Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2612355280> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 75 of
75
with 100 items per page.
- W2612355280 abstract "This literature review was undertaken at the request of Grosvenor Estates in order to better understand the academic context and literature around the perceived phenomenon of the privatisation of public space. The review considered a range of print material including peer reviewed academic papers (the focus of the study), newspaper articles, and reports and position papers by public bodies / think tanks. The subject is, in short, a complex and nuanced one. Some writers are very vocal opponents of private-owned public space. Such criticism is arguably a natural and important consequence of the social and economic patterns which are playing out at the interface of public and private domains. Others take a more pragmatic view and see the partnership between public and private interests as addressing the changing governance model of cities, and as a way of providing high quality, desirable 'public' space for the contemporary city. The review explores issues such as: - how is the public defined?- how is public space defined?- is there clarity over the extent to which private operators have assumed ownership of once public space, compared with providing access to space that was formerly inaccessible?- do all public spaces have to serve all publics? Is there a danger that, in seeking to be open to all social groups, public spaces might satisfy nobody?- do the boundary conditions clearly demarcate the public/private interface, or is the threshold zone more fuzzy and indeterminate? How does a user know where they are? Does the user need to know anything of the ownership of the space they are in?- is there a distinction between private and civic space?- how does society guide and moderate behaviours, and how does the control of these behaviours vary (if at all) between the public and private sectors?- how might an urban “right to roam” change the user/owner culture? Might a “law of place” be a useful way forward?As such it serves as solid basis for further exploration of the themes discussed so as to enhance knowledge and to impact upon the future design of urban public space." @default.
- W2612355280 created "2017-05-19" @default.
- W2612355280 creator A5042719184 @default.
- W2612355280 creator A5053674585 @default.
- W2612355280 date "2017-01-02" @default.
- W2612355280 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2612355280 title "A literature review on the privatisation of public space" @default.
- W2612355280 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2612355280 type Work @default.
- W2612355280 sameAs 2612355280 @default.
- W2612355280 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2612355280 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2612355280 hasAuthorship W2612355280A5042719184 @default.
- W2612355280 hasAuthorship W2612355280A5053674585 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C170154142 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C2776050585 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C2778572836 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C2984866010 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C39389867 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C111919701 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C127413603 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C144024400 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C162324750 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C166957645 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C170154142 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C17744445 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C187736073 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C199539241 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C2776050585 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C2778572836 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C2779343474 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C2984866010 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C39389867 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C39549134 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C41008148 @default.
- W2612355280 hasConceptScore W2612355280C95457728 @default.
- W2612355280 hasLocation W26123552801 @default.
- W2612355280 hasOpenAccess W2612355280 @default.
- W2612355280 hasPrimaryLocation W26123552801 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W1566481782 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W1607574731 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W171940559 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W19068035 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W1964994162 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W1996209250 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W2104423695 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W2138232899 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W2138840784 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W2334933679 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W2592423331 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W2798453232 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W293172267 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W3008502224 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W3122660422 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W3142840881 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W319894559 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W354021673 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W2403379938 @default.
- W2612355280 hasRelatedWork W2546616878 @default.
- W2612355280 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2612355280 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2612355280 magId "2612355280" @default.
- W2612355280 workType "article" @default.