FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2617370610> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2617370610 endingPage "149" @default.
• W2617370610 startingPage "145" @default.
• W2617370610 abstract "In the first part of this review, we provided currently accepted definitions of categories and subcategories of intimate partner violence and discussed the prevalence and health impacts of intimate partner violence in nonpregnant and pregnant women. Herein we review current recommendations for intimate partner violence screening and the evidence surrounding the effectiveness of intimate partner violence interventions. Screening for intimate partner violence may include exclusively identification of victims of intimate partner violence or both the identification of and intervention for victims. Until recently, many professional organizations did not recommend universal screening for intimate partner violence because of a lack of evidence of effectiveness of screening, lack of evidence demonstrating that screening is not harmful, and/or a lack of consensus regarding the most effective screening tool. The lack of evidence supporting an intervention posed an additional barrier to screening. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has been a staunch advocate for universal intimate partner violence screening, even when other groups either did not endorse screening or recommended it only for high-risk women. Recent published data confirm that screening is more reliable than usual care in identifying victims of intimate partner violence, both during pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. Likewise, recent published data show that there are no apparent harms of screening for intimate partner violence and that the act of screening may have an empowering effect on women and improve their relationship with and trust in their health care providers. Despite these findings, the implementation rate of intimate partner violence screening remains low. Most encouraging are the recent data showing that interventions performed after screening for intimate partner violence are effective in reducing depression symptoms and episodes of violence as well as improving some outcomes of pregnancy. Although there remains a lack of consensus regarding which screening tool may be the most effective, we exhort all obstetrician-gynecologists to screen all women for intimate partner violence at regular intervals and to familiarize themselves with available community resources to assist those women who have been identified as experiencing intimate partner violence through screening. In the first part of this review, we provided currently accepted definitions of categories and subcategories of intimate partner violence and discussed the prevalence and health impacts of intimate partner violence in nonpregnant and pregnant women. Herein we review current recommendations for intimate partner violence screening and the evidence surrounding the effectiveness of intimate partner violence interventions. Screening for intimate partner violence may include exclusively identification of victims of intimate partner violence or both the identification of and intervention for victims. Until recently, many professional organizations did not recommend universal screening for intimate partner violence because of a lack of evidence of effectiveness of screening, lack of evidence demonstrating that screening is not harmful, and/or a lack of consensus regarding the most effective screening tool. The lack of evidence supporting an intervention posed an additional barrier to screening. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has been a staunch advocate for universal intimate partner violence screening, even when other groups either did not endorse screening or recommended it only for high-risk women. Recent published data confirm that screening is more reliable than usual care in identifying victims of intimate partner violence, both during pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. Likewise, recent published data show that there are no apparent harms of screening for intimate partner violence and that the act of screening may have an empowering effect on women and improve their relationship with and trust in their health care providers. Despite these findings, the implementation rate of intimate partner violence screening remains low. Most encouraging are the recent data showing that interventions performed after screening for intimate partner violence are effective in reducing depression symptoms and episodes of violence as well as improving some outcomes of pregnancy. Although there remains a lack of consensus regarding which screening tool may be the most effective, we exhort all obstetrician-gynecologists to screen all women for intimate partner violence at regular intervals and to familiarize themselves with available community resources to assist those women who have been identified as experiencing intimate partner violence through screening." @default.
• W2617370610 created "2017-06-05" @default.
• W2617370610 creator A5007230104 @default.
• W2617370610 creator A5025015382 @default.
• W2617370610 creator A5062608085 @default.
• W2617370610 date "2017-08-01" @default.
• W2617370610 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2617370610 title "Intimate partner violence and pregnancy: screening and intervention" @default.
• W2617370610 cites W1484536910 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W1554028473 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W1967448179 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W1994904034 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2003280674 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2012777096 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2055537854 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2058289990 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2072701834 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2091502338 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2100154024 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2109966728 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2118472200 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2122630860 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2130513347 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2144394914 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2149456314 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2153259929 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2396570411 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2407418872 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W2617784856 @default.
• W2617370610 cites W4213357960 @default.
• W2617370610 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.043" @default.
• W2617370610 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28551447" @default.
• W2617370610 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2617370610 type Work @default.
• W2617370610 sameAs 2617370610 @default.
• W2617370610 citedByCount "50" @default.
• W2617370610 countsByYear W26173706102017 @default.
• W2617370610 countsByYear W26173706102018 @default.
• W2617370610 countsByYear W26173706102019 @default.
• W2617370610 countsByYear W26173706102020 @default.
• W2617370610 countsByYear W26173706102021 @default.
• W2617370610 countsByYear W26173706102022 @default.
• W2617370610 countsByYear W26173706102023 @default.
• W2617370610 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2617370610 hasAuthorship W2617370610A5007230104 @default.
• W2617370610 hasAuthorship W2617370610A5025015382 @default.
• W2617370610 hasAuthorship W2617370610A5062608085 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConcept C187155963 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConcept C2776436463 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConcept C526869908 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConcept C542059537 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConceptScore W2617370610C118552586 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConceptScore W2617370610C142724271 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConceptScore W2617370610C187155963 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConceptScore W2617370610C27415008 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConceptScore W2617370610C2776436463 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConceptScore W2617370610C2780665704 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConceptScore W2617370610C3017944768 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConceptScore W2617370610C512399662 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConceptScore W2617370610C526869908 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConceptScore W2617370610C542059537 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConceptScore W2617370610C545542383 @default.
• W2617370610 hasConceptScore W2617370610C71924100 @default.
• W2617370610 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2617370610 hasLocation W26173706101 @default.
• W2617370610 hasLocation W26173706102 @default.
• W2617370610 hasOpenAccess W2617370610 @default.
• W2617370610 hasPrimaryLocation W26173706101 @default.
• W2617370610 hasRelatedWork W1549441693 @default.
• W2617370610 hasRelatedWork W1967302349 @default.
• W2617370610 hasRelatedWork W1971447942 @default.
• W2617370610 hasRelatedWork W2031646479 @default.
• W2617370610 hasRelatedWork W2061249145 @default.
• W2617370610 hasRelatedWork W2071746478 @default.
• W2617370610 hasRelatedWork W2237087163 @default.
• W2617370610 hasRelatedWork W2260842574 @default.
• W2617370610 hasRelatedWork W2620591304 @default.
• W2617370610 hasRelatedWork W4211057816 @default.
• W2617370610 hasVolume "217" @default.
• W2617370610 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2617370610 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2617370610 magId "2617370610" @default.
• W2617370610 workType "article" @default.