FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2620121221> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2620121221 endingPage "77" @default.
• W2620121221 startingPage "68" @default.
• W2620121221 abstract "Abstract Objectives To review the evidence for the efficacy of periodontal maintenance ( PM ) carried out in primary dental care ( PDC ) compared to the specialist setting for patients previously treated in a specialist setting for chronic (ChP) or aggressive (AgP) periodontitis. Methods A focused PICO question and search protocol were developed. Online databases including MEDLINE , EMBASE , WEB OF SCIENCE ™ and COCHRANE LIBRARY were searched along with specialist journals in the subject area of periodontal research. Selection criteria included studies that investigated delivery of PM in both specialist and PDC settings for patients with ChP or AgP over a minimum 12 months. We looked for studies that reported changes in clinical attachment levels ( CAL ), tooth loss, pocket probing depths (PPDs) and bleeding on probing (BoP) as outcome measures. Results Eight cohort studies were chosen for inclusion. There was considerable heterogeneity found between the eight studies, which did not allow for quantitative (meta) analysis and statistical testing of differences between groups. Clinical attachment levels remained relatively stable in patients who received specialist PM with mean changes of −0.42 mm to +0.2 mm, while for those enrolled in PDC ‐based PM for periods >12 months, mean CAL losses were between −0.13 mm and −2.80 mm. PPD reduction for those subjects receiving specialist PM was between 0.05 and 1.8 mm for five studies but two cohorts experienced increases of 0.32 and 0.80 mm, respectively. Increases of up to 2.90 mm (range: −0.1 to +2.90) and a higher proportion of deeper pockets were noted among PDC PM cohorts. Higher rates of BoP among those in receipt of PDC PM were reported in half of all studies. There were insufficient long‐term data to make any firm conclusions about the effect of the delivery of PM on tooth loss. Conclusion Within the limitations of the data available, it appears that specialist PM is effective in sustaining periodontal stability following active specialist intervention. There is limited evidence that PDC provides the same level of care; however, the limited comparative data available suggest that outcomes could be slightly worse in PDC." @default.
• W2620121221 created "2017-06-05" @default.
• W2620121221 creator A5042092741 @default.
• W2620121221 creator A5056052011 @default.
• W2620121221 date "2017-05-22" @default.
• W2620121221 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2620121221 title "Periodontal maintenance following active specialist treatment: Should patients stay put or return to primary dental care for continuing care? A comparison of outcomes based on the literature" @default.
• W2620121221 cites W1666243354 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W1966695362 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W1984668523 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W1986914957 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W1987672612 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2002624702 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2014166203 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2030670981 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2030997815 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2042346545 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2049799103 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2050035976 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2057621064 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2057946848 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2064700184 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2072469437 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2098885938 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2098923148 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2102259996 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2109826700 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2114257962 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2133544279 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2138550019 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2141275153 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2141794549 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2143578412 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2148691285 @default.
• W2620121221 cites W2155827093 @default.
• W2620121221 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12288" @default.
• W2620121221 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28544259" @default.
• W2620121221 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2620121221 type Work @default.
• W2620121221 sameAs 2620121221 @default.
• W2620121221 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2620121221 countsByYear W26201212212018 @default.
• W2620121221 countsByYear W26201212212019 @default.
• W2620121221 countsByYear W26201212212021 @default.
• W2620121221 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2620121221 hasAuthorship W2620121221A5042092741 @default.
• W2620121221 hasAuthorship W2620121221A5056052011 @default.
• W2620121221 hasBestOaLocation W26201212212 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C119423318 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C201903717 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C2777968807 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C2779337755 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C2780385504 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C2984752397 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C3020774429 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C119423318 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C126322002 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C17744445 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C194828623 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C199343813 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C199539241 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C201903717 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C2776478404 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C2777968807 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C2779337755 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C2779473830 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C2780385504 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C2984752397 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C3020774429 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C512399662 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C71924100 @default.
• W2620121221 hasConceptScore W2620121221C95190672 @default.
• W2620121221 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2620121221 hasLocation W26201212211 @default.
• W2620121221 hasLocation W26201212212 @default.
• W2620121221 hasLocation W26201212213 @default.
• W2620121221 hasOpenAccess W2620121221 @default.
• W2620121221 hasPrimaryLocation W26201212211 @default.
• W2620121221 hasRelatedWork W2415284151 @default.
• W2620121221 hasRelatedWork W2606948157 @default.
• W2620121221 hasRelatedWork W2739409155 @default.
• W2620121221 hasRelatedWork W2990575572 @default.
• W2620121221 hasRelatedWork W2994923874 @default.
• W2620121221 hasRelatedWork W3027459656 @default.
• W2620121221 hasRelatedWork W3081220345 @default.
• W2620121221 hasRelatedWork W3118775732 @default.
• W2620121221 hasRelatedWork W3134414398 @default.
• W2620121221 hasRelatedWork W4294018962 @default.

• next