FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2612451505> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2612451505 abstract "Higher educational buildings (HEB) are believed to have a key function that affects notonly the environment, but also human and economic resources. Inevitably, the growingstudent population with various learning activities in public university buildings hasexacerbated space inefficiency, ventilation discomfort and inadequacy of facilities.These malfunctions not only affect the buildings and sustainability, but in addition theusers are also likely to be directly impacted in terms of health and safety risk. Inaccordance with the Government’s instruction on the holistic management of assetsthrough General Circular (No.1) dated 27th March 2009, all managements shouldundertake a systematic approach to achieve building performance optimization.However, a proactive tool to measure performance and users’ risk is still lacking in thecurrent assessment or maintenance of HEBs. Therefore, this research set out to developa building performance risk rating tool, as a performance assessment measureconcerning users’ health and safety risks in HEBs. The research has four objectives: i)to identify the current concept of building performance assessment used for HEBs, ii) toidentify the indicators that contribute to the performance requirement and the users’health and safety risk, iii) to determine the relative importance score as aweightage/rating in the construct of performance-risk indicators, and iv) to develop abuilding performance rating tool covering both building performance level and users’risk level. This study adopted a mixed-mode approach that involves both quantitativeand qualitative methods. To achieve the first and the second research objectives, thedeterminants of the indicators were initially compiled from the literature and theprevious building assessment tool. They were further confirmed through semistructuredinterviews involving 18 building managers in Malaysia’s public HEBs. Thefindings identified 26 indicators to be incorporated into the list of assessments. Theywere categorised as functional, technical and indoor environmental performanceindicators. In the next stage, questionnaires and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)method was used to achieve the third research objective. Twelve experts from theleading facilities management organisation agreed to participate in the survey ratingprocess. The weightings of the indicators were extracted using the computer software,Expert Choice 11. The AHP results ranked five indicators as the most importantindicators; structural stability (14.9%), fire prevention services (9.1%), building-relatedillnesses (7.4%), emergency exits (6.8%) and electrical services (6.3%). The totalweightings from overall indicators also summed up the weights for technicalperformance (49.9%), functional performance (36.7%), and indoor environmentalperformance (13.4%). From this result, the proposed tool was developed based on theprevious rating tool, and it comprised three steps of assessment. The first and the secondsteps evaluated each indicator, using the AHP weights and the performance assessmentscore. The third step summarised the assessed building by signifying a ratingclassification of “Excellent”, “Good”, “Medium”, “Low” or “Poor”, that suggestsfurther action to improve performance and mitigate users’ health and safety risk. Theproposed Building Performance-Risk Tool (BPRRT) has a significant contribution tomake as an improved proactive measure for performance assessment in HEBs. Theestablishment of the BPRRT was successfully employed as an aid of improvementtowards the current performance assessment of HEB by emerging the concept ofbuilding performance and risk into a numerical strategic approach. With this tool,explanatory studies of building performance and users’ risk can be conducted with morereliable data." @default.
• W2612451505 created "2017-05-19" @default.
• W2612451505 creator A5010862002 @default.
• W2612451505 date "2016-08-15" @default.
• W2612451505 modified "2023-09-22" @default.
• W2612451505 title "Incorporating risk mitigation into building performance rating tools (BPRTs) for Malaysia’s Higher Education Building / Natasha Khalil" @default.
• W2612451505 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2612451505 type Work @default.
• W2612451505 sameAs 2612451505 @default.
• W2612451505 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2612451505 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W2612451505 hasAuthorship W2612451505A5010862002 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C12174686 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C135510737 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C170154142 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C32896092 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C66204764 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C10138342 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C112930515 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C12174686 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C127413603 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C135510737 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C138885662 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C144133560 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C162853370 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C170154142 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C18903297 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C2778137410 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C2908647359 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C32896092 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C38652104 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C41008148 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C41895202 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C66204764 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C71924100 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C86803240 @default.
• W2612451505 hasConceptScore W2612451505C99454951 @default.
• W2612451505 hasLocation W26124515051 @default.
• W2612451505 hasOpenAccess W2612451505 @default.
• W2612451505 hasPrimaryLocation W26124515051 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W148823439 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W1676884606 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W1963091394 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W2080818162 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W2182793495 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W2271070645 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W2282816287 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W2500346469 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W2647655995 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W2735664251 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W2897539890 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W2898691542 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W2972770044 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W3029530805 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W3046298076 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W3126655254 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W3190509217 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W1725866727 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W2113944287 @default.
• W2612451505 hasRelatedWork W2608107781 @default.
• W2612451505 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2612451505 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2612451505 magId "2612451505" @default.
• W2612451505 workType "dissertation" @default.