FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2620061279> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2620061279 endingPage "848" @default.
• W2620061279 startingPage "795" @default.
• W2620061279 abstract "Background Current international best practice recommendations urge breastfeeding for infants to be exclusively breastfed until six months of age, with recognition that any breastfeeding for as long as possible affords benefits. Babies that are not exclusively breastfed are subject to infectious, atopic and metabolic diseases. In fact, several factors are associated with lack of exclusive breastfeeding such as nulliparity, delivery by caesarean section, the neonate not being put on the mother’s chest after delivery, multiple births, male gender, low birth weight and in case when neonate was resuscitated. Adequate interventions should be undertaken to overcome those barriers. This study reviewed the impact of mobile phone interventions in improve exclusive breastfeeding. Objectives To assess the effectiveness of mobile phone in improving exclusive breastfeeding. Search methods Randomized control trials were searched from January 2016 until February 2017. We searched through: CENTRAL, MEDLINE via PUBMED, CINHAL, Scorpus, Web of science, handsearches of journals and the proceedings of major conferences Selection criteria We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing mobile phone intervention for improving breastfeeding. There was no language restriction. Data collection and analysis Two authors (JLT and LMM) independently identified and assessed all studies that met inclusion criteria. Study design, characteristics of study populations, interventions and controls and study results were extracted by JLT and LMM. Also, the risk of bias of included studies was assessed independently by two JLT and LMM. We reported the overall results for each outcome after meta-analysis. We reported the odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals for the different outcomes. Main results Based on the exclusive breastfeeding results, within one month, mobile phone interventions increased exclusive breastfeeding by 52% compared to the standard care (OR 1.52, 95%CI 1.25 to 1.84, 2130 participants, 7 RCTs). This result was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). The evidence was graded as high. As well as in two to three months postpartum, mobile phone intervention improved highly exclusive breastfeeding by 49% compared to the control group (OR 1.49, 95%CI 1.28 to 1.74, 3519 participants, 12 RCTs, p< 0.00001). Therefore, mobile phone intervention did not impact on exclusive breastfeeding within six months (OR 1.11, 95%CI 0.99 to 1.29, 3978 participants, 8 studies, p=0.17). In the other hand, formula feeding was more likely to be increased the standard care group compared to mobile phone intervention group in one month post-partum (OR 1.12 95%CI 0.85 to 1.47, 5 RCTs, 1358 participants, p-value=0.44). Even though, the result was not statistically significant. Therefore, within three months, formula feeding was significantly increased 27% compared to mobile phone group (OR 1.27 95%CI 1.05 to 1.54, 7 RCTS, 2359 participants, P=0.01). Lastly, formula feeding did not increase statistically after six months (OR 1.16 95%CI 0.99 to 1.35, 3066 participants, 5 RCTs, P = 0.06). Considering formula feeding, the overall evidence was moderate. Authors' conclusions Our findings have shown the importance of mobile phone intervention in promoting exclusive breastfeeding. However, mobile phone intervention could not improve exclusive from four to six months. Further interventions should be studied to enforce exclusive breastfeeding within this specific period." @default.
• W2620061279 created "2017-06-05" @default.
• W2620061279 creator A5036391115 @default.
• W2620061279 creator A5053436023 @default.
• W2620061279 creator A5057139136 @default.
• W2620061279 date "2017-05-04" @default.
• W2620061279 modified "2023-09-22" @default.
• W2620061279 title "Effectiveness of Mobile Phone Interventions in Improving Breastfeeding: Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials" @default.
• W2620061279 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2620061279 type Work @default.
• W2620061279 sameAs 2620061279 @default.
• W2620061279 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2620061279 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2620061279 hasAuthorship W2620061279A5036391115 @default.
• W2620061279 hasAuthorship W2620061279A5053436023 @default.
• W2620061279 hasAuthorship W2620061279A5057139136 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C2776279924 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C2776283161 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C3020294031 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C126322002 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C156957248 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C159110408 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C168563851 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C17744445 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C187212893 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C199539241 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C27415008 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C2776279924 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C2776283161 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C2779234561 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C2779473830 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C3020294031 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C512399662 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C54355233 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C71924100 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C86803240 @default.
• W2620061279 hasConceptScore W2620061279C95190672 @default.
• W2620061279 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2620061279 hasLocation W26200612791 @default.
• W2620061279 hasOpenAccess W2620061279 @default.
• W2620061279 hasPrimaryLocation W26200612791 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W1517194673 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W1957220344 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W2054877635 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W2150272335 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W2278703887 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W2390955350 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W2533756606 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W2616385997 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W2896278954 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W2912103424 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W2920071772 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W2980428655 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W3024080539 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W3031819633 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W3081663404 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W3092752819 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W3147581570 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W3196061239 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W3200413755 @default.
• W2620061279 hasRelatedWork W3206742698 @default.
• W2620061279 hasVolume "4" @default.
• W2620061279 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2620061279 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2620061279 magId "2620061279" @default.
• W2620061279 workType "article" @default.