Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2618236821> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 77 of
77
with 100 items per page.
- W2618236821 endingPage "224" @default.
- W2618236821 startingPage "216" @default.
- W2618236821 abstract "Student assessment of other student's work has many potential benefits to learning for both the assessor and the assessed. However, sources of peer assessment provide, quite often, subjective evidence, which can be conflicting, uncertain and even ignorant. One of the key elements to providing an overall quality assessment of a student's work derived from the assessment by his/her peers is the use of an appropriate method of combining or fusing these heterogeneous evidence sources. Since the development of the belief theory introduced by Shafer in the 1970s, many combination rules have been proposed in the literature with two main methods selected here. The fi rst is an evidential reasoning (ER) approach, the kernel of which is an ER algorithm developed on the basis of the framework and the evidence combination rule of the Dempster-Shafer (DS) theory. It has been claimed also in the literature that Dempster's rule generates counter-intuitive and unacceptable results in practical situations, so an approach based on the Dezert-Smarandache (DSmT) theory of fusion will also be explored, in particular the PCR6 rule of proportional conflict redistribution. Results for peer assessment marks allocated by a student cohort, consisting of20 students, during their capstone projects, and, aggregated using each of these two approaches are compared with each other and with results obtained by the more traditional Averaging Rule (AR) approach. It is clear from the findings that when subjective evidence is aggregated then the simple AR approach as the accepted combination method is in doubt. It also seems that the DS method of aggregation seems the best alternative to traditional averaging." @default.
- W2618236821 created "2017-06-05" @default.
- W2618236821 creator A5058581746 @default.
- W2618236821 creator A5084272959 @default.
- W2618236821 date "2017-01-01" @default.
- W2618236821 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2618236821 title "Aggregating student peer assessment during capstone projects" @default.
- W2618236821 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2618236821 type Work @default.
- W2618236821 sameAs 2618236821 @default.
- W2618236821 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2618236821 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2618236821 hasAuthorship W2618236821A5058581746 @default.
- W2618236821 hasAuthorship W2618236821A5084272959 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConcept C178011137 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConcept C200601418 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConcept C2778293151 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConcept C2780586882 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConcept C3018395757 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConcept C3020001037 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConcept C53839665 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConceptScore W2618236821C111472728 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConceptScore W2618236821C11413529 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConceptScore W2618236821C119857082 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConceptScore W2618236821C127413603 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConceptScore W2618236821C138885662 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConceptScore W2618236821C145420912 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConceptScore W2618236821C154945302 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConceptScore W2618236821C15744967 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConceptScore W2618236821C178011137 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConceptScore W2618236821C200601418 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConceptScore W2618236821C2778293151 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConceptScore W2618236821C2780586882 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConceptScore W2618236821C3018395757 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConceptScore W2618236821C3020001037 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConceptScore W2618236821C41008148 @default.
- W2618236821 hasConceptScore W2618236821C53839665 @default.
- W2618236821 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2618236821 hasLocation W26182368211 @default.
- W2618236821 hasOpenAccess W2618236821 @default.
- W2618236821 hasPrimaryLocation W26182368211 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W1564844208 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W1777220308 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W2100369959 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W2114463407 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W2148660560 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W2327203075 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W2349007668 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W2375564727 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W2380697603 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W2383670154 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W2417649063 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W2607693525 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W2736884222 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W2780366513 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W2803033241 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W2912457312 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W2963921588 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W3012375008 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W398926217 @default.
- W2618236821 hasRelatedWork W576816797 @default.
- W2618236821 hasVolume "33" @default.
- W2618236821 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2618236821 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2618236821 magId "2618236821" @default.
- W2618236821 workType "article" @default.