage of Diomedes (GL I 400.1-401.9), which attests that interest in the theme, already recurring in Horace, of Latin’s evolution as language has also contributed not a little to keeping alive in the grammatical tradition the reference to the linguistic freedom of the veteres. Desidero in primo luogo ringraziare gli editori di questo volume per lo spunto a riflettere su un tema centrale non solo per la teoria e la prassi dell’analisi linguistica antica, ma, in sostanza, per la selezione stessa e la conservazione (o la perdita) della letteratura latina. Premetto anche subito che non intendo qui - e non solo per motivi di spazio - esaminare tutto il materiale che sarebbe necessario discutere sotto il titolo, certo troppo ambizioso, che sta in testa al presente contributo. Il mio intento è semplicemente quello di formulare qualche considerazione non arbitraria sul riferimento mai neutro al passato nelle opere dei grammatici latini, accompagnandola alla rilettura di alcuni testi che mi sembrano di qualche rilievo non solo per la comprensione funzionale di tale riferimento, ma anche per l’inquadramento della presenza stessa, presso i grammatici, di documentazione tratta dagli autori più remoti." @default.
• W2606692329 created "2017-04-28" @default.
• W2606692329 creator A5026617146 @default.
• W2606692329 date "2017-07-10" @default.
• W2606692329 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2606692329 title "Vetustas e antiquitas, veteres e antiqui nei grammatici latini" @default.
• W2606692329 doi "https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110521689-013" @default.
• W2606692329 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2606692329 type Work @default.
• W2606692329 sameAs 2606692329 @default.
• W2606692329 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2606692329 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W2606692329 hasAuthorship W2606692329A5026617146 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConcept C121934690 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConcept C25343380 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConcept C26022165 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConcept C2780376419 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConcept C507015567 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConceptScore W2606692329C121934690 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConceptScore W2606692329C124952713 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConceptScore W2606692329C138885662 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConceptScore W2606692329C142362112 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConceptScore W2606692329C166957645 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConceptScore W2606692329C25343380 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConceptScore W2606692329C26022165 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConceptScore W2606692329C2780376419 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConceptScore W2606692329C41008148 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConceptScore W2606692329C41895202 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConceptScore W2606692329C507015567 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConceptScore W2606692329C77088390 @default.
• W2606692329 hasConceptScore W2606692329C95457728 @default.
• W2606692329 hasLocation W26066923291 @default.
• W2606692329 hasOpenAccess W2606692329 @default.
• W2606692329 hasPrimaryLocation W26066923291 @default.
• W2606692329 hasRelatedWork W1489627961 @default.
• W2606692329 hasRelatedWork W1598674258 @default.
• W2606692329 hasRelatedWork W1608275428 @default.
• W2606692329 hasRelatedWork W2271424936 @default.
• W2606692329 hasRelatedWork W2350809378 @default.
• W2606692329 hasRelatedWork W421092554 @default.
• W2606692329 hasRelatedWork W425541985 @default.
• W2606692329 hasRelatedWork W564626972 @default.
• W2606692329 hasRelatedWork W576114624 @default.
• W2606692329 hasRelatedWork W577369383 @default.
• W2606692329 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2606692329 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2606692329 magId "2606692329" @default.
• W2606692329 workType "book-chapter" @default.