FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2617850501> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2617850501 endingPage "184" @default.
• W2617850501 startingPage "179" @default.
• W2617850501 abstract "Self-management as management of the self:Future directions for healthcare and the promotion of mental health Gaston Franssen (bio) and Stefan van Geelen (bio) In a recent attempt to update the 1948 World Health Organization definition of health as a state of complete well-being and absence of disease, it has now been proposed to change its emphasis to the ability to adapt and self manage in the face of social, physical and emotional challenges (Huber et al., 2011). The question how we should conceptualize such self-management, however, is rarely raised and its theoretical foundations remain largely unexplained. Still, to an increasing extent, scholars, health professionals, researchers, caretakers and policy makers emphasize the great potential of self-management strategies in somatic as well as mental healthcare. Patients, so the argument runs, should not be treated merely as objects of diagnosis and treatment, but as expert clients, actively involved in the management of their own care. The advantages of this approach are considered twofold: it holds the prospect of more efficient and (cost)effective preventive and care strategies to promote mental health and well-being, and converges with recent research findings which acknowledge that incorporating the patients' subjective perspectives is beneficial to treatment progress. At the same time, it is clear that self-management in the context of mental healthcare poses profoundly challenging problems (Van Geelen, 2013; Van Geelen, 2014), as we need to take into account that it is often the self that is part and parcel of the problem in psychiatric and psychosomatic conditions (Kyrios et al., 2015; Santhouse, 2008; Sadler, 2007). In the context of mental healthcare, then, self-management confronts us with fundamental questions: what is our understanding of this self in psychosomatic and psychiatric settings, and how does that understanding, directly or indirectly, affect diagnoses, treatment plans and nosology in the fields of psychopathology and psychosomatic medicine? Answering such questions will also be of vital importance to a theoretically sound and practically relevant, implementable notion of self-management. Given the complexity of this subject matter, addressing such [End Page 179] problems requires an interdisciplinary approach, as we have argued in the introduction (Van Geelen & Franssen, 2017). A conceptual framework for self-management should integrate insights from a variety of disciplines, as it needs to acknowledge the multifaceted character of self-experience – with all its embodied, affective, cognitive, moral and social complexities. It is imperative, in other words, that insights in the structure and characteristics of self and self-experience as developed in humanities traditions – i.e., phenomenology, philosophy of mind and action, ethics, narrative theory – are brought into a dialogue with results obtained in psychiatric and psychosomatic research and practice. Conceptualizing selfexperience and selfmanagement: From embodiment to metacognition For this special issue, we asked nine specialists to explicate what they believe to be the fundamental dimensions of self-experience in mental healthcare, and to fully consider the consequences of those dimensions for adequate strategies of self-management in psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine. Their answers are rich and multifarious, as they cover a variety of psychopathologies – anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, unexplained chronic pain – and perspectives to self-management, but at the same time they converge at important points and move in compatible directions. Heribert Sattel and Peter Henningsen's take on self-management as a management of the self starts out from the perspective of contemporary psychosomatic medicine, which aims to integrate biological and psychological with interpersonal and social dimensions in the explanation, diagnosis and treatment of (unexplained) bodily complaints and disorders (Sattel & Henningsen, 2017). In order to conceptualize self-management in mental healthcare, they put forward the concept of the psychic structure, a developmental model of the self. Psychic structure refers to availability of mental functions for the regulation of the self and its relationships to internal and external objects: metaphorically, it can be understood as the functional capacities of the stage on which the drama of the self unfolds. The quality of the structure is described in terms of levels of integration: well-integrated psychic structures allow for a manifold of mental experiences to coexist and to be perceived differentially, while less integrated structures are characterized by intra-psychic conflicts – limited or..." @default.
• W2617850501 created "2017-06-05" @default.
• W2617850501 creator A5003076466 @default.
• W2617850501 creator A5006601029 @default.
• W2617850501 date "2017-01-01" @default.
• W2617850501 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2617850501 title "Self-management as management of the self: Future directions for healthcare and the promotion of mental health" @default.
• W2617850501 cites W1550568001 @default.
• W2617850501 cites W1588158447 @default.
• W2617850501 cites W1971707494 @default.
• W2617850501 cites W1980723437 @default.
• W2617850501 cites W2037778559 @default.
• W2617850501 cites W2053019072 @default.
• W2617850501 cites W2060894534 @default.
• W2617850501 cites W2090973213 @default.
• W2617850501 cites W2130899443 @default.
• W2617850501 cites W2167643701 @default.
• W2617850501 cites W2299904361 @default.
• W2617850501 cites W2617368327 @default.
• W2617850501 cites W2618167123 @default.
• W2617850501 cites W2618747300 @default.
• W2617850501 cites W2620032975 @default.
• W2617850501 cites W2620099190 @default.
• W2617850501 cites W2620116376 @default.
• W2617850501 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2017.0022" @default.
• W2617850501 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2617850501 type Work @default.
• W2617850501 sameAs 2617850501 @default.
• W2617850501 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2617850501 countsByYear W26178505012018 @default.
• W2617850501 countsByYear W26178505012021 @default.
• W2617850501 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2617850501 hasAuthorship W2617850501A5003076466 @default.
• W2617850501 hasAuthorship W2617850501A5006601029 @default.
• W2617850501 hasBestOaLocation W26178505012 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C17235551 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C2776933761 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C2779304628 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C98147612 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C119857082 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C126322002 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C134362201 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C144024400 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C151730666 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C15744967 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C160735492 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C17235551 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C17744445 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C199539241 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C2776933761 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C2779304628 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C2779343474 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C36289849 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C39549134 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C41008148 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C542102704 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C71924100 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C77805123 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C86803240 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C94625758 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C98147612 @default.
• W2617850501 hasConceptScore W2617850501C98184364 @default.
• W2617850501 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2617850501 hasLocation W26178505011 @default.
• W2617850501 hasLocation W26178505012 @default.
• W2617850501 hasOpenAccess W2617850501 @default.
• W2617850501 hasPrimaryLocation W26178505011 @default.
• W2617850501 hasRelatedWork W1842739385 @default.
• W2617850501 hasRelatedWork W2050520815 @default.
• W2617850501 hasRelatedWork W2113025531 @default.
• W2617850501 hasRelatedWork W2160344844 @default.
• W2617850501 hasRelatedWork W2365357113 @default.
• W2617850501 hasRelatedWork W2386276313 @default.
• W2617850501 hasRelatedWork W2618344088 @default.
• W2617850501 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2617850501 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2617850501 hasRelatedWork W3196456382 @default.
• W2617850501 hasVolume "24" @default.
• W2617850501 isParatext "false" @default.

• next