FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2619189776> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2619189776 endingPage "218" @default.
• W2619189776 startingPage "213" @default.
• W2619189776 abstract "International Journal of Palliative NursingVol. 23, No. 5 Short reportLaw, ethics and end-of-life care: the policy and practice interface in EnglandSotirios Santatzoglou, Alison Kate Lillie, Anthony Wrigley, Sue Ashby, Sue Read, Andrew MooreSotirios SantatzoglouSearch for more papers by this author, Alison Kate LillieSearch for more papers by this author, Anthony WrigleySearch for more papers by this author, Sue AshbySearch for more papers by this author, Sue ReadSearch for more papers by this author, Andrew MooreSearch for more papers by this authorSotirios Santatzoglou; Alison Kate Lillie; Anthony Wrigley; Sue Ashby; Sue Read; Andrew MoorePublished Online:26 May 2017https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2017.23.5.213AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View article References Biggs H (2001) Euthanasia: Death with Dignity and the Law. Hart Publishing Google ScholarBingham J, Kirkup J (2014) ‘Assisted suicide moves closer as Government allows free vote.’ The Telegraph, England Google ScholarClark D (2007) From margins to the centre: A review of the history of palliative care in cancer. Lancet Oncol 8: 430–8 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarCohen S (2002) Folks Devils and Moral Panics. Routledge, London and New York Google ScholarCree VE, Clapton G, Smith M (2015) Preface in ‘Revisiting Moral Panics.’ Policy Press, London Crossref, Google ScholarDepartment of Health (DH) (2008) End-of-life Care Strategy: Promoting quality care for adults at the end-of-life. DH, London Google ScholarDepartment of Health (2012) End-of-life Care Strategy: Fourth Annual Report. DH, London Google ScholarDepartment of Health (2013) More Care Less Pathway. A review of the Liverpool Care Pathway. DH, London Google ScholarDevlin P (1986) Easing the Passing: The trial of Dr John Bodkin Adams. Faber and Faber, London and Boston Google Scholardu Bois-Pedain A (2003) ‘The human rights dimension of the Diane Pretty case’. Cambridge Law Journal 62: 181–206 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholardu Bois-Pedain A (2013) ‘The duty to preserve life and its limits in English criminal law’ in DJ BakerJ Horder (eds) The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Crossref, Google ScholarEllershaw J, Wilkinson S (2003) Care for the Dying: A Pathway to Excellence. Oxford University Press, Oxford Crossref, Google ScholarFreeman M (1999) ‘Death, Dying and the Human Rights Act 1998’. Current Legal Problems 52(1): 218–38 Crossref, Google ScholarGomes B, Calanzani N, Gysels M et al. (2013) Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care 12:7 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarHockley J (2008) ‘Policy and Palliative Care’, in (eds) Payne, SSeymour JIngleton C Palliative care nursing: Principles and evidence for practice, Second Edition. OUP, Oxford pp: 660–79 Google ScholarHouse of Commons (2009) Palliative Care Bill, Second Reading Google ScholarHouse of Commons (2015) Assisted Dying Bill, Second Reading Google ScholarHouse of Lords (1994) Debates v. 554 c1345 Google ScholarJost TS, Mendelson D (2003) A Comparative Study of the Law of Palliative Care and End-of-Life Treatment. J Law, Med Ethics 31(1): 130–43 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarKeown J (2002) Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. An Argument Against Legalisation. Cambridge Crossref, Google ScholarLawton J (1998) Contemporary Hospice Care: the Sequestration of the Unbounded Body and ‘Dirty Dying’. Sociology Health Illness 20: 121–43 Crossref, Google ScholarLeadership Alliance for the Care of Dying People (2014) One chance to get it right: Improving people's experience of care in the last few days and hours of life. Publications Gateway Reference 01509 Google ScholarMontgomery J, Jones C, Biggs H (2014) ‘Hidden LawMaking in the Province of Medical Jurisprudence’. Modern Law Review 77(3): 344–78 Google ScholarNational Council for Palliative Care (2014) The end-of-life care strategy. New ambitions, London Google ScholarNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2011) Quality standards for end-of-life care for adults. http://tinyurl.com/kbv9sp3 (accessed 4 May 2017) Google ScholarNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2015) Care of dying adults in the last days of life. NICE guideline, London Google ScholarNorrie A (2011) Legal Form and Moral Judgement: Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide in. The Structures of the Criminal Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google ScholarOehmichen M, Meissner C (2000) ‘Natural death’. Gerontology 46(2): 105–10 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarOffice of National Statistics (2012) Mortality Statistics: Deaths Registered in England and Wales (Series DR). http://tinyurl.com/kyuvsd4 (accessed 4 May 2017) Google ScholarOst S (2005) ‘Euthanasia and the defence of necessity: advocating a more appropriate legal response’. Criminal Law Review pp. 355–70 Google ScholarPaddy M (2011) Understanding nurse and patient perceptions of a ‘good death’. End-of-life Journal 1(2): 1–10 Crossref, Google ScholarParliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (2015) Dying without dignity. London Google ScholarPayne M (2015) ‘Assisted dying: moral panic or moral issue?’ in Revisiting Moral. Panics Policy Press, London Crossref, Google ScholarQuaghebeur T, Dierckx de Casterlé B, Gastmans C (2009) ‘Nursing and Euthanasia: a Review of Argument-Based Ethics Literature’. Nursing Ethics 16: 4466–86 Crossref, Google ScholarRaijmakers NJ1, van Zuylen L, Costantini M et al. (2011) Artificial nutrition and hydration in the last week of life in cancer patients. A systematic literature review of practices and effects. Ann Oncol 22(7): 1478–86 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarRoyal College of Physicians (2016) End-of-life Care Audit—Dying in Hospital. London Google ScholarSeale C (2009) End-of-life decisions in the UK involving medical practitioners. Palliat Med 23: 198–204 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarThomas C, Morris S, Clarke D (2004) Place of death: preferences among cancer patients and their carers. Social Science Med 58: 2431–44 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarThorns A, Sykes N (2000) Opioid use in last week of life and implications for end-of-life decision-making. Lancet 356(9227): 398–9 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarWilliams G (1983) Textbook of criminal law, 2nd ed. Stevens, London Google ScholarWood J, Clark D (2008) The historical development of inpatient services within United Kingdom and Ireland adult voluntary services. Palliat Med 22: 1–2 Crossref, Google ScholarWorld Health Organization (2002) World Health Organization Definition of Palliative Care. http://tinyurl.com/5228js (accessed 4 May 2017) Google ScholarWrigley A (2015) Ethics and End of Life Care: the Liverpool Care Pathway and the Neuberger Review. J Med Ethics 41: 639–43 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarCase LawAiredale NHS Trust v. Bland [1993] A.C.789 Google ScholarM v N [2015] EWCOP 76 Google ScholarR v Adams [1957] Crim.L.R. 365 Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails 2 May 2017Volume 23Issue 5ISSN (print): 1357-6321ISSN (online): 2052-286X Metrics History Published online 26 May 2017 Published in print 2 May 2017 Information© MA Healthcare LimitedPDF download" @default.
• W2619189776 created "2017-06-05" @default.
• W2619189776 creator A5013764429 @default.
• W2619189776 creator A5015532422 @default.
• W2619189776 creator A5038749725 @default.
• W2619189776 creator A5047990428 @default.
• W2619189776 creator A5055865907 @default.
• W2619189776 creator A5087559332 @default.
• W2619189776 date "2017-05-02" @default.
• W2619189776 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2619189776 title "Law, ethics and end-of-life care: the policy and practice interface in England" @default.
• W2619189776 cites W125174092 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W1565604706 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W1896618374 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W1995376301 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W2014625481 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W2022951817 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W2040868240 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W2045873505 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W2100652689 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W2112116207 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W2117985401 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W2132043166 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W2138255832 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W2144754645 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W2150379703 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W2153510453 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W2165538120 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W2477773531 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W267346564 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W4253370839 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W4256134355 @default.
• W2619189776 cites W4298056729 @default.
• W2619189776 doi "https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2017.23.5.213" @default.
• W2619189776 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28548909" @default.
• W2619189776 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2619189776 type Work @default.
• W2619189776 sameAs 2619189776 @default.
• W2619189776 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2619189776 countsByYear W26191897762020 @default.
• W2619189776 countsByYear W26191897762022 @default.
• W2619189776 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2619189776 hasAuthorship W2619189776A5013764429 @default.
• W2619189776 hasAuthorship W2619189776A5015532422 @default.
• W2619189776 hasAuthorship W2619189776A5038749725 @default.
• W2619189776 hasAuthorship W2619189776A5047990428 @default.
• W2619189776 hasAuthorship W2619189776A5055865907 @default.
• W2619189776 hasAuthorship W2619189776A5087559332 @default.
• W2619189776 hasBestOaLocation W26191897762 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConcept C113843644 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConcept C129307140 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConcept C157915830 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConcept C2780879335 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConcept C2994186709 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConcept C57879066 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConceptScore W2619189776C113843644 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConceptScore W2619189776C121332964 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConceptScore W2619189776C129307140 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConceptScore W2619189776C144024400 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConceptScore W2619189776C157915830 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConceptScore W2619189776C159110408 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConceptScore W2619189776C17744445 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConceptScore W2619189776C199539241 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConceptScore W2619189776C2780879335 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConceptScore W2619189776C2994186709 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConceptScore W2619189776C57879066 @default.
• W2619189776 hasConceptScore W2619189776C71924100 @default.
• W2619189776 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2619189776 hasLocation W26191897761 @default.
• W2619189776 hasLocation W26191897762 @default.
• W2619189776 hasLocation W26191897763 @default.
• W2619189776 hasOpenAccess W2619189776 @default.
• W2619189776 hasPrimaryLocation W26191897761 @default.
• W2619189776 hasRelatedWork W1998808158 @default.
• W2619189776 hasRelatedWork W2004552167 @default.
• W2619189776 hasRelatedWork W2046360139 @default.
• W2619189776 hasRelatedWork W2063646942 @default.
• W2619189776 hasRelatedWork W2317230173 @default.
• W2619189776 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2619189776 hasRelatedWork W2911173958 @default.
• W2619189776 hasRelatedWork W3176009699 @default.
• W2619189776 hasRelatedWork W4297237057 @default.
• W2619189776 hasRelatedWork W66900065 @default.
• W2619189776 hasVolume "23" @default.
• W2619189776 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2619189776 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2619189776 magId "2619189776" @default.
• W2619189776 workType "article" @default.