FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2616129122> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2616129122 endingPage "1731" @default.
• W2616129122 startingPage "1726" @default.
• W2616129122 abstract "Background Recent developments in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have focused on changes in several design-related parameters, including humeral component design, to allow for easier convertibility. Alterations in humeral inclination and offset on shoulder kinematics may have a relevant influence on postoperative outcome. This study used a virtual computer simulation to evaluate the influence of humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization on range of motion in onlay design RSA. Methods Three-dimensional RSA computer templating was created from computed tomography (CT) scans in 20 patients undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty for concentric osteoarthritis (Walch A1). Two concurrent factors were tested for impingement-free range of motion: humeral inclination (135° vs. 145°) and glenoid lateralization (0 mm vs. 5 mm). Results Decreasing the humeral neck shaft angle demonstrated a significant increase in impingement-free range of motion. Compared to the 145° configuration, extension was increased by 42.3° (−8.5° to 73.5°), adduction by 15° (10° to 23°), and external rotation with the arm at side by 15.1° (8.5° to 26.5°); however, abduction was decreased by 6.5° (−1° to 12.5°). Glenoid lateralization led to comparable results, but an additional increase in abduction of 7.6° (−1° to 16.5°) and forward flexion of 26.6° (6.5° to 62°) was observed. Conclusion Lower humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization are effective for improvement in range of motion after RSA. The use of the 135° model with 5 mm of glenoid lateralization provided the best results in impingement-free range of motion, except for abduction. Recent developments in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have focused on changes in several design-related parameters, including humeral component design, to allow for easier convertibility. Alterations in humeral inclination and offset on shoulder kinematics may have a relevant influence on postoperative outcome. This study used a virtual computer simulation to evaluate the influence of humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization on range of motion in onlay design RSA. Three-dimensional RSA computer templating was created from computed tomography (CT) scans in 20 patients undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty for concentric osteoarthritis (Walch A1). Two concurrent factors were tested for impingement-free range of motion: humeral inclination (135° vs. 145°) and glenoid lateralization (0 mm vs. 5 mm). Decreasing the humeral neck shaft angle demonstrated a significant increase in impingement-free range of motion. Compared to the 145° configuration, extension was increased by 42.3° (−8.5° to 73.5°), adduction by 15° (10° to 23°), and external rotation with the arm at side by 15.1° (8.5° to 26.5°); however, abduction was decreased by 6.5° (−1° to 12.5°). Glenoid lateralization led to comparable results, but an additional increase in abduction of 7.6° (−1° to 16.5°) and forward flexion of 26.6° (6.5° to 62°) was observed. Lower humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization are effective for improvement in range of motion after RSA. The use of the 135° model with 5 mm of glenoid lateralization provided the best results in impingement-free range of motion, except for abduction." @default.
• W2616129122 created "2017-05-26" @default.
• W2616129122 creator A5001461408 @default.
• W2616129122 creator A5001929933 @default.
• W2616129122 creator A5050092854 @default.
• W2616129122 date "2017-10-01" @default.
• W2616129122 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2616129122 title "The influence of humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty" @default.
• W2616129122 cites W1574788440 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W1954846082 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W1970114636 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W1983706797 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W1984465135 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W1985190408 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W1986500227 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W1987150611 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W1987267711 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W2001496935 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W2006622018 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W2046253260 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W2052234491 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W2071782838 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W2077884248 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W2141022789 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W2226499139 @default.
• W2616129122 cites W2279405105 @default.
• W2616129122 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.032" @default.
• W2616129122 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28528016" @default.
• W2616129122 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2616129122 type Work @default.
• W2616129122 sameAs 2616129122 @default.
• W2616129122 citedByCount "120" @default.
• W2616129122 countsByYear W26161291222018 @default.
• W2616129122 countsByYear W26161291222019 @default.
• W2616129122 countsByYear W26161291222020 @default.
• W2616129122 countsByYear W26161291222021 @default.
• W2616129122 countsByYear W26161291222022 @default.
• W2616129122 countsByYear W26161291222023 @default.
• W2616129122 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2616129122 hasAuthorship W2616129122A5001461408 @default.
• W2616129122 hasAuthorship W2616129122A5001929933 @default.
• W2616129122 hasAuthorship W2616129122A5050092854 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConcept C39920418 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConcept C74650414 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConcept C79840881 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConceptScore W2616129122C121332964 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConceptScore W2616129122C141071460 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConceptScore W2616129122C2778336525 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConceptScore W2616129122C29694066 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConceptScore W2616129122C39920418 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConceptScore W2616129122C548259974 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConceptScore W2616129122C60465272 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConceptScore W2616129122C71924100 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConceptScore W2616129122C74650414 @default.
• W2616129122 hasConceptScore W2616129122C79840881 @default.
• W2616129122 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2616129122 hasLocation W26161291221 @default.
• W2616129122 hasLocation W26161291222 @default.
• W2616129122 hasOpenAccess W2616129122 @default.
• W2616129122 hasPrimaryLocation W26161291221 @default.
• W2616129122 hasRelatedWork W122584421 @default.
• W2616129122 hasRelatedWork W2066693961 @default.
• W2616129122 hasRelatedWork W2351643838 @default.
• W2616129122 hasRelatedWork W2368363778 @default.
• W2616129122 hasRelatedWork W2753351751 @default.
• W2616129122 hasRelatedWork W2889348933 @default.
• W2616129122 hasRelatedWork W3033677963 @default.
• W2616129122 hasRelatedWork W3185180338 @default.
• W2616129122 hasRelatedWork W4244295168 @default.
• W2616129122 hasRelatedWork W4304695312 @default.
• W2616129122 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W2616129122 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2616129122 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2616129122 magId "2616129122" @default.
• W2616129122 workType "article" @default.