FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2609059122> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2609059122 endingPage "231" @default.
• W2609059122 startingPage "224" @default.
• W2609059122 abstract "BackgroundProsthetic joint infections (PJI) of hip and knee arthroplasties are becoming increasingly common with an aging population and an increasing demand for these procedures. Despite attempts at standardization, medical and surgical approaches vary widely among practitioners. Questions/PurposesWe first sought to determine if there were specific factors associated with choice of one- versus two-stage revision. Then we investigated whether the type of revision approach influenced clinical treatment success. Finally, among two-stage revisions, we assessed if an antibiotic holiday prior to the second procedure affected clinical treatment success. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who had revision surgery for infection of a hip or knee arthroplasty between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2013, at the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and the Holland Orthopedic and Arthritic Centre. PJI cases were identified using the Ontario Joint Replacement Registry. Infection was defined by gross intraoperative evidence of infection, positive intraoperative culture(s), and/or sinus tract prior to operation. The primary outcome was treatment failure at 1 year after revision surgery based on requirement for further surgery, ongoing infection, and/or continuous suppressive antibiotics. ResultsOf 110 eligible patients identified, 35 patients had a one-stage and 75 patients had a two-stage revision. Choice of a one-stage approach was most influenced by particular surgeon preference and was more likely for hip revision versus knee revision (OR 3.39 (95%CI 1.85–6.23). There was no statistical difference in clinical treatment success rate between one-stage (33/35; 94.2% success) and two-stage revision (63/75; 84%; p = 0.13). Enterococcus spp. (21 versus 3%; p = 0.027) and Peptostreptococcus spp. (14 versus 1%; p = 0.042) were more common among clinical treatment failures than successes, with a trend towards the same for Staphylococcus aureus (29 versus 9%; p = 0.06). Additionally, treatment success was not influenced by whether the patient had an antibiotic holiday with a two-stage revision. ConclusionOur findings confirm the uncertainty of surgical strategy for treatment of PJI in hip and knee arthroplasty. Superiority of one- versus two-stage revision and the value of antibiotic-free periods prior to definitive revision remain unclear. Large prospective studies or randomized controlled trials are needed to inform best practice for treatment of these complex clinical problems." @default.
• W2609059122 created "2017-05-05" @default.
• W2609059122 creator A5002630679 @default.
• W2609059122 creator A5016977836 @default.
• W2609059122 creator A5048551155 @default.
• W2609059122 creator A5049544270 @default.
• W2609059122 date "2017-04-26" @default.
• W2609059122 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2609059122 title "Factors Associated with Choice and Success of One- Versus Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Infected Hip and Knee Prostheses" @default.
• W2609059122 cites W1909802012 @default.
• W2609059122 cites W2000220760 @default.
• W2609059122 cites W2006240870 @default.
• W2609059122 cites W2060805865 @default.
• W2609059122 cites W2079575346 @default.
• W2609059122 cites W2109872165 @default.
• W2609059122 cites W2119669110 @default.
• W2609059122 cites W2140100570 @default.
• W2609059122 cites W2142110012 @default.
• W2609059122 cites W2146331746 @default.
• W2609059122 cites W2164101155 @default.
• W2609059122 cites W2257988318 @default.
• W2609059122 cites W2267623173 @default.
• W2609059122 cites W2412401181 @default.
• W2609059122 cites W408340224 @default.
• W2609059122 cites W4247154531 @default.
• W2609059122 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-017-9550-z" @default.
• W2609059122 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5617816" @default.
• W2609059122 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28983214" @default.
• W2609059122 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2609059122 type Work @default.
• W2609059122 sameAs 2609059122 @default.
• W2609059122 citedByCount "25" @default.
• W2609059122 countsByYear W26090591222018 @default.
• W2609059122 countsByYear W26090591222019 @default.
• W2609059122 countsByYear W26090591222020 @default.
• W2609059122 countsByYear W26090591222021 @default.
• W2609059122 countsByYear W26090591222022 @default.
• W2609059122 countsByYear W26090591222023 @default.
• W2609059122 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2609059122 hasAuthorship W2609059122A5002630679 @default.
• W2609059122 hasAuthorship W2609059122A5016977836 @default.
• W2609059122 hasAuthorship W2609059122A5048551155 @default.
• W2609059122 hasAuthorship W2609059122A5049544270 @default.
• W2609059122 hasBestOaLocation W26090591221 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConcept C2778104916 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConcept C43893838 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConceptScore W2609059122C141071460 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConceptScore W2609059122C146357865 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConceptScore W2609059122C151730666 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConceptScore W2609059122C1862650 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConceptScore W2609059122C2778104916 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConceptScore W2609059122C2778336525 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConceptScore W2609059122C2908647359 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConceptScore W2609059122C43893838 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConceptScore W2609059122C61434518 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConceptScore W2609059122C68312169 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConceptScore W2609059122C71924100 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConceptScore W2609059122C86803240 @default.
• W2609059122 hasConceptScore W2609059122C99454951 @default.
• W2609059122 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2609059122 hasLocation W26090591221 @default.
• W2609059122 hasLocation W26090591222 @default.
• W2609059122 hasLocation W26090591223 @default.
• W2609059122 hasLocation W26090591224 @default.
• W2609059122 hasOpenAccess W2609059122 @default.
• W2609059122 hasPrimaryLocation W26090591221 @default.
• W2609059122 hasRelatedWork W1976726647 @default.
• W2609059122 hasRelatedWork W1979195128 @default.
• W2609059122 hasRelatedWork W2014876108 @default.
• W2609059122 hasRelatedWork W2079931221 @default.
• W2609059122 hasRelatedWork W2163045200 @default.
• W2609059122 hasRelatedWork W2291512459 @default.
• W2609059122 hasRelatedWork W2294735749 @default.
• W2609059122 hasRelatedWork W2594378214 @default.
• W2609059122 hasRelatedWork W2967968956 @default.
• W2609059122 hasRelatedWork W2605627633 @default.
• W2609059122 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W2609059122 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2609059122 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2609059122 magId "2609059122" @default.
• W2609059122 workType "article" @default.