FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2619976853> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2619976853 abstract "The Architectural Review (AR) was founded at the end of the nineteenth century on the principle that architecture was part of a broad landscape of cultural activity. This meant that the discussion of architecture should seek to reach beyond architects and the allied professions to engage with artistic practitioners and writers, as well as government and planning officials, patrons and other interested and appreciative laymen. The editors and many of the contributors to the AR understood their role (and the role of the magazine) to be that of a cultural guide. From 1927 the AR was reinvented as a ‘Modern’ publication, experimenting with new forms of visual communication, content and tone, but these prior concerns remained consistent. This paper will explore how the magazine approached and presented its ‘guiding’ role in culture both on and off the printed page.The appointment of J.M. Richards as editor of the AR in 1935 further aligned with magazine’s founding principles with the current interests of Modern architecture. Throughout the 1930s the magazine consistently addressed a ‘public’ readership. This was not because the magazine had a broad public audience, but because it was increasingly preoccupied with questions of how to present Modern architecture to the public, how to discuss the role new role of modern architects. This imagined audience shaped the tone and content of much of the magazine. This paper will consider how the pages of the magazine and the spaces in which they were produced (the AR’s office and the homes of Richards and his friends and colleagues), were sites for the negotiation and definition of the ideas of Modern architecture in Britain; specifically, how Modern architecture conceived of its relationship to the public.The paper will explore how the debate between the expertise of the modern architect and the taste of the ‘public’ was both gendered (public ambivalence to Modern architecture was discussed in terms of untamed ‘feminine taste’ or uneducated female consumers) and class specific (the middle class educated public were targeted for persuasion and conversion, while the working class public were abstracted and spoken on behalf of, or ignored). Using articles published in the magazine and key players behind the production of the magazine, this paper will explore the negotiations at the AR between modern architecture and what one contributor labelled ‘the tyranny of public taste’." @default.
• W2619976853 created "2017-06-05" @default.
• W2619976853 creator A5037691112 @default.
• W2619976853 date "2017-06-15" @default.
• W2619976853 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2619976853 title "Debating architecture in the pages of the Architectural Press" @default.
• W2619976853 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2619976853 type Work @default.
• W2619976853 sameAs 2619976853 @default.
• W2619976853 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2619976853 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2619976853 hasAuthorship W2619976853A5037691112 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConcept C123657996 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConcept C2780583480 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConcept C82307848 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConceptScore W2619976853C107038049 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConceptScore W2619976853C123657996 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConceptScore W2619976853C124952713 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConceptScore W2619976853C138885662 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConceptScore W2619976853C142362112 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConceptScore W2619976853C144024400 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConceptScore W2619976853C153349607 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConceptScore W2619976853C17744445 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConceptScore W2619976853C199539241 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConceptScore W2619976853C2778137410 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConceptScore W2619976853C2780583480 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConceptScore W2619976853C29595303 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConceptScore W2619976853C41895202 @default.
• W2619976853 hasConceptScore W2619976853C82307848 @default.
• W2619976853 hasLocation W26199768531 @default.
• W2619976853 hasOpenAccess W2619976853 @default.
• W2619976853 hasPrimaryLocation W26199768531 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W1498601016 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W1594037751 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W1920395562 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W1949059985 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W1971612857 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W2005590137 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W2010332744 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W2147889548 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W2231105295 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W2315617075 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W273173555 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W2773442168 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W2947141487 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W3037801119 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W339721309 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W571968157 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W579685316 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W655339566 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W796467520 @default.
• W2619976853 hasRelatedWork W2671735765 @default.
• W2619976853 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2619976853 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2619976853 magId "2619976853" @default.
• W2619976853 workType "article" @default.