FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2616679476> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2616679476 endingPage "252" @default.
• W2616679476 startingPage "247" @default.
• W2616679476 abstract "o objetivo deste estudo prospectivo, randômico e duplo‐cego foi investigar os efeitos do uso diferente de esmolol na resposta hemodinâmica à laringoscopia, intubação orotraqueal e esternotomia em cirurgia de revascularização coronária. após obter a aprovação do Comitê de Ética local e consentimento informado assinado pelos pacientes, 45 pacientes foram randomicamente divididos em três grupos. O Grupo I (infusão) recebeu 0,5 mg/kg/min de esmolol em infusão a partir de 10 min antes da intubação até 5 minutos após a esternotomia; o Brupo B (bolus) recebeu 1,5 mg/kg de esmolol em bolus IV a partir de 2 min antes da intubação e esternotomia; o grupo C (controle) recebeu NaCl a 0,9%. Todos os parâmetros demográficos foram registados. Os valores de frequência cardíaca e pressão arterial foram registrados desde antes da infusão até a indução da anestesia a cada minuto, durante a intubação endotraqueal, a cada minuto durante 10 min após a intubação endotraqueal e antes, durante e após a esternotomia no primeiro e quinto minutos. enquanto a área sob a curva (ASC) (SAP × tempo) foi maior nos grupos B e C que no Grupo I, a ASC (SAP × Tint e Tst) e ASC (SAP × T2) foram maiores nos grupos B e C que no Grupo I (p < 0,05). Além disso, a ASC (FC × Tst)) foi menor no Grupo B que no Grupo C, mas não houve diferença significante entre os grupos B e I. este estudo destaca que a administração de esmolol em infusão é mais eficaz que em bolus para controlar a pressão arterial sistólica durante a intubação endotraqueal e esternotomia em CRC. The aim of this randomized, prospective and double blinded study is to investigate effects of different esmolol use on hemodynamic response of laryngoscopy, endotracheal intubation and sternotomy in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. After approval of local ethics committee and patients’ written informed consent, 45 patients were randomized into three groups equally. In Infusion Group; from 10 min before intubation up to 5th minute after sternotomy, 0.5 mg/kg/min esmolol infusion, in Bolus Group; 2 min before intubation and sternotomy 1.5 mg/kg esmolol IV bolus and in Control Group; %0.9 NaCl was administered. All demographic parameters were recorded. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded before infusion up to anesthesia induction in every minute, during endotracheal intubation, every minute for 10 minutes after endotracheal intubation and before, during and after sternotomy at first and fifth minutes. While area under curve (AUC) (SAP × time) was being found more in Group B and C than Group I, AUC (SAP × Tint and Tst) and AUC (SAP × T2) was found more in Group B and C than Group I (p < 0.05). Moreover AUC (HR × Tst) was found less in Group B than Group C but no significant difference was found between Group B and Group I. This study highlights that esmolol infusion is more effective than esmolol bolus administration on controlling systolic arterial pressure during endotracheal intubation and sternotomy in CABG surgery." @default.
• W2616679476 created "2017-05-26" @default.
• W2616679476 creator A5010894047 @default.
• W2616679476 creator A5013730794 @default.
• W2616679476 creator A5014283420 @default.
• W2616679476 creator A5024385320 @default.
• W2616679476 creator A5067989123 @default.
• W2616679476 date "2014-07-01" @default.
• W2616679476 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2616679476 title "Comparação de esmolol em bolus e infusão contínua na resposta hemodinâmica à laringoscopia, intubação orotraqueal e esternotomia em cirurgia de revascularização coronária" @default.
• W2616679476 cites W1964626877 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W1972036973 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W1981591620 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W1987426280 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W1988091700 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W1989886075 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W2000302137 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W2007717419 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W2015571845 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W2017681257 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W2020329588 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W2029742165 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W2035878472 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W2066915922 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W2067182678 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W2080013945 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W2112709764 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W2145738275 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W2194274638 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W2324517003 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W23351141 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W248355951 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W4230306597 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W4234190633 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W4245719088 @default.
• W2616679476 cites W4253822127 @default.
• W2616679476 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2013.07.003" @default.
• W2616679476 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25096769" @default.
• W2616679476 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2616679476 type Work @default.
• W2616679476 sameAs 2616679476 @default.
• W2616679476 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2616679476 countsByYear W26166794762017 @default.
• W2616679476 countsByYear W26166794762019 @default.
• W2616679476 countsByYear W26166794762020 @default.
• W2616679476 countsByYear W26166794762021 @default.
• W2616679476 countsByYear W26166794762022 @default.
• W2616679476 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2616679476 hasAuthorship W2616679476A5010894047 @default.
• W2616679476 hasAuthorship W2616679476A5013730794 @default.
• W2616679476 hasAuthorship W2616679476A5014283420 @default.
• W2616679476 hasAuthorship W2616679476A5024385320 @default.
• W2616679476 hasAuthorship W2616679476A5067989123 @default.
• W2616679476 hasBestOaLocation W26166794761 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConcept C2777953023 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConcept C2780996683 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConcept C43376680 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConceptScore W2616679476C126322002 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConceptScore W2616679476C141071460 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConceptScore W2616679476C2777953023 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConceptScore W2616679476C2780996683 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConceptScore W2616679476C29456083 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConceptScore W2616679476C42219234 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConceptScore W2616679476C43376680 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConceptScore W2616679476C71924100 @default.
• W2616679476 hasConceptScore W2616679476C84393581 @default.
• W2616679476 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2616679476 hasLocation W26166794761 @default.
• W2616679476 hasLocation W26166794762 @default.
• W2616679476 hasOpenAccess W2616679476 @default.
• W2616679476 hasPrimaryLocation W26166794761 @default.
• W2616679476 hasRelatedWork W1561891400 @default.
• W2616679476 hasRelatedWork W1972036973 @default.
• W2616679476 hasRelatedWork W1992162547 @default.
• W2616679476 hasRelatedWork W2015571845 @default.
• W2616679476 hasRelatedWork W2035878472 @default.
• W2616679476 hasRelatedWork W2048227264 @default.
• W2616679476 hasRelatedWork W2169102761 @default.
• W2616679476 hasRelatedWork W2395126159 @default.
• W2616679476 hasRelatedWork W2887453173 @default.
• W2616679476 hasRelatedWork W2943111235 @default.
• W2616679476 hasVolume "64" @default.
• W2616679476 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2616679476 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2616679476 magId "2616679476" @default.
• W2616679476 workType "article" @default.