FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2607320210> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2607320210 abstract "The purpose of this study is to investigate the process doctoral students go through in qualification exam. Within a grounded theory design, a series of in-depth interviews were carried out with six doctoral candidates to inquire into their thoughts and experiences. Data collection started four months before the qualification exam and ended approximately a month after the exam had been taken. A total of 127 pages of interview transcripts were produced as a result of interviews. The data from these interviews were analysed in three stages: (1) initial coding and theorizing; (2) selective coding and theorizing; (3) theoretical codes. The theoretical codes were generated from the codes using the constant comparative method. The analysis revealed five interrelated phases students go through in the qualification exam: Ambiguity and procrastination; Getting lost and finding ways; Getting on with the unavoidable: taking the exam; Relief or burnout after the exam, and Looking back with mixed feelings. Key words: doctoral qualification exam; doctoral students; higher education; grounded theory.  --- Svrha je ovog istraživanja ispitati proces koji studenti doktorskog studija moraju proći kako bi mogli položiti kvalifikacijski ispit. Primjenom dizajna istraživanja koji se koristi metodom utemeljene teorije, proveden je niz produbljenih intervjua sa šest kandidata za doktorski studij kako bi se ispitala njhova mišljenja i iskustva. Prikupljanje podataka započelo je četiri mjeseca prije kvalifikacijskog ispita i završilo je otprilike mjesec dana prije polaganja ispita. Nakon provedenih intervjua, napisano je otprilike 127 stranica transkribiranog teksta. Podaci dobiveni u intervjuima analizirani su u tri faze: (1) inicijalno kodiranje i teroretiziranje, (2) selektivno kodiranje i teoretiziranje, (3) teorijsko kodiranje. Teorijski kodovi stvoreni su iz kodova primjenom konstantne komparativne metode. Analiza je pokazala pet međusobno povezanih faza kroz koje studenti prolaze tijekom pripreme za kvalifikacijski ispit: Nejasnoće i odgađanje, Gubljenje i pronalaženje, Pomak prema neodgodivom: polaganje ispita, Olakšanje ili sagorijevanje nakon ispita, Pogled unatrag s pomiješanim osjećajima. Ključne riječi: kvalifikacijski doktorski ispit; studenti doktorskog studija; visoko obrazovanje; utemeljena teorija." @default.
• W2607320210 created "2017-04-28" @default.
• W2607320210 creator A5009296310 @default.
• W2607320210 creator A5048482126 @default.
• W2607320210 date "2017-04-10" @default.
• W2607320210 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2607320210 title "Journey into Doctoral Candidacy: A Grounded Theory Study of Doctoral Qualification Exam Process / Putovanje kandidata za doktorski studij: istraživanje postupka polaganja kvalifikacijskog doktorskog ispita metodom utemeljene teorije" @default.
• W2607320210 cites W144030876 @default.
• W2607320210 cites W1972219810 @default.
• W2607320210 cites W2002204687 @default.
• W2607320210 cites W2032456763 @default.
• W2607320210 cites W2042880049 @default.
• W2607320210 cites W2055510038 @default.
• W2607320210 cites W2070252273 @default.
• W2607320210 cites W2168217287 @default.
• W2607320210 doi "https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v19i1.2017" @default.
• W2607320210 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2607320210 type Work @default.
• W2607320210 sameAs 2607320210 @default.
• W2607320210 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2607320210 countsByYear W26073202102020 @default.
• W2607320210 countsByYear W26073202102021 @default.
• W2607320210 countsByYear W26073202102022 @default.
• W2607320210 countsByYear W26073202102023 @default.
• W2607320210 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2607320210 hasAuthorship W2607320210A5009296310 @default.
• W2607320210 hasAuthorship W2607320210A5048482126 @default.
• W2607320210 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2607320210 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2607320210 hasConcept C156325361 @default.
• W2607320210 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2607320210 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2607320210 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W2607320210 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2607320210 hasConceptScore W2607320210C138885662 @default.
• W2607320210 hasConceptScore W2607320210C144024400 @default.
• W2607320210 hasConceptScore W2607320210C156325361 @default.
• W2607320210 hasConceptScore W2607320210C15708023 @default.
• W2607320210 hasConceptScore W2607320210C15744967 @default.
• W2607320210 hasConceptScore W2607320210C190248442 @default.
• W2607320210 hasConceptScore W2607320210C36289849 @default.
• W2607320210 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2607320210 hasLocation W26073202101 @default.
• W2607320210 hasOpenAccess W2607320210 @default.
• W2607320210 hasPrimaryLocation W26073202101 @default.
• W2607320210 hasRelatedWork W1577498516 @default.
• W2607320210 hasRelatedWork W2069710879 @default.
• W2607320210 hasRelatedWork W2109243536 @default.
• W2607320210 hasRelatedWork W2162915384 @default.
• W2607320210 hasRelatedWork W2321183308 @default.
• W2607320210 hasRelatedWork W2416192 @default.
• W2607320210 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2607320210 hasRelatedWork W3136348542 @default.
• W2607320210 hasRelatedWork W4205889783 @default.
• W2607320210 hasRelatedWork W4211005606 @default.
• W2607320210 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W2607320210 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2607320210 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2607320210 magId "2607320210" @default.
• W2607320210 workType "article" @default.