FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2626566237> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2626566237 abstract "Memory in Language: Language in Memory Peter Culicover (culicove@ling.ohio-state.edu) Department of Linguistics, The Ohio State University, 1712 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA Simon Dennis (simon.dennis@gmail.com) Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA Marc Howard (marc@chb.syr.edu) Department of Psychology, Syracuse University Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA Richard Lewis (rickl@umich.edu) Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 525 East University, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1109, USA Brian McElree (brian.mcelree@nyu.edu) Department of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA Keywords: memory, language, sentence processing, depen- dency, memory load, Although constraints of memory have long been assumed to affect sentence processing (Miller & Chomsky, 1963) and contingencies in language have long been known to affect human memory (Miller & Selfridge, 1950), the connection between models of sentence comprehension and memory re- mains less than clear and there is often too little dialogue between memory and language researchers. In this sympo- sium, we aim to bring together researchers studying sentence processing that are interested in the constraints imposed by memory (Culicover, Lewis, McElree) and researchers study- ing memory that work on incorporating language sensitive representations into their models (Dennis, Howard). The prima facie evidence for the potential value of a closer relationship is substantial. For instance, Fedorenko, Gibson, and Rohde (2006) found that when a working memory load is imposed during sentence comprehension, object extracted relative clauses, which are typically more difficult to process, are affected more than subject extracted relative clauses. This effect is magnified if the nouns present in the working mem- ory set are similar to those in the sentence. In addition, when a licensor for a negative polarity item appears in an inacces- sible position (such as ”no” in ”A man who had no beard was ever thrifty”) it nonetheless impacts both the reading time and the probability of judging the string grammatical (Vasishth, Brussow, Lewis, & Drenhaus, 2008) suggesting that sentence processing is subject to the kinds of similarity phenomena that are observed ubiquitously in working memory studies. Models of short term memory have progressed substan- tially since the observations of Miller and Chomsky (1963) observations. Buffer models have been replaced by direct ac- cess models and the cue dependent nature of memory is now more broadly appreciated. The importance of this change in perspective was underlined by McElree, Foraker, and Dyer (2003). Using a response signal procedure, they found that while increasing the length of a dependency impacts accuracy it does not affect the rate of formation accrual the signature pattern of a direct access memory process. The broad implication is that the detailed nature of sen- tence processing emerges from the interaction of general prin- ciples of human memory with the specialized task of lan- guage comprehension. Conversely, many memory experi- ments involve sequences of word stimuli and the role of lan- guage is well known. For instance, Howard, Addis, Jing, and Kahana (2007) showed that semantic relatedness affects the conditional response probability of producing items in free recall. Furthermore, models of free recall performance such as the temporal context model (Howard & Kahana, 2002) can be used to construct lexical representations directly from lan- guage corpora. The purpose of the symposium is to bring together leading researchers from both domains to discuss how memory and language models can be brought into closer alignment. Peter Culicover: Linguists working on the syntax of nat- ural languages conventionally categorize instances of unac- ceptability as ’ungrammaticality’ (except for clear cases of semantic anomaly). However, there has been a recent trend (even among some linguists, e.g. Kluender, Sag, myself) in favor of taking a somewhat narrower view of what constitutes ’ungrammaticality’, and to attribute some types of unaccept- abilty to the processing complexity associated with particular syntactic constructions. Typically, such complexity is char- acterized in terms of ’memory limitations’ (as in the work of scholars such as Gibson and Lewis), the most familiar cases involving nested dependency in relative clauses. I consider a" @default.
• W2626566237 created "2017-06-23" @default.
• W2626566237 creator A5056921189 @default.
• W2626566237 creator A5077109450 @default.
• W2626566237 creator A5080394708 @default.
• W2626566237 creator A5085169868 @default.
• W2626566237 creator A5090859840 @default.
• W2626566237 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W2626566237 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2626566237 title "Memory in Language: Language in Memory" @default.
• W2626566237 cites W1585040575 @default.
• W2626566237 cites W1605773274 @default.
• W2626566237 cites W184546096 @default.
• W2626566237 cites W2001788447 @default.
• W2626566237 cites W2008638244 @default.
• W2626566237 cites W2032776989 @default.
• W2626566237 cites W2053497443 @default.
• W2626566237 cites W2130924704 @default.
• W2626566237 cites W2171766645 @default.
• W2626566237 cites W2313891975 @default.
• W2626566237 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2626566237 type Work @default.
• W2626566237 sameAs 2626566237 @default.
• W2626566237 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2626566237 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2626566237 hasAuthorship W2626566237A5056921189 @default.
• W2626566237 hasAuthorship W2626566237A5077109450 @default.
• W2626566237 hasAuthorship W2626566237A5080394708 @default.
• W2626566237 hasAuthorship W2626566237A5085169868 @default.
• W2626566237 hasAuthorship W2626566237A5090859840 @default.
• W2626566237 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2626566237 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2626566237 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2626566237 hasConcept C188147891 @default.
• W2626566237 hasConcept C2777530160 @default.
• W2626566237 hasConcept C2780378701 @default.
• W2626566237 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2626566237 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2626566237 hasConceptScore W2626566237C138885662 @default.
• W2626566237 hasConceptScore W2626566237C154945302 @default.
• W2626566237 hasConceptScore W2626566237C15744967 @default.
• W2626566237 hasConceptScore W2626566237C188147891 @default.
• W2626566237 hasConceptScore W2626566237C2777530160 @default.
• W2626566237 hasConceptScore W2626566237C2780378701 @default.
• W2626566237 hasConceptScore W2626566237C41008148 @default.
• W2626566237 hasConceptScore W2626566237C41895202 @default.
• W2626566237 hasIssue "31" @default.
• W2626566237 hasLocation W26265662371 @default.
• W2626566237 hasOpenAccess W2626566237 @default.
• W2626566237 hasPrimaryLocation W26265662371 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W130939806 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W1520838780 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W1565061821 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W2062303642 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W2067786565 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W207053376 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W2284697964 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W2380942462 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W2400699013 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W2401039790 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W2479388725 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W2578146533 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W2792666926 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W2949293954 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W2995015294 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W3083398598 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W413358589 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W632294606 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W188028912 @default.
• W2626566237 hasRelatedWork W2398095303 @default.
• W2626566237 hasVolume "31" @default.
• W2626566237 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2626566237 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2626566237 magId "2626566237" @default.
• W2626566237 workType "article" @default.