FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2613417311> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2613417311 endingPage "e158" @default.
• W2613417311 startingPage "e158" @default.
• W2613417311 abstract "The application of technology in the area of dietary assessment has resulted in the development of an array of tools, which are often specifically designed for a particular country or region.The aim of this study was to describe the development, validation, and user evaluation of a Web-based dietary assessment tool Foodbook24.Foodbook24 is a Web-based, dietary assessment tool consisting of a 24-hour dietary recall (24HDR) and food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) alongside supplementary questionnaires. Validity of the 24HDR component was assessed by 40 participants, who completed 3 nonconsecutive, self-administered 24HDR using Foodbook24 and a 4-day semi-weighed food diary at separate time points. Participants also provided fasted blood samples and 24-hour urine collections for the identification of biomarkers of nutrient and food group intake during each recording period. Statistical analyses on the nutrient and food group intake data derived from each method were performed in SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS Inc). Mean nutrient intakes (and standard deviations) recorded using each method of dietary assessment were calculated. Spearman and Pearson correlations, Wilcoxon Signed Rank and Paired t test were used to investigate the agreement and differences between the nutritional output from Foodbook24 (test method) and the 4-day semi-weighed food diary (reference method). Urinary and plasma biomarkers of nutrient intake were used as an objective validation of Foodbook24. To investigate the user acceptability of Foodbook24, participants from different studies involved with Foodbook24 were asked to complete an evaluation questionnaire.For nutrient intake, correlations between the dietary assessment methods were acceptable to very good in strength and statistically significant (range r=.32 to .75). There were some significant differences between reported mean intakes of micronutrients recorded by both methods; however, with the exception of protein (P=.03), there were no significant differences in the reporting of energy or macronutrient intake. Of the 19 food groups investigated in this analysis, there were significant differences between 6 food groups reported by both methods. Spearman correlations for biomarkers of nutrient and food group intake and reported intake were similar for both methods. A total of 118 participants evaluated the acceptability of Foodbook24. The tool was well-received and the majority, 67.8% (80/118), opted for Foodbook24 as the preferred method for future dietary intake assessment when compared against a traditional interviewer led recall and semi-weighed food diary.The results of this study demonstrate the validity and user acceptability of Foodbook24. The results also highlight the potential of Foodbook24, a Web-based dietary assessment method, and present a viable alternative to nutritional surveillance in Ireland." @default.
• W2613417311 created "2017-05-19" @default.
• W2613417311 creator A5007540915 @default.
• W2613417311 creator A5011016998 @default.
• W2613417311 creator A5021665431 @default.
• W2613417311 creator A5036551416 @default.
• W2613417311 creator A5047951442 @default.
• W2613417311 creator A5055149253 @default.
• W2613417311 creator A5057766003 @default.
• W2613417311 creator A5088234248 @default.
• W2613417311 date "2017-05-11" @default.
• W2613417311 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2613417311 title "The Development, Validation, and User Evaluation of Foodbook24: A Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool Developed for the Irish Adult Population" @default.
• W2613417311 cites W1515767960 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W1572100383 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W1861519250 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W1902505303 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W1962874603 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W1963719539 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W1966398346 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W1966608444 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W1987608603 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2001472813 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2013054411 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2015795623 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2019345330 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2025393397 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2037105492 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2043684639 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2055932566 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2062158347 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2064027882 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2064103401 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2074707768 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2086691970 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2088060170 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2092090987 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2104644780 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2107471613 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2113357548 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2121825214 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2123370274 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2127817425 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2128117277 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2130639406 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2137429762 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2145862652 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2145996925 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2149886133 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2156804146 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2158239180 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2163444326 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2171648622 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W2313773532 @default.
• W2613417311 cites W4211237791 @default.
• W2613417311 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6407" @default.
• W2613417311 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5445234" @default.
• W2613417311 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28495662" @default.
• W2613417311 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2613417311 type Work @default.
• W2613417311 sameAs 2613417311 @default.
• W2613417311 citedByCount "49" @default.
• W2613417311 countsByYear W26134173112017 @default.
• W2613417311 countsByYear W26134173112018 @default.
• W2613417311 countsByYear W26134173112019 @default.
• W2613417311 countsByYear W26134173112020 @default.
• W2613417311 countsByYear W26134173112021 @default.
• W2613417311 countsByYear W26134173112022 @default.
• W2613417311 countsByYear W26134173112023 @default.
• W2613417311 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2613417311 hasAuthorship W2613417311A5007540915 @default.
• W2613417311 hasAuthorship W2613417311A5011016998 @default.
• W2613417311 hasAuthorship W2613417311A5021665431 @default.
• W2613417311 hasAuthorship W2613417311A5036551416 @default.
• W2613417311 hasAuthorship W2613417311A5047951442 @default.
• W2613417311 hasAuthorship W2613417311A5055149253 @default.
• W2613417311 hasAuthorship W2613417311A5057766003 @default.
• W2613417311 hasAuthorship W2613417311A5088234248 @default.
• W2613417311 hasBestOaLocation W26134173111 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConcept C12868164 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConcept C129230472 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConcept C159744936 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConcept C206041023 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConcept C2780662849 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConceptScore W2613417311C105795698 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConceptScore W2613417311C126322002 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConceptScore W2613417311C12868164 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConceptScore W2613417311C129230472 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConceptScore W2613417311C159744936 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConceptScore W2613417311C206041023 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConceptScore W2613417311C2780662849 @default.
• W2613417311 hasConceptScore W2613417311C2908647359 @default.

• next