FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2616304820> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2616304820 endingPage "1697" @default.
• W2616304820 startingPage "1697" @default.
• W2616304820 abstract "Patients who have pain and dysfunction from glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency have few treatment options. The goal of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the short-term results of arthroplasty with use of the Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis in the management of this problem.We report the results for sixty patients (sixty shoulders) with a rotator cuff deficiency and glenohumeral arthritis who were followed for a minimum of two years. Thirty-five patients had no previous shoulder surgery, whereas twenty-three had had either an open or arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, one had had a subacromial decompression, and one had had a biceps tendon repair. All patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scoring system for pain and function and with visual analog scales for pain and function. They were also asked to rate their satisfaction with the outcome. The shoulder range of motion was measured preoperatively and postoperatively.The average age of the patients was seventy-one years. The average duration of follow-up was thirty-three months. All measures improved significantly (p < 0.0001). The mean total score on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons system improved from 34.3 to 68.2; the mean function score, from 16.1 to 29.4; and the mean pain score, from 18.2 to 38.7. The score for function on the visual analog scale improved from 2.7 to 6.0, and the score for pain on the visual analog scale improved from 6.3 to 2.2. Forward flexion increased from 55.0 degrees to 105.1 degrees, and abduction increased from 41.4 degrees to 101.8 degrees. Forty-one of the sixty patients rated the outcome as good or excellent; sixteen were satisfied, and three were dissatisfied. There were a total of thirteen complications in ten patients (17%). Seven patients (12%) had eight failures, requiring revision surgery to another Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis in five patients (one shoulder had two revisions) and revision to a hemiarthroplasty in two patients because of deep infection.The data from this study suggest that arthroplasty with the Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis may be a viable treatment for patients with glenohumeral arthritis and a massive rotator cuff tear. However, future studies will be necessary to determine the longevity of the implant and whether it will provide continued improvement in function." @default.
• W2616304820 created "2017-05-26" @default.
• W2616304820 creator A5015168184 @default.
• W2616304820 creator A5044040074 @default.
• W2616304820 creator A5046218448 @default.
• W2616304820 creator A5062684595 @default.
• W2616304820 creator A5068177749 @default.
• W2616304820 creator A5077660156 @default.
• W2616304820 date "2005-08-01" @default.
• W2616304820 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2616304820 title "The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for Glenohumeral Arthritis Associated with Severe Rotator Cuff Deficiency<sbt aid=1022701>A Minimum Two-Year Follow-up Study of Sixty Patients</sbt>" @default.
• W2616304820 cites W1536810745 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W1537618689 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W1841387130 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W1946493172 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W1949434679 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W1962136244 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W1963574752 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W1988653356 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2001496935 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2021037465 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2041438603 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2048287265 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2069454610 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2080163719 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2089267437 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2108752772 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2138829659 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2139114975 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2161341973 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2164662785 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2171701625 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2261610767 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2271435876 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2273824762 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2289557621 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2342356234 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2425738901 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2470221251 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2984501923 @default.
• W2616304820 cites W2099088149 @default.
• W2616304820 doi "https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.d.02813" @default.
• W2616304820 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16085607" @default.
• W2616304820 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2616304820 type Work @default.
• W2616304820 sameAs 2616304820 @default.
• W2616304820 citedByCount "426" @default.
• W2616304820 countsByYear W26163048202012 @default.
• W2616304820 countsByYear W26163048202013 @default.
• W2616304820 countsByYear W26163048202014 @default.
• W2616304820 countsByYear W26163048202015 @default.
• W2616304820 countsByYear W26163048202016 @default.
• W2616304820 countsByYear W26163048202017 @default.
• W2616304820 countsByYear W26163048202018 @default.
• W2616304820 countsByYear W26163048202019 @default.
• W2616304820 countsByYear W26163048202020 @default.
• W2616304820 countsByYear W26163048202021 @default.
• W2616304820 countsByYear W26163048202022 @default.
• W2616304820 countsByYear W26163048202023 @default.
• W2616304820 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2616304820 hasAuthorship W2616304820A5015168184 @default.
• W2616304820 hasAuthorship W2616304820A5044040074 @default.
• W2616304820 hasAuthorship W2616304820A5046218448 @default.
• W2616304820 hasAuthorship W2616304820A5062684595 @default.
• W2616304820 hasAuthorship W2616304820A5068177749 @default.
• W2616304820 hasAuthorship W2616304820A5077660156 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConcept C2776511800 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConcept C2777077863 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConcept C2777325788 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConcept C2778715743 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConcept C2780457017 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConceptScore W2616304820C126322002 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConceptScore W2616304820C141071460 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConceptScore W2616304820C14184104 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConceptScore W2616304820C2776511800 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConceptScore W2616304820C2777077863 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConceptScore W2616304820C2777325788 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConceptScore W2616304820C2778336525 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConceptScore W2616304820C2778715743 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConceptScore W2616304820C2780457017 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConceptScore W2616304820C2781184374 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConceptScore W2616304820C60465272 @default.
• W2616304820 hasConceptScore W2616304820C71924100 @default.
• W2616304820 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2616304820 hasLocation W26163048201 @default.
• W2616304820 hasLocation W26163048202 @default.
• W2616304820 hasOpenAccess W2616304820 @default.
• W2616304820 hasPrimaryLocation W26163048201 @default.
• W2616304820 hasRelatedWork W1988578910 @default.
• W2616304820 hasRelatedWork W1992085340 @default.
• W2616304820 hasRelatedWork W2010756009 @default.

• next