FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2625910192> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2625910192 endingPage "23" @default.
• W2625910192 startingPage "15" @default.
• W2625910192 abstract "There are a number of clinical scores for bronchiolitis but none of them are firmly recommended in the guidelines. We designed a study to compare two scales of bronchiolitis (ESBA and Wood Downes Ferres) and determine which of them better predicts the severity. A multicentre prospective study with patients <12 months with acute bronchiolitis was conducted. Each patient was assessed with the two scales when admission was decided. We created a new variable “severe condition” to determine whether one scale afforded better discrimination of severity. A diagnostic test analysis of sensitivity and specificity was made, with a comparison of the AUC. Based on the optimum cut-off points of the ROC curves for classifying bronchiolitis as severe we calculated new Se, Sp, LR+ and LR− for each scale in our sample. 201 patients were included, 66.7% males and median age 2.3 months (IQR = 1.3–4.4). Thirteen patients suffered bronchiolitis considered to be severe, according to the variable severe condition. ESBA showed a Se = 3.6%, Sp = 98.1%, and WDF showed Se = 46.2% and Sp = 91.5%. The difference between the two AUC for each scale was 0.02 (95%CI: 0.01–0.15), p = 0.72. With new cut-off points we could increase Se and Sp for ESBA: Se = 84.6%, Sp = 78.7%, and WDF showed Se = 92.3% and Sp = 54.8%; with higher LR. None of the scales studied was considered optimum for assessing our patients. With new cut-off points, the scales increased the ability to classify severe infants. New validation studies are needed to prove these new cut-off points." @default.
• W2625910192 created "2017-06-23" @default.
• W2625910192 creator A5020444395 @default.
• W2625910192 creator A5025019704 @default.
• W2625910192 creator A5037025799 @default.
• W2625910192 creator A5045995235 @default.
• W2625910192 creator A5066225525 @default.
• W2625910192 creator A5067836430 @default.
• W2625910192 creator A5076218162 @default.
• W2625910192 date "2018-01-01" @default.
• W2625910192 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2625910192 title "A comparison of two clinical scores for bronchiolitis. A multicentre and prospective study conducted in hospitalised infants" @default.
• W2625910192 cites W1877919713 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W1995268356 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W1997179053 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W2014710560 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W2024832448 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W2028343272 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W2063709637 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W2077290707 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W2114334123 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W2116702696 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W2127825607 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W2156304672 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W2158477291 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W2159826008 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W2159938925 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W2163349465 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W2170089187 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W2409042906 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W31078488 @default.
• W2625910192 cites W424468185 @default.
• W2625910192 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aller.2017.01.012" @default.
• W2625910192 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28629673" @default.
• W2625910192 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2625910192 type Work @default.
• W2625910192 sameAs 2625910192 @default.
• W2625910192 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2625910192 countsByYear W26259101922019 @default.
• W2625910192 countsByYear W26259101922020 @default.
• W2625910192 countsByYear W26259101922022 @default.
• W2625910192 countsByYear W26259101922023 @default.
• W2625910192 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2625910192 hasAuthorship W2625910192A5020444395 @default.
• W2625910192 hasAuthorship W2625910192A5025019704 @default.
• W2625910192 hasAuthorship W2625910192A5037025799 @default.
• W2625910192 hasAuthorship W2625910192A5045995235 @default.
• W2625910192 hasAuthorship W2625910192A5066225525 @default.
• W2625910192 hasAuthorship W2625910192A5067836430 @default.
• W2625910192 hasAuthorship W2625910192A5076218162 @default.
• W2625910192 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2625910192 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2625910192 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2625910192 hasConcept C2778821649 @default.
• W2625910192 hasConcept C30036603 @default.
• W2625910192 hasConcept C534529494 @default.
• W2625910192 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2625910192 hasConceptScore W2625910192C126322002 @default.
• W2625910192 hasConceptScore W2625910192C187212893 @default.
• W2625910192 hasConceptScore W2625910192C188816634 @default.
• W2625910192 hasConceptScore W2625910192C2778821649 @default.
• W2625910192 hasConceptScore W2625910192C30036603 @default.
• W2625910192 hasConceptScore W2625910192C534529494 @default.
• W2625910192 hasConceptScore W2625910192C71924100 @default.
• W2625910192 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2625910192 hasLocation W26259101921 @default.
• W2625910192 hasLocation W26259101922 @default.
• W2625910192 hasOpenAccess W2625910192 @default.
• W2625910192 hasPrimaryLocation W26259101921 @default.
• W2625910192 hasRelatedWork W1496869213 @default.
• W2625910192 hasRelatedWork W2038968096 @default.
• W2625910192 hasRelatedWork W2042952314 @default.
• W2625910192 hasRelatedWork W2100092531 @default.
• W2625910192 hasRelatedWork W2783036748 @default.
• W2625910192 hasRelatedWork W2979068073 @default.
• W2625910192 hasRelatedWork W3133260848 @default.
• W2625910192 hasRelatedWork W3203376441 @default.
• W2625910192 hasRelatedWork W4220921401 @default.
• W2625910192 hasRelatedWork W4298630167 @default.
• W2625910192 hasVolume "46" @default.
• W2625910192 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2625910192 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2625910192 magId "2625910192" @default.
• W2625910192 workType "article" @default.