FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2618744995> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2618744995 abstract "Phonological Neighborhood Density in Native and Non-Native Word Production Henrike K. Blumenfeld (k-blumenfeld@northwestern.edu) Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, 2240 Campus Drive Evanston, IL 60208 USA Viorica Marian (v-marian@northwestern.edu) Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, 2240 Campus Drive Evanston, IL 60208 USA in lexical access during language production in native and non-native speakers. Abstract The role of phonological neighborhood density in lexical access was examined during native- and non- native language production. German-English and English-German bilinguals named pictures of German words with high- and low-density neighborhoods. Results revealed that accuracy of picture naming was influenced by phonological neighborhood, with high-density neighborhoods facilitating lexical access in both the native and the non-native languages. However, latency of picture naming was facilitated by high-density phonological neighborhoods only in the non-native, but not the native, language. This suggests that native / non- native language status mediates the effect of phonological neighborhood on the speed of lexical access. Implications for native and non-native language processing dynamics are discussed. Neighborhood Density in Word Production In monolingual language production, activation of phonological representations similar to the target has been found to facilitate word access. For example, phonologically similar words have been found to facilitate naming during picture-word interference tasks (e.g., Costa & Sebastian-Galles, 1998). In studies focusing on tip-of- the-tongue (TOT) states, Meyer and Bock (1992) showed that priming with a phonologically similar word facilitated correct retrieval. Correspondingly, when phonological similarity was manipulated by varying neighborhood density, high-neighborhood targets have been found to produce fewer TOTs than low- neighborhood targets (e.g., Vitevitch & Sommers, 2003). Similar error patterns have also been observed in naturally-produced speech (Vitevitch, 1997). In picture naming tasks, targets with dense phonological neighborhoods have been found to be retrieved faster than targets with sparse phonological neighborhoods (e.g., Vitevitch, 2002). In sum, phonological similarity has consistently been found to facilitate monolingual lexical access across language production tasks (e.g., picture naming, picture-word interference, TOT-elicitation, naturally-produced speech). Neighborhood facilitation during word production has been ascribed to interactive feedback between lexical and phonological processing levels. Gordon and Dell (2001) simulated behavioral findings of neighborhood effects within the framework of an Interactive Spreading Activation Model of production (Dell, 1986). The model was based on three stages of language production: a semantic stage where word-meaning is chosen, a lemma stage where other lexical characteristics are identified, and a phonological stage where the word form is accessed. Simulations suggested that neighborhood facilitation in production is due to feedback between the lemma level and the phonological level during word selection. The lemma activates phonological representations, which in turn activate similar-sounding lemmas (i.e., the phonological neighborhood) that feed back onto the target’s phonological representations and increase their activation levels, facilitating their selection. Keywords: Language Processing; Bilingualism Introduction How alike are the mechanisms underlying native and non- native language processing? This question was examined by manipulating word similarity during native and non- native naming. Similarity and difference among words can be examined at the phonological, orthographic, lexical, and semantic levels. For example, the size of a word’s semantic network influences how fast the word can be accessed, with words that have larger semantic similarity neighborhoods processed faster than words with smaller semantic neighborhoods (e.g., Locker, Simpson, & Yates, 2003). In the same way, the size of a word’s phonological or orthographic neighborhood influences word access. A phonological neighbor is a word that differs from the target word by a single phoneme (Grainger, Muneaux, Farioli, & Ziegler, 2005; Yates, Locker, & Simpson, 2004). A word’s neighborhood size, also referred to as its neighborhood density, is the number of items that are highly similar to it. While phonology, orthography, and semantics are all subject to neighborhood density effects, with implications for lexical activation, the objective of the present study was to examine the role of phonological neighborhood density" @default.
• W2618744995 created "2017-06-05" @default.
• W2618744995 creator A5047492569 @default.
• W2618744995 creator A5064591727 @default.
• W2618744995 date "2006-01-01" @default.
• W2618744995 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2618744995 title "Phonological Neighborhood Density in Native and Non-Native Word Production" @default.
• W2618744995 cites W1971714115 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W1976552661 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W1991739681 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W1992216417 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2009916989 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2010734104 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2012143025 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2026066942 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2031874922 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2037948638 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2039311355 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2042094460 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2050751746 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2054040765 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2057147772 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2059271157 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2071591642 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2073257493 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2113116431 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2133331478 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2141953588 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2147236181 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2151338697 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2274200240 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2884980639 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W603444543 @default.
• W2618744995 cites W2094790441 @default.
• W2618744995 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2618744995 type Work @default.
• W2618744995 sameAs 2618744995 @default.
• W2618744995 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2618744995 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2618744995 hasAuthorship W2618744995A5047492569 @default.
• W2618744995 hasAuthorship W2618744995A5064591727 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConcept C148934300 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConcept C154775046 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConcept C171041071 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConcept C2776264592 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConceptScore W2618744995C138885662 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConceptScore W2618744995C148934300 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConceptScore W2618744995C154775046 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConceptScore W2618744995C15744967 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConceptScore W2618744995C169760540 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConceptScore W2618744995C169900460 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConceptScore W2618744995C171041071 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConceptScore W2618744995C2776264592 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConceptScore W2618744995C41008148 @default.
• W2618744995 hasConceptScore W2618744995C41895202 @default.
• W2618744995 hasIssue "28" @default.
• W2618744995 hasOpenAccess W2618744995 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W1976552661 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W2015436618 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W2019420636 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W2037294446 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W2041095998 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W2049812467 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W2054040765 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W2058737201 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W2090716776 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W2097789308 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W2098461427 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W223831923 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W2285348678 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W2314767694 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W2488620588 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W2624813221 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W2967209538 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W2986496463 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W3024905187 @default.
• W2618744995 hasRelatedWork W3093009926 @default.
• W2618744995 hasVolume "28" @default.
• W2618744995 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2618744995 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2618744995 magId "2618744995" @default.
• W2618744995 workType "article" @default.